{"title":"噻吩电子基态和两个最低三重态之间的芳香性和反芳香性逆转。","authors":"Edward Cummings, Peter B Karadakov","doi":"10.1002/cphc.202400758","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>It is shown, by examining the variations in off-nucleus isotropic magnetic shielding around a molecule, that thiophene which is aromatic in its electronic ground state (S<sub>0</sub>) becomes antiaromatic in its lowest triplet state (T<sub>1</sub>) and then reverts to being aromatic in T<sub>2</sub>. Geometry relaxation has an opposite effect on the aromaticities of the ππ* vertical T<sub>1</sub> and T<sub>2</sub>: The antiaromaticity of T<sub>1</sub> is reduced whereas the aromaticity of T<sub>2</sub> is enhanced. The shielding picture around T<sub>2</sub> is found to closely resemble those around certain second singlet ππ* excited states (S<sub>2</sub>), for example, those of benzene and cyclooctatetraene, thought to be \"strongly aromatic\" because of their very negative nucleus-independent chemical shift (NICS) values. It is argued that while NICS values correctly follow the changes in aromaticity along the potential energy surface of a single electronic state, the use of NICS values for the purpose of quantitative comparisons between the aromaticities of different electronic states cannot be justified theoretically and should be avoided. \"Strongly aromatic\" S<sub>2</sub> and T<sub>2</sub> states should be referred to simply as \"aromatic\" because detailed comparisons between the properties of these states and those of the corresponding S<sub>0</sub> states do not suggest higher levels of aromaticity.</p>","PeriodicalId":9819,"journal":{"name":"Chemphyschem","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Aromaticity and Antiaromaticity Reversals between the Electronic Ground State and the Two Lowest Triplet States of Thiophene.\",\"authors\":\"Edward Cummings, Peter B Karadakov\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/cphc.202400758\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>It is shown, by examining the variations in off-nucleus isotropic magnetic shielding around a molecule, that thiophene which is aromatic in its electronic ground state (S<sub>0</sub>) becomes antiaromatic in its lowest triplet state (T<sub>1</sub>) and then reverts to being aromatic in T<sub>2</sub>. Geometry relaxation has an opposite effect on the aromaticities of the ππ* vertical T<sub>1</sub> and T<sub>2</sub>: The antiaromaticity of T<sub>1</sub> is reduced whereas the aromaticity of T<sub>2</sub> is enhanced. The shielding picture around T<sub>2</sub> is found to closely resemble those around certain second singlet ππ* excited states (S<sub>2</sub>), for example, those of benzene and cyclooctatetraene, thought to be \\\"strongly aromatic\\\" because of their very negative nucleus-independent chemical shift (NICS) values. It is argued that while NICS values correctly follow the changes in aromaticity along the potential energy surface of a single electronic state, the use of NICS values for the purpose of quantitative comparisons between the aromaticities of different electronic states cannot be justified theoretically and should be avoided. \\\"Strongly aromatic\\\" S<sub>2</sub> and T<sub>2</sub> states should be referred to simply as \\\"aromatic\\\" because detailed comparisons between the properties of these states and those of the corresponding S<sub>0</sub> states do not suggest higher levels of aromaticity.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9819,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Chemphyschem\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Chemphyschem\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"92\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/cphc.202400758\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chemphyschem","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/cphc.202400758","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Aromaticity and Antiaromaticity Reversals between the Electronic Ground State and the Two Lowest Triplet States of Thiophene.
It is shown, by examining the variations in off-nucleus isotropic magnetic shielding around a molecule, that thiophene which is aromatic in its electronic ground state (S0) becomes antiaromatic in its lowest triplet state (T1) and then reverts to being aromatic in T2. Geometry relaxation has an opposite effect on the aromaticities of the ππ* vertical T1 and T2: The antiaromaticity of T1 is reduced whereas the aromaticity of T2 is enhanced. The shielding picture around T2 is found to closely resemble those around certain second singlet ππ* excited states (S2), for example, those of benzene and cyclooctatetraene, thought to be "strongly aromatic" because of their very negative nucleus-independent chemical shift (NICS) values. It is argued that while NICS values correctly follow the changes in aromaticity along the potential energy surface of a single electronic state, the use of NICS values for the purpose of quantitative comparisons between the aromaticities of different electronic states cannot be justified theoretically and should be avoided. "Strongly aromatic" S2 and T2 states should be referred to simply as "aromatic" because detailed comparisons between the properties of these states and those of the corresponding S0 states do not suggest higher levels of aromaticity.
期刊介绍:
ChemPhysChem is one of the leading chemistry/physics interdisciplinary journals (ISI Impact Factor 2018: 3.077) for physical chemistry and chemical physics. It is published on behalf of Chemistry Europe, an association of 16 European chemical societies.
ChemPhysChem is an international source for important primary and critical secondary information across the whole field of physical chemistry and chemical physics. It integrates this wide and flourishing field ranging from Solid State and Soft-Matter Research, Electro- and Photochemistry, Femtochemistry and Nanotechnology, Complex Systems, Single-Molecule Research, Clusters and Colloids, Catalysis and Surface Science, Biophysics and Physical Biochemistry, Atmospheric and Environmental Chemistry, and many more topics. ChemPhysChem is peer-reviewed.