Javier Narváez , Martí Aguilar-Coll , Montserrat Roig-Kim , Pol Maymó-Paituvi , Judith Palacios-Olid , Joan Miquel Nolla , Dídac LLop
{"title":"类风湿性关节炎相关间质性肺病中的 Janus 激酶抑制剂:系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Javier Narváez , Martí Aguilar-Coll , Montserrat Roig-Kim , Pol Maymó-Paituvi , Judith Palacios-Olid , Joan Miquel Nolla , Dídac LLop","doi":"10.1016/j.autrev.2024.103636","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>The treatment of rheumatoid arthritis-associated interstitial lung disease (RA-ILD) remains challenging due to the scarcity of proven effective therapeutic options. This study aimed to investigate the effectiveness and safety of Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKi) in RA-ILD.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We systematically reviewed the literature to identify studies evaluating the efficacy and safety of JAK inhibitors in RA-ILD. A meta-analysis was performed using the random-effects model.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The literature search identified seven observational studies assessing the safety and efficacy of JAKi in RA-ILD and three studies analyzing the risk of developing de novo ILD in RA patients treated with JAKi.</div><div>Among 183 patients with RA-ILD, the pooled analysis demonstrated an increase of 2.07 % in %pFVC (95 % CI: 0.57–3.58; <em>p</em> = 0.007) and 3.12 % in %pDLCO (95 % CI: 2.11–4.12; <em>p</em> < 0.001). Thoracic HRCT scans showed improvement in 11 % of patients (95 % CI: 0.01–0.29). The pooled proportion of patients experiencing worsening of pre-existing ILD was 5 % (95 % CI: 0.01–0.11).</div><div>Adverse events were reported in 14 % of cases (95 % CI: 0.08–0.21), with the frequency of clinically significant infections ranging from 4.5 % to 25 %.</div><div>The risk of developing de novo ILD in patients receiving JAKi was low, with an incidence rate of 0.20 per 1000 person-years (95 % CI: 0.14–0.25). Comparisons with abatacept and rituximab suggested similar efficacy and safety profiles.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>JAKi are well tolerated and might be a viable treatment option for RA-ILD, offering comparable safety and efficacy to abatacept and rituximab.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8664,"journal":{"name":"Autoimmunity reviews","volume":"23 10","pages":"Article 103636"},"PeriodicalIF":9.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Janus kinase inhibitors in rheumatoid arthritis-associated interstitial lung disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis\",\"authors\":\"Javier Narváez , Martí Aguilar-Coll , Montserrat Roig-Kim , Pol Maymó-Paituvi , Judith Palacios-Olid , Joan Miquel Nolla , Dídac LLop\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.autrev.2024.103636\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>The treatment of rheumatoid arthritis-associated interstitial lung disease (RA-ILD) remains challenging due to the scarcity of proven effective therapeutic options. This study aimed to investigate the effectiveness and safety of Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKi) in RA-ILD.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We systematically reviewed the literature to identify studies evaluating the efficacy and safety of JAK inhibitors in RA-ILD. A meta-analysis was performed using the random-effects model.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The literature search identified seven observational studies assessing the safety and efficacy of JAKi in RA-ILD and three studies analyzing the risk of developing de novo ILD in RA patients treated with JAKi.</div><div>Among 183 patients with RA-ILD, the pooled analysis demonstrated an increase of 2.07 % in %pFVC (95 % CI: 0.57–3.58; <em>p</em> = 0.007) and 3.12 % in %pDLCO (95 % CI: 2.11–4.12; <em>p</em> < 0.001). Thoracic HRCT scans showed improvement in 11 % of patients (95 % CI: 0.01–0.29). The pooled proportion of patients experiencing worsening of pre-existing ILD was 5 % (95 % CI: 0.01–0.11).</div><div>Adverse events were reported in 14 % of cases (95 % CI: 0.08–0.21), with the frequency of clinically significant infections ranging from 4.5 % to 25 %.</div><div>The risk of developing de novo ILD in patients receiving JAKi was low, with an incidence rate of 0.20 per 1000 person-years (95 % CI: 0.14–0.25). Comparisons with abatacept and rituximab suggested similar efficacy and safety profiles.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>JAKi are well tolerated and might be a viable treatment option for RA-ILD, offering comparable safety and efficacy to abatacept and rituximab.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8664,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Autoimmunity reviews\",\"volume\":\"23 10\",\"pages\":\"Article 103636\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Autoimmunity reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1568997224001277\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"IMMUNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Autoimmunity reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1568997224001277","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Janus kinase inhibitors in rheumatoid arthritis-associated interstitial lung disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Objective
The treatment of rheumatoid arthritis-associated interstitial lung disease (RA-ILD) remains challenging due to the scarcity of proven effective therapeutic options. This study aimed to investigate the effectiveness and safety of Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKi) in RA-ILD.
Methods
We systematically reviewed the literature to identify studies evaluating the efficacy and safety of JAK inhibitors in RA-ILD. A meta-analysis was performed using the random-effects model.
Results
The literature search identified seven observational studies assessing the safety and efficacy of JAKi in RA-ILD and three studies analyzing the risk of developing de novo ILD in RA patients treated with JAKi.
Among 183 patients with RA-ILD, the pooled analysis demonstrated an increase of 2.07 % in %pFVC (95 % CI: 0.57–3.58; p = 0.007) and 3.12 % in %pDLCO (95 % CI: 2.11–4.12; p < 0.001). Thoracic HRCT scans showed improvement in 11 % of patients (95 % CI: 0.01–0.29). The pooled proportion of patients experiencing worsening of pre-existing ILD was 5 % (95 % CI: 0.01–0.11).
Adverse events were reported in 14 % of cases (95 % CI: 0.08–0.21), with the frequency of clinically significant infections ranging from 4.5 % to 25 %.
The risk of developing de novo ILD in patients receiving JAKi was low, with an incidence rate of 0.20 per 1000 person-years (95 % CI: 0.14–0.25). Comparisons with abatacept and rituximab suggested similar efficacy and safety profiles.
Conclusion
JAKi are well tolerated and might be a viable treatment option for RA-ILD, offering comparable safety and efficacy to abatacept and rituximab.
期刊介绍:
Autoimmunity Reviews is a publication that features up-to-date, structured reviews on various topics in the field of autoimmunity. These reviews are written by renowned experts and include demonstrative illustrations and tables. Each article will have a clear "take-home" message for readers.
The selection of articles is primarily done by the Editors-in-Chief, based on recommendations from the international Editorial Board. The topics covered in the articles span all areas of autoimmunology, aiming to bridge the gap between basic and clinical sciences.
In terms of content, the contributions in basic sciences delve into the pathophysiology and mechanisms of autoimmune disorders, as well as genomics and proteomics. On the other hand, clinical contributions focus on diseases related to autoimmunity, novel therapies, and clinical associations.
Autoimmunity Reviews is internationally recognized, and its articles are indexed and abstracted in prestigious databases such as PubMed/Medline, Science Citation Index Expanded, Biosciences Information Services, and Chemical Abstracts.