性少数群体和性别少数群体的癌症临床试验注册与异性恋、同性别的人有区别吗?

IF 2 3区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL Contemporary clinical trials Pub Date : 2024-09-18 DOI:10.1016/j.cct.2024.107695
Ash B. Alpert , Juno Obedin-Maliver , Annie Gjelsvik , Siraj Amanullah , Theresa I. Shireman , John R. Blosnich
{"title":"性少数群体和性别少数群体的癌症临床试验注册与异性恋、同性别的人有区别吗?","authors":"Ash B. Alpert ,&nbsp;Juno Obedin-Maliver ,&nbsp;Annie Gjelsvik ,&nbsp;Siraj Amanullah ,&nbsp;Theresa I. Shireman ,&nbsp;John R. Blosnich","doi":"10.1016/j.cct.2024.107695","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Sexual and gender minority (SGM) people experience cancer disparities compared to heterosexual and cisgender (non-SGM) people and likely have barriers to cancer clinical trial enrollment. Data are sparse, however, regarding cancer clinical trial enrollment for SGM versus non-SGM people.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Using data from the 2020 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance Survey (BRFSS), we applied a logistic regression to assess associations between SGM status and clinical trial enrollment for 346 SGM and 9441 non-SGM people diagnosed with cancer. The model was adjusted for age at diagnosis, race/ethnicity, partnership status, education, employment, and sex assigned at birth.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>SGM individuals had 94 % greater odds than non-SGM individuals to report participation in a clinical trial (aOR 1.94; 95 % CI 1.02–3.68) after adjusting for other factors.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Data from the BRFSS suggest that SGM people with cancer have higher odds of clinical trial enrollment compared to non-SGM people with cancer. Future work is needed to prospectively track oncology treatment, including clinical trial participation, and outcomes of SGM people versus non-SGM people with cancer. Other studies will be needed to develop and implement systematic, consistent, and non-stigmatizing sexual orientation and gender identity data collection methods.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10636,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary clinical trials","volume":"146 ","pages":"Article 107695"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does cancer clinical trial enrollment for sexual and gender minority people differ from heterosexual, cisgender people?\",\"authors\":\"Ash B. Alpert ,&nbsp;Juno Obedin-Maliver ,&nbsp;Annie Gjelsvik ,&nbsp;Siraj Amanullah ,&nbsp;Theresa I. Shireman ,&nbsp;John R. Blosnich\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cct.2024.107695\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Sexual and gender minority (SGM) people experience cancer disparities compared to heterosexual and cisgender (non-SGM) people and likely have barriers to cancer clinical trial enrollment. Data are sparse, however, regarding cancer clinical trial enrollment for SGM versus non-SGM people.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Using data from the 2020 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance Survey (BRFSS), we applied a logistic regression to assess associations between SGM status and clinical trial enrollment for 346 SGM and 9441 non-SGM people diagnosed with cancer. The model was adjusted for age at diagnosis, race/ethnicity, partnership status, education, employment, and sex assigned at birth.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>SGM individuals had 94 % greater odds than non-SGM individuals to report participation in a clinical trial (aOR 1.94; 95 % CI 1.02–3.68) after adjusting for other factors.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Data from the BRFSS suggest that SGM people with cancer have higher odds of clinical trial enrollment compared to non-SGM people with cancer. Future work is needed to prospectively track oncology treatment, including clinical trial participation, and outcomes of SGM people versus non-SGM people with cancer. Other studies will be needed to develop and implement systematic, consistent, and non-stigmatizing sexual orientation and gender identity data collection methods.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10636,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Contemporary clinical trials\",\"volume\":\"146 \",\"pages\":\"Article 107695\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Contemporary clinical trials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1551714424002787\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contemporary clinical trials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1551714424002787","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:与异性恋和同性(非 SGM)人群相比,性少数群体和性别少数群体(SGM)人群在癌症治疗方面存在差异,他们在癌症临床试验注册方面可能存在障碍。然而,有关 SGM 与非 SGM 人癌症临床试验注册情况的数据却很少:利用 2020 年行为风险因素监测调查(BRFSS)的数据,我们对 346 名被诊断患有癌症的 SGM 和 9441 名非 SGM 患者进行了逻辑回归,以评估 SGM 状态与临床试验注册之间的关系。该模型根据诊断时的年龄、种族/民族、伴侣状况、教育程度、就业情况和出生时的性别进行了调整:结果:在对其他因素进行调整后,SGM 患者报告参与临床试验的几率比非 SGM 患者高 94%(aOR 1.94;95 % CI 1.02-3.68):来自 BRFSS 的数据表明,与非 SGM 癌症患者相比,SGM 癌症患者参加临床试验的几率更高。今后还需要开展工作,对 SGM 癌症患者与非 SGM 癌症患者的肿瘤治疗(包括临床试验的参与)和结果进行前瞻性跟踪。还需要开展其他研究,以制定和实施系统、一致、无污名化的性取向和性别认同数据收集方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Does cancer clinical trial enrollment for sexual and gender minority people differ from heterosexual, cisgender people?

Background

Sexual and gender minority (SGM) people experience cancer disparities compared to heterosexual and cisgender (non-SGM) people and likely have barriers to cancer clinical trial enrollment. Data are sparse, however, regarding cancer clinical trial enrollment for SGM versus non-SGM people.

Methods

Using data from the 2020 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance Survey (BRFSS), we applied a logistic regression to assess associations between SGM status and clinical trial enrollment for 346 SGM and 9441 non-SGM people diagnosed with cancer. The model was adjusted for age at diagnosis, race/ethnicity, partnership status, education, employment, and sex assigned at birth.

Results

SGM individuals had 94 % greater odds than non-SGM individuals to report participation in a clinical trial (aOR 1.94; 95 % CI 1.02–3.68) after adjusting for other factors.

Conclusions

Data from the BRFSS suggest that SGM people with cancer have higher odds of clinical trial enrollment compared to non-SGM people with cancer. Future work is needed to prospectively track oncology treatment, including clinical trial participation, and outcomes of SGM people versus non-SGM people with cancer. Other studies will be needed to develop and implement systematic, consistent, and non-stigmatizing sexual orientation and gender identity data collection methods.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
4.50%
发文量
281
审稿时长
44 days
期刊介绍: Contemporary Clinical Trials is an international peer reviewed journal that publishes manuscripts pertaining to all aspects of clinical trials, including, but not limited to, design, conduct, analysis, regulation and ethics. Manuscripts submitted should appeal to a readership drawn from disciplines including medicine, biostatistics, epidemiology, computer science, management science, behavioural science, pharmaceutical science, and bioethics. Full-length papers and short communications not exceeding 1,500 words, as well as systemic reviews of clinical trials and methodologies will be published. Perspectives/commentaries on current issues and the impact of clinical trials on the practice of medicine and health policy are also welcome.
期刊最新文献
Corrigendum to 'Integrative data analysis of clinical trials network studies to examine the impact of psychosocial treatments for Black people who use cocaine: Study protocol' [Contemporary Clinical Trials 133 (2023) 107329]. Increasing screening for breast cancer using a randomized evaluation of electronic health record nudges: Design and rationale of the I-screen clinical trial A new way to address missing data in late-stage clinical trials An evaluation of Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy for Avoidant/Restrictive Food Intake Disorder (CBT-AR) in a youth outpatient eating disorders service: A protocol paper Characteristics of VA hospitals by participation status in a large pragmatic embedded clinical trial
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1