类风湿性关节炎相关间质性肺病中的 Janus 激酶抑制剂:系统回顾和荟萃分析。

IF 9.2 1区 医学 Q1 IMMUNOLOGY Autoimmunity reviews Pub Date : 2024-09-11 DOI:10.1016/j.autrev.2024.103636
Javier Narváez , Martí Aguilar-Coll , Montserrat Roig-Kim , Pol Maymó-Paituvi , Judith Palacios-Olid , Joan Miquel Nolla , Dídac LLop
{"title":"类风湿性关节炎相关间质性肺病中的 Janus 激酶抑制剂:系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Javier Narváez ,&nbsp;Martí Aguilar-Coll ,&nbsp;Montserrat Roig-Kim ,&nbsp;Pol Maymó-Paituvi ,&nbsp;Judith Palacios-Olid ,&nbsp;Joan Miquel Nolla ,&nbsp;Dídac LLop","doi":"10.1016/j.autrev.2024.103636","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>The treatment of rheumatoid arthritis-associated interstitial lung disease (RA-ILD) remains challenging due to the scarcity of proven effective therapeutic options. This study aimed to investigate the effectiveness and safety of Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKi) in RA-ILD.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We systematically reviewed the literature to identify studies evaluating the efficacy and safety of JAK inhibitors in RA-ILD. A meta-analysis was performed using the random-effects model.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The literature search identified seven observational studies assessing the safety and efficacy of JAKi in RA-ILD and three studies analyzing the risk of developing de novo ILD in RA patients treated with JAKi.</div><div>Among 183 patients with RA-ILD, the pooled analysis demonstrated an increase of 2.07 % in %pFVC (95 % CI: 0.57–3.58; <em>p</em> = 0.007) and 3.12 % in %pDLCO (95 % CI: 2.11–4.12; <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001). Thoracic HRCT scans showed improvement in 11 % of patients (95 % CI: 0.01–0.29). The pooled proportion of patients experiencing worsening of pre-existing ILD was 5 % (95 % CI: 0.01–0.11).</div><div>Adverse events were reported in 14 % of cases (95 % CI: 0.08–0.21), with the frequency of clinically significant infections ranging from 4.5 % to 25 %.</div><div>The risk of developing de novo ILD in patients receiving JAKi was low, with an incidence rate of 0.20 per 1000 person-years (95 % CI: 0.14–0.25). Comparisons with abatacept and rituximab suggested similar efficacy and safety profiles.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>JAKi are well tolerated and might be a viable treatment option for RA-ILD, offering comparable safety and efficacy to abatacept and rituximab.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8664,"journal":{"name":"Autoimmunity reviews","volume":"23 10","pages":"Article 103636"},"PeriodicalIF":9.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Janus kinase inhibitors in rheumatoid arthritis-associated interstitial lung disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis\",\"authors\":\"Javier Narváez ,&nbsp;Martí Aguilar-Coll ,&nbsp;Montserrat Roig-Kim ,&nbsp;Pol Maymó-Paituvi ,&nbsp;Judith Palacios-Olid ,&nbsp;Joan Miquel Nolla ,&nbsp;Dídac LLop\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.autrev.2024.103636\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>The treatment of rheumatoid arthritis-associated interstitial lung disease (RA-ILD) remains challenging due to the scarcity of proven effective therapeutic options. This study aimed to investigate the effectiveness and safety of Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKi) in RA-ILD.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We systematically reviewed the literature to identify studies evaluating the efficacy and safety of JAK inhibitors in RA-ILD. A meta-analysis was performed using the random-effects model.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The literature search identified seven observational studies assessing the safety and efficacy of JAKi in RA-ILD and three studies analyzing the risk of developing de novo ILD in RA patients treated with JAKi.</div><div>Among 183 patients with RA-ILD, the pooled analysis demonstrated an increase of 2.07 % in %pFVC (95 % CI: 0.57–3.58; <em>p</em> = 0.007) and 3.12 % in %pDLCO (95 % CI: 2.11–4.12; <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001). Thoracic HRCT scans showed improvement in 11 % of patients (95 % CI: 0.01–0.29). The pooled proportion of patients experiencing worsening of pre-existing ILD was 5 % (95 % CI: 0.01–0.11).</div><div>Adverse events were reported in 14 % of cases (95 % CI: 0.08–0.21), with the frequency of clinically significant infections ranging from 4.5 % to 25 %.</div><div>The risk of developing de novo ILD in patients receiving JAKi was low, with an incidence rate of 0.20 per 1000 person-years (95 % CI: 0.14–0.25). Comparisons with abatacept and rituximab suggested similar efficacy and safety profiles.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>JAKi are well tolerated and might be a viable treatment option for RA-ILD, offering comparable safety and efficacy to abatacept and rituximab.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8664,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Autoimmunity reviews\",\"volume\":\"23 10\",\"pages\":\"Article 103636\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Autoimmunity reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1568997224001277\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"IMMUNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Autoimmunity reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1568997224001277","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:由于缺乏行之有效的治疗方案,类风湿性关节炎相关性间质性肺病(RA-ILD)的治疗仍面临挑战。本研究旨在探讨Janus激酶抑制剂(JAKi)在RA-ILD中的有效性和安全性:我们系统地查阅了相关文献,以确定评估JAK抑制剂在RA-ILD中疗效和安全性的研究。采用随机效应模型进行了荟萃分析:文献检索发现了七项评估JAKi在RA-ILD中安全性和有效性的观察性研究,以及三项分析接受JAKi治疗的RA患者发生新生ILD风险的研究。在183例RA-ILD患者中,汇总分析结果显示,%pFVC增加了2.07%(95% CI:0.57-3.58;p = 0.007),%pDLCO增加了3.12%(95% CI:2.11-4.12;p 结论:JAKi对RA-ILD患者的耐受性和疗效良好:JAKi耐受性良好,可作为RA-ILD的可行治疗方案,其安全性和有效性与阿帕他赛和利妥昔单抗相当。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Janus kinase inhibitors in rheumatoid arthritis-associated interstitial lung disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Objective

The treatment of rheumatoid arthritis-associated interstitial lung disease (RA-ILD) remains challenging due to the scarcity of proven effective therapeutic options. This study aimed to investigate the effectiveness and safety of Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKi) in RA-ILD.

Methods

We systematically reviewed the literature to identify studies evaluating the efficacy and safety of JAK inhibitors in RA-ILD. A meta-analysis was performed using the random-effects model.

Results

The literature search identified seven observational studies assessing the safety and efficacy of JAKi in RA-ILD and three studies analyzing the risk of developing de novo ILD in RA patients treated with JAKi.
Among 183 patients with RA-ILD, the pooled analysis demonstrated an increase of 2.07 % in %pFVC (95 % CI: 0.57–3.58; p = 0.007) and 3.12 % in %pDLCO (95 % CI: 2.11–4.12; p < 0.001). Thoracic HRCT scans showed improvement in 11 % of patients (95 % CI: 0.01–0.29). The pooled proportion of patients experiencing worsening of pre-existing ILD was 5 % (95 % CI: 0.01–0.11).
Adverse events were reported in 14 % of cases (95 % CI: 0.08–0.21), with the frequency of clinically significant infections ranging from 4.5 % to 25 %.
The risk of developing de novo ILD in patients receiving JAKi was low, with an incidence rate of 0.20 per 1000 person-years (95 % CI: 0.14–0.25). Comparisons with abatacept and rituximab suggested similar efficacy and safety profiles.

Conclusion

JAKi are well tolerated and might be a viable treatment option for RA-ILD, offering comparable safety and efficacy to abatacept and rituximab.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Autoimmunity reviews
Autoimmunity reviews 医学-免疫学
CiteScore
24.70
自引率
4.40%
发文量
164
审稿时长
21 days
期刊介绍: Autoimmunity Reviews is a publication that features up-to-date, structured reviews on various topics in the field of autoimmunity. These reviews are written by renowned experts and include demonstrative illustrations and tables. Each article will have a clear "take-home" message for readers. The selection of articles is primarily done by the Editors-in-Chief, based on recommendations from the international Editorial Board. The topics covered in the articles span all areas of autoimmunology, aiming to bridge the gap between basic and clinical sciences. In terms of content, the contributions in basic sciences delve into the pathophysiology and mechanisms of autoimmune disorders, as well as genomics and proteomics. On the other hand, clinical contributions focus on diseases related to autoimmunity, novel therapies, and clinical associations. Autoimmunity Reviews is internationally recognized, and its articles are indexed and abstracted in prestigious databases such as PubMed/Medline, Science Citation Index Expanded, Biosciences Information Services, and Chemical Abstracts.
期刊最新文献
Anti-lipoprotein lipase antibodies: A review. MOGAD: A comprehensive review of clinicoradiological features, therapy and outcomes in 4699 patients globally. Advancing understanding of autoimmune disease-related interstitial lung disease (AD-ILD): A global perspective on research focus and future directions. Is it time for treat-to-target in antiphospholipid syndrome? Artificial intelligence meets the world experts; updates and novel therapies in autoimmunity - The 14th international congress on autoimmunity 2024 (AUTO14), Ljubljana.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1