奥马哈系统护理模式对腹膜透析患者营养状况的影响。

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Clinical nephrology Pub Date : 2024-11-01 DOI:10.5414/CN111385
Cen Zhang, Ruo Zhuang, Xiao-Lei Chen, Xiao-Dong Cao, Meng-Ting Xue
{"title":"奥马哈系统护理模式对腹膜透析患者营养状况的影响。","authors":"Cen Zhang, Ruo Zhuang, Xiao-Lei Chen, Xiao-Dong Cao, Meng-Ting Xue","doi":"10.5414/CN111385","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To construct and apply a risk screening and intervention system for malnutrition in peritoneal dialysis patients based on the Omaha System.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A total of 75 peritoneal dialysis patients were randomly divided into control (38 cases) and intervention group (37 cases). The control group received routine operation training and health education, and the intervention group implemented a nutritional management plan based on the Omaha System. The modified quantitative subjective comprehensive nutritional scale (MQSGA) score, kidney disease dietary compliance attitude (RAAQ) and behavior (RABQ) score, body mass index (BMI), serum albumin (ALB), prealbumin (PA), and hemoglobin (Hb) were observed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Before intervention, there was no significant difference in these indicators between the two groups (p > 0.05). After 6 months, the MQSGA score in the intervention group was significantly lower than that in the control group (p < 0.05). RAAQ score and RABQ score in the intervention group were higher than those in the control group and (p < 0.05), and the nutritional indicators in the intervention group, such as BMI, ALB, PA, and Hb, were higher than those in the control group (p < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A nutritional management plan based on the Omaha System can help improve the nutrition condition of peritoneal dialysis patients, and improve the dietary compliance of chronic kidney disease patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":10396,"journal":{"name":"Clinical nephrology","volume":" ","pages":"264-272"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Use of the Omaha System nursing model on nutritional status outcomes in peritoneal dialysis patients.\",\"authors\":\"Cen Zhang, Ruo Zhuang, Xiao-Lei Chen, Xiao-Dong Cao, Meng-Ting Xue\",\"doi\":\"10.5414/CN111385\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To construct and apply a risk screening and intervention system for malnutrition in peritoneal dialysis patients based on the Omaha System.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A total of 75 peritoneal dialysis patients were randomly divided into control (38 cases) and intervention group (37 cases). The control group received routine operation training and health education, and the intervention group implemented a nutritional management plan based on the Omaha System. The modified quantitative subjective comprehensive nutritional scale (MQSGA) score, kidney disease dietary compliance attitude (RAAQ) and behavior (RABQ) score, body mass index (BMI), serum albumin (ALB), prealbumin (PA), and hemoglobin (Hb) were observed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Before intervention, there was no significant difference in these indicators between the two groups (p > 0.05). After 6 months, the MQSGA score in the intervention group was significantly lower than that in the control group (p < 0.05). RAAQ score and RABQ score in the intervention group were higher than those in the control group and (p < 0.05), and the nutritional indicators in the intervention group, such as BMI, ALB, PA, and Hb, were higher than those in the control group (p < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A nutritional management plan based on the Omaha System can help improve the nutrition condition of peritoneal dialysis patients, and improve the dietary compliance of chronic kidney disease patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10396,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical nephrology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"264-272\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical nephrology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5414/CN111385\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical nephrology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5414/CN111385","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:根据奥马哈系统构建并应用腹膜透析患者营养不良风险筛查和干预系统:以奥马哈系统为基础,构建并应用腹膜透析患者营养不良风险筛查和干预系统:将 75 例腹膜透析患者随机分为对照组(38 例)和干预组(37 例)。对照组接受常规操作培训和健康教育,干预组实施基于奥马哈系统的营养管理计划。观察改良定量主观综合营养量表(MQSGA)评分、肾病饮食依从性态度(RAAQ)和行为(RABQ)评分、体重指数(BMI)、血清白蛋白(ALB)、前白蛋白(PA)和血红蛋白(Hb):结果:干预前,两组患者的上述指标无明显差异(P>0.05)。6 个月后,干预组的 MQSGA 评分明显低于对照组(P 结论:干预组的 MQSGA 评分明显高于对照组(P基于奥马哈系统的营养管理计划有助于改善腹膜透析患者的营养状况,提高慢性肾病患者的饮食依从性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Use of the Omaha System nursing model on nutritional status outcomes in peritoneal dialysis patients.

Objective: To construct and apply a risk screening and intervention system for malnutrition in peritoneal dialysis patients based on the Omaha System.

Materials and methods: A total of 75 peritoneal dialysis patients were randomly divided into control (38 cases) and intervention group (37 cases). The control group received routine operation training and health education, and the intervention group implemented a nutritional management plan based on the Omaha System. The modified quantitative subjective comprehensive nutritional scale (MQSGA) score, kidney disease dietary compliance attitude (RAAQ) and behavior (RABQ) score, body mass index (BMI), serum albumin (ALB), prealbumin (PA), and hemoglobin (Hb) were observed.

Results: Before intervention, there was no significant difference in these indicators between the two groups (p > 0.05). After 6 months, the MQSGA score in the intervention group was significantly lower than that in the control group (p < 0.05). RAAQ score and RABQ score in the intervention group were higher than those in the control group and (p < 0.05), and the nutritional indicators in the intervention group, such as BMI, ALB, PA, and Hb, were higher than those in the control group (p < 0.05).

Conclusion: A nutritional management plan based on the Omaha System can help improve the nutrition condition of peritoneal dialysis patients, and improve the dietary compliance of chronic kidney disease patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical nephrology
Clinical nephrology 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
9.10%
发文量
138
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Nephrology appears monthly and publishes manuscripts containing original material with emphasis on the following topics: prophylaxis, pathophysiology, immunology, diagnosis, therapy, experimental approaches and dialysis and transplantation.
期刊最新文献
Spontaneous remission of de novo membranous nephropathy in post-allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation patients: A report of two cases. Impact of depression on clinical outcomes of peritoneal dialysis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Renal involvement in genetic neurocutaneous syndromes. Drug-induced acute tubulointerstitial nephritis: Serial C-reactive protein measurements might predict the course of acute kidney injury. Microarray analysis of microRNA profiles for assessing the therapeutic effects of sodium thiosulfate on end-stage renal disease combined with coronary artery calcification.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1