评估确定心房颤动患者口服抗凝药持续性和依从性的方法。

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS American heart journal Pub Date : 2024-09-18 DOI:10.1016/j.ahj.2024.09.004
Anran Tan MS , Sushama Kattinakere Sreedhara MBBS, MSPH , Massimiliano Russo PhD , Daniel E Singer MD , Julie C. Lauffenburger PharmD, PhD , Elyse DiCesare BA , Kueiyu Joshua Lin MD, ScD
{"title":"评估确定心房颤动患者口服抗凝药持续性和依从性的方法。","authors":"Anran Tan MS ,&nbsp;Sushama Kattinakere Sreedhara MBBS, MSPH ,&nbsp;Massimiliano Russo PhD ,&nbsp;Daniel E Singer MD ,&nbsp;Julie C. Lauffenburger PharmD, PhD ,&nbsp;Elyse DiCesare BA ,&nbsp;Kueiyu Joshua Lin MD, ScD","doi":"10.1016/j.ahj.2024.09.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Persistence and adherence to oral anticoagulants (OACs) is crucial for its effectiveness in stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation (AF). We aimed to assess the impact of different ascertainment methods on estimated persistence rates.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We conducted a retrospective cohort study based on the Medicare claims data (01/01/2013-12/31/2019). We built an incident user cohort of OAC (apixaban, dabigatran, edoxaban, rivaroxaban, and warfarin) prescription filling. We measured OAC medication persistence and adherence using the following approaches: (1) treatment-anniversary based persistence: if there is an active prescription overlapping the 180th and 365th day with vs. without a 15-day buffer period (i.e., overlapping with 165th-195th and 350th-380th day); (2) dispensing-gap-based persistence: if there is OAC discontinuation defined as having gap between prescriptions more than a threshold (e.g., 5-60 days) and secondarily, (3) proportion of days covered (PDC) adherence: proportion of days in which patient had filled medication available over the 365-day interval.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>We identified 1,398,692 patients who initiated OACs during the study interval. With the treatment-anniversary based approach, only 51.2% to 65.4% of the patients persisted with the medication for either warfarin or DOACs at 180 days, and the number dropped to 43.4% to 60.7% at 1 year. Adding a 15-day buffer period increased the treatment-anniversary based persistence rates by 6.5% to 10.5%. When the allowable gap increased from 5 to 60 days, the persistence rates increased by 36.3% to 42.4% for all OACs. Apixaban users had the highest PDC (74%-75%) over the 365 days, compared to other OACs (60%-69%).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>We found that the estimated persistence rates are sensitive to the choice of ascertainment methods. When reporting and comparing persistence findings using the claims database, definitions of OAC discontinuation must be clearly delineated.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7868,"journal":{"name":"American heart journal","volume":"278 ","pages":"Pages 161-169"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing methods to ascertain persistence and adherence of oral anticoagulants in patients with atrial fibrillation\",\"authors\":\"Anran Tan MS ,&nbsp;Sushama Kattinakere Sreedhara MBBS, MSPH ,&nbsp;Massimiliano Russo PhD ,&nbsp;Daniel E Singer MD ,&nbsp;Julie C. Lauffenburger PharmD, PhD ,&nbsp;Elyse DiCesare BA ,&nbsp;Kueiyu Joshua Lin MD, ScD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ahj.2024.09.004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Persistence and adherence to oral anticoagulants (OACs) is crucial for its effectiveness in stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation (AF). We aimed to assess the impact of different ascertainment methods on estimated persistence rates.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We conducted a retrospective cohort study based on the Medicare claims data (01/01/2013-12/31/2019). We built an incident user cohort of OAC (apixaban, dabigatran, edoxaban, rivaroxaban, and warfarin) prescription filling. We measured OAC medication persistence and adherence using the following approaches: (1) treatment-anniversary based persistence: if there is an active prescription overlapping the 180th and 365th day with vs. without a 15-day buffer period (i.e., overlapping with 165th-195th and 350th-380th day); (2) dispensing-gap-based persistence: if there is OAC discontinuation defined as having gap between prescriptions more than a threshold (e.g., 5-60 days) and secondarily, (3) proportion of days covered (PDC) adherence: proportion of days in which patient had filled medication available over the 365-day interval.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>We identified 1,398,692 patients who initiated OACs during the study interval. With the treatment-anniversary based approach, only 51.2% to 65.4% of the patients persisted with the medication for either warfarin or DOACs at 180 days, and the number dropped to 43.4% to 60.7% at 1 year. Adding a 15-day buffer period increased the treatment-anniversary based persistence rates by 6.5% to 10.5%. When the allowable gap increased from 5 to 60 days, the persistence rates increased by 36.3% to 42.4% for all OACs. Apixaban users had the highest PDC (74%-75%) over the 365 days, compared to other OACs (60%-69%).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>We found that the estimated persistence rates are sensitive to the choice of ascertainment methods. When reporting and comparing persistence findings using the claims database, definitions of OAC discontinuation must be clearly delineated.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7868,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American heart journal\",\"volume\":\"278 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 161-169\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American heart journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002870324002370\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American heart journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002870324002370","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:口服抗凝药(OACs)的持续性和依从性是其有效预防心房颤动(AF)患者中风的关键。我们旨在评估不同确认方法对估计持续率的影响:我们基于医疗保险理赔数据(01/01/2013-12/31/2019)开展了一项回顾性队列研究。我们建立了一个 OAC(阿哌沙班、达比加群、依度沙班、利伐沙班和华法林)处方填充的事件用户队列。我们采用以下方法测量 OAC 的用药持续性和依从性:1) 基于治疗周年纪念日的持续性:如果有效处方与第 180 天和第 365 天重叠,且有 15 天缓冲期(即与第 165-195 天和第 350-380 天重叠);2) 基于配药间隙的持续性:如果有 OAC 停药,即处方间隙超过阈值(如 5 至 60 天),其次是有 OAC 停药、5至60天),其次是3)覆盖天数比例(PDC)的依从性:在365天的间隔期内,患者已服药的天数比例:结果:我们发现有 1,398,692 名患者在研究期间开始使用 OAC。采用基于治疗纪念日的方法后,只有 51.2% 至 65.4% 的患者在 180 天内坚持服用华法林或 DOACs,一年后这一比例降至 43.4% 至 60.7%。增加 15 天缓冲期后,基于治疗周年的坚持率增加了 6.5% 至 10.5%。当允许的间隙从 5 天增加到 60 天时,所有 OAC 的持续率都增加了 36.3% 到 42.4%。与其他 OACs(60% 至 69%)相比,阿哌沙班使用者在 365 天内的 PDC(74% 至 75%)最高:我们发现,估计的持续率对确定方法的选择很敏感。在使用索赔数据库报告和比较持续率结果时,必须明确界定停用 OAC 的定义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Assessing methods to ascertain persistence and adherence of oral anticoagulants in patients with atrial fibrillation

Background

Persistence and adherence to oral anticoagulants (OACs) is crucial for its effectiveness in stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation (AF). We aimed to assess the impact of different ascertainment methods on estimated persistence rates.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective cohort study based on the Medicare claims data (01/01/2013-12/31/2019). We built an incident user cohort of OAC (apixaban, dabigatran, edoxaban, rivaroxaban, and warfarin) prescription filling. We measured OAC medication persistence and adherence using the following approaches: (1) treatment-anniversary based persistence: if there is an active prescription overlapping the 180th and 365th day with vs. without a 15-day buffer period (i.e., overlapping with 165th-195th and 350th-380th day); (2) dispensing-gap-based persistence: if there is OAC discontinuation defined as having gap between prescriptions more than a threshold (e.g., 5-60 days) and secondarily, (3) proportion of days covered (PDC) adherence: proportion of days in which patient had filled medication available over the 365-day interval.

Results

We identified 1,398,692 patients who initiated OACs during the study interval. With the treatment-anniversary based approach, only 51.2% to 65.4% of the patients persisted with the medication for either warfarin or DOACs at 180 days, and the number dropped to 43.4% to 60.7% at 1 year. Adding a 15-day buffer period increased the treatment-anniversary based persistence rates by 6.5% to 10.5%. When the allowable gap increased from 5 to 60 days, the persistence rates increased by 36.3% to 42.4% for all OACs. Apixaban users had the highest PDC (74%-75%) over the 365 days, compared to other OACs (60%-69%).

Conclusions

We found that the estimated persistence rates are sensitive to the choice of ascertainment methods. When reporting and comparing persistence findings using the claims database, definitions of OAC discontinuation must be clearly delineated.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
American heart journal
American heart journal 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
2.10%
发文量
214
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: The American Heart Journal will consider for publication suitable articles on topics pertaining to the broad discipline of cardiovascular disease. Our goal is to provide the reader primary investigation, scholarly review, and opinion concerning the practice of cardiovascular medicine. We especially encourage submission of 3 types of reports that are not frequently seen in cardiovascular journals: negative clinical studies, reports on study designs, and studies involving the organization of medical care. The Journal does not accept individual case reports or original articles involving bench laboratory or animal research.
期刊最新文献
Effect of apixaban versus vitamin K antagonist and aspirin versus placebo on days alive and out of hospital: An analysis from AUGUSTUS. Chest pain and coronary artery disease in cardiac amyloidosis: Prevalence, mechanisms, and clinical implications. Changes in coverage, access, and health status among adults with cardiovascular disease after medicaid work requirements. Impact of Moderate or Severe Mitral and Tricuspid Valves Regurgitation after Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement. Efficacy of Dual Antiplatelet therapy after Ischemic Stroke According to hsCRP Levels and CYP2C19 Genotype.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1