同性女性夫妇共同受孕生殖技术的系统回顾。

IF 6.6 1区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Fertility and sterility Pub Date : 2024-11-01 DOI:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2024.09.008
Bethany Dubois B.A. , Hajer Naveed B.A. , Katrina S. Nietsch M.S. , Isabelle C. Band B.A. , Pedro Brandão M.D., Ph.D., E.F.O.G., E.F.R.M. , Samantha L. Estevez M.D.
{"title":"同性女性夫妇共同受孕生殖技术的系统回顾。","authors":"Bethany Dubois B.A. ,&nbsp;Hajer Naveed B.A. ,&nbsp;Katrina S. Nietsch M.S. ,&nbsp;Isabelle C. Band B.A. ,&nbsp;Pedro Brandão M.D., Ph.D., E.F.O.G., E.F.R.M. ,&nbsp;Samantha L. Estevez M.D.","doi":"10.1016/j.fertnstert.2024.09.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Reciprocal in vitro fertilization (IVF) and intravaginal culture (IVC) are two technologies that allow same-sex female couples to jointly contribute biologically to a pregnancy. This systematic review aimed to synthesize the clinical outcomes of each method including live birth rate, clinical pregnancy rate, embryo quality, and perinatal complications. A dual-reviewer protocol identified eight studies on reciprocal IVF and ten studies on IVC. In retrospective studies reporting on a total of 1,405 reciprocal IVF cycles, reciprocal IVF has demonstrated similar cycle and pregnancy outcomes to autologous IVF. One study that reported on pregnancy complications found a comparable rate of hypertensive disease in pregnancy between patients undergoing reciprocal IVF and intrauterine insemination. However, a lack of prospective studies on reciprocal IVF limits the generalizability of these results. Overall, small prospective and retrospective studies reporting on a total of 776 IVC cycles show that IVC offers good cycle and pregnancy outcomes, comparable to IVF. However, randomized prospective studies reported that the rate of quality embryo creation in IVC may be lower than in IVF. Although both reciprocal IVF and IVC show promise for same-sex female couples and the larger lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, intersex, asexual, and other sexual or gender minorities community, this review has highlighted the need for larger, prospective, more diverse studies on methods of shared biological contribution for family building.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12275,"journal":{"name":"Fertility and sterility","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A systematic review of reproductive technologies for shared conception in same-sex female couples\",\"authors\":\"Bethany Dubois B.A. ,&nbsp;Hajer Naveed B.A. ,&nbsp;Katrina S. Nietsch M.S. ,&nbsp;Isabelle C. Band B.A. ,&nbsp;Pedro Brandão M.D., Ph.D., E.F.O.G., E.F.R.M. ,&nbsp;Samantha L. Estevez M.D.\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.fertnstert.2024.09.008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Reciprocal in vitro fertilization (IVF) and intravaginal culture (IVC) are two technologies that allow same-sex female couples to jointly contribute biologically to a pregnancy. This systematic review aimed to synthesize the clinical outcomes of each method including live birth rate, clinical pregnancy rate, embryo quality, and perinatal complications. A dual-reviewer protocol identified eight studies on reciprocal IVF and ten studies on IVC. In retrospective studies reporting on a total of 1,405 reciprocal IVF cycles, reciprocal IVF has demonstrated similar cycle and pregnancy outcomes to autologous IVF. One study that reported on pregnancy complications found a comparable rate of hypertensive disease in pregnancy between patients undergoing reciprocal IVF and intrauterine insemination. However, a lack of prospective studies on reciprocal IVF limits the generalizability of these results. Overall, small prospective and retrospective studies reporting on a total of 776 IVC cycles show that IVC offers good cycle and pregnancy outcomes, comparable to IVF. However, randomized prospective studies reported that the rate of quality embryo creation in IVC may be lower than in IVF. Although both reciprocal IVF and IVC show promise for same-sex female couples and the larger lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, intersex, asexual, and other sexual or gender minorities community, this review has highlighted the need for larger, prospective, more diverse studies on methods of shared biological contribution for family building.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12275,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Fertility and sterility\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Fertility and sterility\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0015028224022210\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fertility and sterility","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0015028224022210","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

互惠体外受精(IVF)和阴道内培养(IVC)是允许同性女性夫妇共同为怀孕做出生物贡献的两种技术。本系统性综述旨在综合每种方法的临床结果,包括活产率、临床妊娠率、胚胎质量和围产期并发症。双审稿人协议确定了 8 项关于互惠试管婴儿的研究和 10 项关于 IVC 的研究。回顾性研究共报告了 1405 个往复式试管婴儿周期,其中往复式试管婴儿的周期和妊娠结果与自体试管婴儿相似。一项关于妊娠并发症的研究发现,接受交互式试管婴儿和宫腔内人工授精的患者发生妊娠高血压疾病的比例相当。然而,由于缺乏对相互试管婴儿的前瞻性研究,这些结果的普遍性受到了限制。总体而言,对总共 776 个宫腔内人工授精周期进行报告的小型前瞻性和回顾性研究表明,宫腔内人工授精可提供良好的周期和妊娠结果,与体外受精不相上下。不过,随机前瞻性研究报告称,IVC 的优质胚胎生成率可能低于试管婴儿。虽然互惠试管婴儿和 IVC 都为同性女性夫妇和更广泛的 LGBTQIA+(女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋、变性人、双性人、无性人和其他性或性别少数群体)群体带来了希望,但本综述强调,需要对建立家庭的共同生物贡献方法进行更大规模、前瞻性和更多样化的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A systematic review of reproductive technologies for shared conception in same-sex female couples
Reciprocal in vitro fertilization (IVF) and intravaginal culture (IVC) are two technologies that allow same-sex female couples to jointly contribute biologically to a pregnancy. This systematic review aimed to synthesize the clinical outcomes of each method including live birth rate, clinical pregnancy rate, embryo quality, and perinatal complications. A dual-reviewer protocol identified eight studies on reciprocal IVF and ten studies on IVC. In retrospective studies reporting on a total of 1,405 reciprocal IVF cycles, reciprocal IVF has demonstrated similar cycle and pregnancy outcomes to autologous IVF. One study that reported on pregnancy complications found a comparable rate of hypertensive disease in pregnancy between patients undergoing reciprocal IVF and intrauterine insemination. However, a lack of prospective studies on reciprocal IVF limits the generalizability of these results. Overall, small prospective and retrospective studies reporting on a total of 776 IVC cycles show that IVC offers good cycle and pregnancy outcomes, comparable to IVF. However, randomized prospective studies reported that the rate of quality embryo creation in IVC may be lower than in IVF. Although both reciprocal IVF and IVC show promise for same-sex female couples and the larger lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, intersex, asexual, and other sexual or gender minorities community, this review has highlighted the need for larger, prospective, more diverse studies on methods of shared biological contribution for family building.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Fertility and sterility
Fertility and sterility 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
11.30
自引率
6.00%
发文量
1446
审稿时长
31 days
期刊介绍: Fertility and Sterility® is an international journal for obstetricians, gynecologists, reproductive endocrinologists, urologists, basic scientists and others who treat and investigate problems of infertility and human reproductive disorders. The journal publishes juried original scientific articles in clinical and laboratory research relevant to reproductive endocrinology, urology, andrology, physiology, immunology, genetics, contraception, and menopause. Fertility and Sterility® encourages and supports meaningful basic and clinical research, and facilitates and promotes excellence in professional education, in the field of reproductive medicine.
期刊最新文献
Human embryos with segmental aneuploidies display delayed early development: a multi-centre morphokinetic analysis. Pharmacological and Surgical Strategies to Improve Cryopreserved Ovarian Tissue Transplantation Longevity and Outcomes. Editorial Board Table of Contents When should assisted reproductive technology workups be performed: following a tiered approach or all on day 1?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1