梯形切除联合改良嵌入式垂直褥式缝合技术对剖腹产术后瘢痕形成的影响。

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL American journal of translational research Pub Date : 2024-08-15 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.62347/MGKQ5295
Yudi Xie, Yiling Chen, Yihuang Hong, Qionghua Chen
{"title":"梯形切除联合改良嵌入式垂直褥式缝合技术对剖腹产术后瘢痕形成的影响。","authors":"Yudi Xie, Yiling Chen, Yihuang Hong, Qionghua Chen","doi":"10.62347/MGKQ5295","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To study the impact of modified embedded vertical mattress suture technique in conjunction with trapezoidal resection on the formation of scars after cesarean section. This retrospective study involved 339 pregnant women who had cesarean sections at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University from September 2020 to August 2023. Among them, 150 patients who received traditional subcutaneous fat layer discontinuous suture during September 2020 and June 2022 were assigned to the control group, and 152 patients who received improved buried vertical mattress suture technique and trapezoidal resection between July 2022 and August 2023 were assigned to the observation group. The therapeutic effect, surgical parameters and cosmetic effects in the two groups were compared. The suture time of the observation group was longer than that of the control group (t=27.858, P<0.001). The grade A healing rate (96.05%) and cosmetic satisfaction rate (94.08%) in the observation group were significantly higher than those (76.00% and 74.00%) in the control group (all P<0.001); while the incidences of suture reaction (12.05%), complication (1.96%), and hypertrophic scar (5.26%) were significantly lower than those in the control group (38.00%, 22.00%, and 27.33%, respectively) (all P<0.001). The visual analogue scale (VAS) score in the observation group was lower than that of the control group (intergroup effect: F=1434.000, P<0.001; time effect: F=91.091, P<0.001; interaction effect: F=2.409, P=0.091). The postoperative VSS score and scar width in the observation group were lower than those in the control group (all P<0.001). Multivariate analysis showed that complications (P=0.006) and suture method (P=0.016) were independent influencing factors for the occurrence of hypertrophic scars in pregnant women. Trapezoidal resection combined with improved buried vertical mattress suture technique can promote incision healing, reduce suture reaction, incision pain, adverse complications and the incidence of hyperplastic scar, and improve the cosmetic effect of surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":7731,"journal":{"name":"American journal of translational research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11384344/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of trapezoidal excision combined with modified embedded vertical mattress suture technique on postoperative scar formation after cesarean section.\",\"authors\":\"Yudi Xie, Yiling Chen, Yihuang Hong, Qionghua Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.62347/MGKQ5295\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>To study the impact of modified embedded vertical mattress suture technique in conjunction with trapezoidal resection on the formation of scars after cesarean section. This retrospective study involved 339 pregnant women who had cesarean sections at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University from September 2020 to August 2023. Among them, 150 patients who received traditional subcutaneous fat layer discontinuous suture during September 2020 and June 2022 were assigned to the control group, and 152 patients who received improved buried vertical mattress suture technique and trapezoidal resection between July 2022 and August 2023 were assigned to the observation group. The therapeutic effect, surgical parameters and cosmetic effects in the two groups were compared. The suture time of the observation group was longer than that of the control group (t=27.858, P<0.001). The grade A healing rate (96.05%) and cosmetic satisfaction rate (94.08%) in the observation group were significantly higher than those (76.00% and 74.00%) in the control group (all P<0.001); while the incidences of suture reaction (12.05%), complication (1.96%), and hypertrophic scar (5.26%) were significantly lower than those in the control group (38.00%, 22.00%, and 27.33%, respectively) (all P<0.001). The visual analogue scale (VAS) score in the observation group was lower than that of the control group (intergroup effect: F=1434.000, P<0.001; time effect: F=91.091, P<0.001; interaction effect: F=2.409, P=0.091). The postoperative VSS score and scar width in the observation group were lower than those in the control group (all P<0.001). Multivariate analysis showed that complications (P=0.006) and suture method (P=0.016) were independent influencing factors for the occurrence of hypertrophic scars in pregnant women. Trapezoidal resection combined with improved buried vertical mattress suture technique can promote incision healing, reduce suture reaction, incision pain, adverse complications and the incidence of hyperplastic scar, and improve the cosmetic effect of surgery.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7731,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American journal of translational research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11384344/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American journal of translational research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.62347/MGKQ5295\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of translational research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.62347/MGKQ5295","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的 研究改良嵌入式垂直褥式缝合技术结合梯形切除术对剖宫产术后疤痕形成的影响。该回顾性研究涉及2020年9月至2023年8月在厦门大学附属第一医院妇产科进行剖宫产手术的339名孕妇。其中,将2020年9月至2022年6月期间接受传统皮下脂肪层间断缝合术的150例患者分为对照组,将2022年7月至2023年8月期间接受改良埋线垂直褥式缝合技术及梯形切除术的152例患者分为观察组。比较两组的治疗效果、手术参数和美容效果。观察组的缝合时间长于对照组(t=27.858,P<0.05)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Effect of trapezoidal excision combined with modified embedded vertical mattress suture technique on postoperative scar formation after cesarean section.

To study the impact of modified embedded vertical mattress suture technique in conjunction with trapezoidal resection on the formation of scars after cesarean section. This retrospective study involved 339 pregnant women who had cesarean sections at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University from September 2020 to August 2023. Among them, 150 patients who received traditional subcutaneous fat layer discontinuous suture during September 2020 and June 2022 were assigned to the control group, and 152 patients who received improved buried vertical mattress suture technique and trapezoidal resection between July 2022 and August 2023 were assigned to the observation group. The therapeutic effect, surgical parameters and cosmetic effects in the two groups were compared. The suture time of the observation group was longer than that of the control group (t=27.858, P<0.001). The grade A healing rate (96.05%) and cosmetic satisfaction rate (94.08%) in the observation group were significantly higher than those (76.00% and 74.00%) in the control group (all P<0.001); while the incidences of suture reaction (12.05%), complication (1.96%), and hypertrophic scar (5.26%) were significantly lower than those in the control group (38.00%, 22.00%, and 27.33%, respectively) (all P<0.001). The visual analogue scale (VAS) score in the observation group was lower than that of the control group (intergroup effect: F=1434.000, P<0.001; time effect: F=91.091, P<0.001; interaction effect: F=2.409, P=0.091). The postoperative VSS score and scar width in the observation group were lower than those in the control group (all P<0.001). Multivariate analysis showed that complications (P=0.006) and suture method (P=0.016) were independent influencing factors for the occurrence of hypertrophic scars in pregnant women. Trapezoidal resection combined with improved buried vertical mattress suture technique can promote incision healing, reduce suture reaction, incision pain, adverse complications and the incidence of hyperplastic scar, and improve the cosmetic effect of surgery.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
American journal of translational research
American journal of translational research ONCOLOGY-MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
自引率
0.00%
发文量
552
期刊介绍: Information not localized
期刊最新文献
Comparison of the effectiveness of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and adjuvant chemotherapy for improving prognosis in triple-negative breast cancer patients. Comparison of the efficacy of phloroglucinol versus ritodrine hydrochloride in preventing miscarriage and adverse reactions. Comparison of the therapeutic efficacy of hip arthroplasty and proximal femoral nail antirotation internal fixation for unstable intertrochanteric femur fractures. A comparative study of the efficacy and safety of PD-1/L1 inhibitor and platinum-containing dual-agent chemotherapy in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer resistant to EGFR-TKIs. A dual analysis of bougie and stylet development trend and impact of Chinese regulations on medical devices innovation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1