贝珠替凡对散发性转移性透明细胞肾细胞癌患者的疗效和耐受性

IF 4.8 2区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY European urology focus Pub Date : 2024-09-21 DOI:10.1016/j.euf.2024.09.007
Emily Wang, Eric S Rupe, Sagar S Mukhida, Andrew C Johns, Matthew T Campbell, Amishi Y Shah, Amado J Zurita, Jianjun Gao, Sangeeta Goswami, Eric Jonasch, Pavlos Msaouel, Nizar M Tannir, Andrew W Hahn
{"title":"贝珠替凡对散发性转移性透明细胞肾细胞癌患者的疗效和耐受性","authors":"Emily Wang, Eric S Rupe, Sagar S Mukhida, Andrew C Johns, Matthew T Campbell, Amishi Y Shah, Amado J Zurita, Jianjun Gao, Sangeeta Goswami, Eric Jonasch, Pavlos Msaouel, Nizar M Tannir, Andrew W Hahn","doi":"10.1016/j.euf.2024.09.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>Belzutifan, a hypoxia-inducible factor 2 alpha inhibitor, was approved initially for patients with von Hippel-Lindau disease and more recently for sporadic, metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) based on the results of LITESPARK-005. There is a paucity of data regarding real-world experience with belzutifan in patients with sporadic, metastatic ccRCC. This study aims to describe clinical outcomes with belzutifan in patients with sporadic, metastatic ccRCC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective study of 22 patients who received belzutifan at MD Anderson Cancer Center prior to the Food and Drug Administration approval was conducted. Progression-free survival (PFS) and objective response rate (ORR) were assessed by a blinded radiologist using Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1. PFS and overall survival (OS) were measured from belzutifan initiation.</p><p><strong>Key findings and limitations: </strong>The median follow-up time was 14.9 mo. Most patients had International Metastatic RCC Database Consortium intermediate-risk disease, more than three metastatic sites, and a median of five prior lines of treatment at initiation of belzutifan; all patients received prior immune checkpoint therapy (ICT) and vascular endothelial growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (VEGFR-TKIs). The median PFS was 8.51 mo (95% confidence interval [CI] 0-18.4) and ORR was 36.4%. The median OS was 14.72 mo (95% CI 7.34-22.10). Of 22 patients, four (18.2%) patients required dose reductions and three (13.6%) patients discontinued belzutifan because of adverse drug events (ADEs). The most common ADEs were anemia (77.3%; 17/22) and hypoxia (36.4%; 8/22). There were no treatment-related deaths.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and clinical implications: </strong>In a heavily pretreated cohort of patients with sporadic, metastatic ccRCC, belzutifan had meaningful clinical activity and was well tolerated. These real-world results add to the results of LITESPARK-005 and support the use of belzutifan after progression on ICT and VEGFR-TKIs.</p><p><strong>Patient summary: </strong>Belzutifan is a new medicine used to treat a type of clear cell kidney cancer that has spread to other parts of the body (metastasized). A study at MD Anderson Cancer Center followed 22 patients who were treated with belzutifan, and found that it worked to control the cancer for almost 9 mo and caused the cancer to shrink in 36% of patients. This study confirms that belzutifan can be effective and safe, even after other treatments have not worked.</p>","PeriodicalId":12160,"journal":{"name":"European urology focus","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Belzutifan Efficacy and Tolerability in Patients with Sporadic Metastatic Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma.\",\"authors\":\"Emily Wang, Eric S Rupe, Sagar S Mukhida, Andrew C Johns, Matthew T Campbell, Amishi Y Shah, Amado J Zurita, Jianjun Gao, Sangeeta Goswami, Eric Jonasch, Pavlos Msaouel, Nizar M Tannir, Andrew W Hahn\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.euf.2024.09.007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>Belzutifan, a hypoxia-inducible factor 2 alpha inhibitor, was approved initially for patients with von Hippel-Lindau disease and more recently for sporadic, metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) based on the results of LITESPARK-005. There is a paucity of data regarding real-world experience with belzutifan in patients with sporadic, metastatic ccRCC. This study aims to describe clinical outcomes with belzutifan in patients with sporadic, metastatic ccRCC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective study of 22 patients who received belzutifan at MD Anderson Cancer Center prior to the Food and Drug Administration approval was conducted. Progression-free survival (PFS) and objective response rate (ORR) were assessed by a blinded radiologist using Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1. PFS and overall survival (OS) were measured from belzutifan initiation.</p><p><strong>Key findings and limitations: </strong>The median follow-up time was 14.9 mo. Most patients had International Metastatic RCC Database Consortium intermediate-risk disease, more than three metastatic sites, and a median of five prior lines of treatment at initiation of belzutifan; all patients received prior immune checkpoint therapy (ICT) and vascular endothelial growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (VEGFR-TKIs). The median PFS was 8.51 mo (95% confidence interval [CI] 0-18.4) and ORR was 36.4%. The median OS was 14.72 mo (95% CI 7.34-22.10). Of 22 patients, four (18.2%) patients required dose reductions and three (13.6%) patients discontinued belzutifan because of adverse drug events (ADEs). The most common ADEs were anemia (77.3%; 17/22) and hypoxia (36.4%; 8/22). There were no treatment-related deaths.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and clinical implications: </strong>In a heavily pretreated cohort of patients with sporadic, metastatic ccRCC, belzutifan had meaningful clinical activity and was well tolerated. These real-world results add to the results of LITESPARK-005 and support the use of belzutifan after progression on ICT and VEGFR-TKIs.</p><p><strong>Patient summary: </strong>Belzutifan is a new medicine used to treat a type of clear cell kidney cancer that has spread to other parts of the body (metastasized). A study at MD Anderson Cancer Center followed 22 patients who were treated with belzutifan, and found that it worked to control the cancer for almost 9 mo and caused the cancer to shrink in 36% of patients. This study confirms that belzutifan can be effective and safe, even after other treatments have not worked.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12160,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European urology focus\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European urology focus\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euf.2024.09.007\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European urology focus","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euf.2024.09.007","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:贝珠替凡是一种低氧诱导因子 2 alpha 抑制剂,最初被批准用于治疗 von Hippel-Lindau 病,最近根据 LITESPARK-005 的结果又被批准用于治疗散发性、转移性透明细胞肾细胞癌(ccRCC)。有关贝珠替凡在散发性、转移性ccRCC患者中的实际应用经验的数据很少。本研究旨在描述散发性、转移性ccRCC患者使用贝珠替凡的临床结果:该研究对食品药品管理局批准之前在 MD 安德森癌症中心接受过贝珠替凡治疗的 22 名患者进行了回顾性研究。无进展生存期(PFS)和客观反应率(ORR)由双盲放射科医生使用实体瘤反应评估标准(RECIST)1.1版进行评估。PFS和总生存期(OS)从开始使用belzutifan起计算:中位随访时间为14.9个月。大多数患者患有国际转移性RCC数据库联盟的中危疾病,转移部位超过3个,开始接受贝珠单抗治疗时的中位治疗方案为5种;所有患者均接受过免疫检查点疗法(ICT)和血管内皮生长因子受体酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(VEGFR-TKIs)治疗。中位 PFS 为 8.51 个月(95% 置信区间 [CI] 0-18.4),ORR 为 36.4%。中位 OS 为 14.72 个月(95% 置信区间 [CI] 7.34-22.10)。在22名患者中,有4名(18.2%)患者需要减少剂量,3名(13.6%)患者因药物不良反应(ADEs)而停用了贝珠替凡。最常见的不良反应是贫血(77.3%;17/22)和缺氧(36.4%;8/22)。没有出现与治疗相关的死亡病例:在一组接受过大量预处理的散发性、转移性ccRCC患者中,belzutifan具有显著的临床活性,且耐受性良好。这些实际结果补充了LITESPARK-005的结果,支持在ICT和VEGFR-TKIs治疗进展后使用贝珠替凡。患者总结:贝珠替凡是一种新药,用于治疗一种已扩散到身体其他部位(转移)的透明细胞肾癌。MD 安德森癌症中心的一项研究对22名接受贝珠替凡治疗的患者进行了跟踪调查,结果发现贝珠替凡可控制癌症近9个月,并使36%的患者的癌症缩小。这项研究证实,即使在其他治疗方法无效的情况下,belzutifan 仍然有效且安全。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Belzutifan Efficacy and Tolerability in Patients with Sporadic Metastatic Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma.

Background and objective: Belzutifan, a hypoxia-inducible factor 2 alpha inhibitor, was approved initially for patients with von Hippel-Lindau disease and more recently for sporadic, metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) based on the results of LITESPARK-005. There is a paucity of data regarding real-world experience with belzutifan in patients with sporadic, metastatic ccRCC. This study aims to describe clinical outcomes with belzutifan in patients with sporadic, metastatic ccRCC.

Methods: A retrospective study of 22 patients who received belzutifan at MD Anderson Cancer Center prior to the Food and Drug Administration approval was conducted. Progression-free survival (PFS) and objective response rate (ORR) were assessed by a blinded radiologist using Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1. PFS and overall survival (OS) were measured from belzutifan initiation.

Key findings and limitations: The median follow-up time was 14.9 mo. Most patients had International Metastatic RCC Database Consortium intermediate-risk disease, more than three metastatic sites, and a median of five prior lines of treatment at initiation of belzutifan; all patients received prior immune checkpoint therapy (ICT) and vascular endothelial growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (VEGFR-TKIs). The median PFS was 8.51 mo (95% confidence interval [CI] 0-18.4) and ORR was 36.4%. The median OS was 14.72 mo (95% CI 7.34-22.10). Of 22 patients, four (18.2%) patients required dose reductions and three (13.6%) patients discontinued belzutifan because of adverse drug events (ADEs). The most common ADEs were anemia (77.3%; 17/22) and hypoxia (36.4%; 8/22). There were no treatment-related deaths.

Conclusions and clinical implications: In a heavily pretreated cohort of patients with sporadic, metastatic ccRCC, belzutifan had meaningful clinical activity and was well tolerated. These real-world results add to the results of LITESPARK-005 and support the use of belzutifan after progression on ICT and VEGFR-TKIs.

Patient summary: Belzutifan is a new medicine used to treat a type of clear cell kidney cancer that has spread to other parts of the body (metastasized). A study at MD Anderson Cancer Center followed 22 patients who were treated with belzutifan, and found that it worked to control the cancer for almost 9 mo and caused the cancer to shrink in 36% of patients. This study confirms that belzutifan can be effective and safe, even after other treatments have not worked.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
European urology focus
European urology focus Medicine-Urology
CiteScore
10.40
自引率
3.70%
发文量
274
审稿时长
23 days
期刊介绍: European Urology Focus is a new sister journal to European Urology and an official publication of the European Association of Urology (EAU). EU Focus will publish original articles, opinion piece editorials and topical reviews on a wide range of urological issues such as oncology, functional urology, reconstructive urology, laparoscopy, robotic surgery, endourology, female urology, andrology, paediatric urology and sexual medicine. The editorial team welcome basic and translational research articles in the field of urological diseases. Authors may be solicited by the Editor directly. All submitted manuscripts will be peer-reviewed by a panel of experts before being considered for publication.
期刊最新文献
Belzutifan Efficacy and Tolerability in Patients with Sporadic Metastatic Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma. Clinical Impact of the CARMENA Trial on Cytoreductive Nephrectomy Practices in the USA: A Difference-in-differences Analysis. Comparative Effectiveness of Bacillus Calmette-Guérin and Sequential Intravesical Gemcitabine and Docetaxel for Treatment-naïve Intermediate-risk Non-muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer. Learning Curve for Single-port Robot-assisted Urological Surgery: Single-center Experience and Implications for Adoption. Stapled W-shaped (Hautmann) Orthotopic Ileal Neobladder. Functional Results and Complications over a 13-year Period.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1