虚拟教育对重症监护护士通过肠内喂养管给药的知识和实践的影响:前瞻性随机岗前干预研究》。

IF 1 Q4 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Critical Care Nursing Quarterly Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-13 DOI:10.1097/CNQ.0000000000000524
Elnaz Sabaghnejad, Naemeh Nikvarz, Monirsadat Nematollahi
{"title":"虚拟教育对重症监护护士通过肠内喂养管给药的知识和实践的影响:前瞻性随机岗前干预研究》。","authors":"Elnaz Sabaghnejad, Naemeh Nikvarz, Monirsadat Nematollahi","doi":"10.1097/CNQ.0000000000000524","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A study was conducted to evaluate the effect of virtual education on knowledge and practice of nurses regarding administration of drugs through enteral feeding tubes (EFTs). Sixty nurses working in 4 intensive care units were enrolled. A questionnaire evaluating knowledge and practice of nurses regarding drug administration through EFTs was used. At the pre-intervention stage, all nurses responded to the questionnaire. Then an educational videoclip was provided to the intervention group. One month later, post-intervention stage, both groups answered to the questionnaire again. At the end of the study, the scores of all items in the knowledge domain including medication preparation (mean difference [MD] [95% CI]: 1.11 [0.57; 1.66]), tube flushing (MD [95% CI]: 2.15 [1.59; 2.79]), recognizing drug-drug/drug-feed interactions (MD [95% CI]: 0.57 [0.05; 1.09]), and recognizing dosage forms (MD [95% CI]: 1.51 [0.94; 2.10]) and practice domain including medication preparation (MD [95% CI]: 1.63 [1.04; 2.21]), tube flushing (MD [95% CI]: 1.19 [0.64; 1.74]), and recognizing drug-drug/drug-feed interactions [MD (95% CI): 2.16 (1.53; 2.80)] in the intervention group were significantly higher than those in the control group (P < .05). Education of proper technics of preparation and administration of drugs through EFTs improved knowledge and practice of the participants.</p>","PeriodicalId":10789,"journal":{"name":"Critical Care Nursing Quarterly","volume":"47 4","pages":"286-295"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of Virtual Education on Knowledge and Practice of Critical Care Nurses Regarding the Administration of Drugs Through Enteral Feeding Tubes: A Prospective Randomized Pre-Post Intervention Study.\",\"authors\":\"Elnaz Sabaghnejad, Naemeh Nikvarz, Monirsadat Nematollahi\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/CNQ.0000000000000524\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>A study was conducted to evaluate the effect of virtual education on knowledge and practice of nurses regarding administration of drugs through enteral feeding tubes (EFTs). Sixty nurses working in 4 intensive care units were enrolled. A questionnaire evaluating knowledge and practice of nurses regarding drug administration through EFTs was used. At the pre-intervention stage, all nurses responded to the questionnaire. Then an educational videoclip was provided to the intervention group. One month later, post-intervention stage, both groups answered to the questionnaire again. At the end of the study, the scores of all items in the knowledge domain including medication preparation (mean difference [MD] [95% CI]: 1.11 [0.57; 1.66]), tube flushing (MD [95% CI]: 2.15 [1.59; 2.79]), recognizing drug-drug/drug-feed interactions (MD [95% CI]: 0.57 [0.05; 1.09]), and recognizing dosage forms (MD [95% CI]: 1.51 [0.94; 2.10]) and practice domain including medication preparation (MD [95% CI]: 1.63 [1.04; 2.21]), tube flushing (MD [95% CI]: 1.19 [0.64; 1.74]), and recognizing drug-drug/drug-feed interactions [MD (95% CI): 2.16 (1.53; 2.80)] in the intervention group were significantly higher than those in the control group (P < .05). Education of proper technics of preparation and administration of drugs through EFTs improved knowledge and practice of the participants.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10789,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Critical Care Nursing Quarterly\",\"volume\":\"47 4\",\"pages\":\"286-295\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Critical Care Nursing Quarterly\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/CNQ.0000000000000524\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/9/13 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Care Nursing Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CNQ.0000000000000524","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在评估虚拟教育对护士通过肠道喂食管(EFT)给药的知识和实践的影响。在 4 个重症监护病房工作的 60 名护士参加了这项研究。调查问卷用于评估护士对通过 EFT 给药的认识和实践。在干预前阶段,所有护士都回答了问卷。然后向干预组提供了教育视频短片。一个月后,即干预后阶段,两组护士再次回答问卷。研究结束时,包括药物准备(平均差 [MD] [95% CI]:1.11 [0.57; 1.66])、管道冲洗(MD [95% CI]:2.15 [1.59; 2.79])、识别药物与药物/药物与饲料之间的相互作用(MD [95% CI]:0.57 [0.05; 1.09])和识别剂型(MD [95% CI]:1.51[0.94;2.10])和实践领域包括药物准备(MD [95%CI]:1.63[1.04;2.21])、冲管(MD [95%CI]:1.19[0.64;1.74])和识别药物-药物/药物-饲料相互作用[MD (95%CI):2.16 (1.53;2.80)],干预组明显高于对照组(P.
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Effect of Virtual Education on Knowledge and Practice of Critical Care Nurses Regarding the Administration of Drugs Through Enteral Feeding Tubes: A Prospective Randomized Pre-Post Intervention Study.

A study was conducted to evaluate the effect of virtual education on knowledge and practice of nurses regarding administration of drugs through enteral feeding tubes (EFTs). Sixty nurses working in 4 intensive care units were enrolled. A questionnaire evaluating knowledge and practice of nurses regarding drug administration through EFTs was used. At the pre-intervention stage, all nurses responded to the questionnaire. Then an educational videoclip was provided to the intervention group. One month later, post-intervention stage, both groups answered to the questionnaire again. At the end of the study, the scores of all items in the knowledge domain including medication preparation (mean difference [MD] [95% CI]: 1.11 [0.57; 1.66]), tube flushing (MD [95% CI]: 2.15 [1.59; 2.79]), recognizing drug-drug/drug-feed interactions (MD [95% CI]: 0.57 [0.05; 1.09]), and recognizing dosage forms (MD [95% CI]: 1.51 [0.94; 2.10]) and practice domain including medication preparation (MD [95% CI]: 1.63 [1.04; 2.21]), tube flushing (MD [95% CI]: 1.19 [0.64; 1.74]), and recognizing drug-drug/drug-feed interactions [MD (95% CI): 2.16 (1.53; 2.80)] in the intervention group were significantly higher than those in the control group (P < .05). Education of proper technics of preparation and administration of drugs through EFTs improved knowledge and practice of the participants.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Critical Care Nursing Quarterly
Critical Care Nursing Quarterly CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE-
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
76
期刊介绍: Critical Care Nursing Quarterly (CCNQ) is a peer-reviewed journal that provides current practice-oriented information for the continuing education and improved clinical practice of critical care professionals, including nurses, physicians, and allied health care professionals.
期刊最新文献
Analysis of Nurses' Perceptions of Handover Practices: A Comparative Study in Different Medical Settings. Care Bundle Approach for Oral Health Maintenance and Reduction of Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia. Cryoanalgesia for Reducing Unconscious Patients' Pain During Arterial Puncture. Developing and Validating a Bundle for Safe Intra-Hospital Transporting of the Critically Ill Patients: Mixed Qualitative Design With Delphi Approach. Effect of the "aSSKINg" Model in Reducing Pressure Ulcer Risk: A Comparative Study Using the Braden Risk Assessment Score.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1