比较从腹泻患者中分离出的艰难梭菌菌株的毒素基因表达水平和分子分型。

Leili Shokoohizadeh, Mahnaz Moomivand, Abbas Yadegar, Masoumeh Azimirad, Seyyed Hamid Hashemi, Mohammad Yousef Alikhani
{"title":"比较从腹泻患者中分离出的艰难梭菌菌株的毒素基因表达水平和分子分型。","authors":"Leili Shokoohizadeh, Mahnaz Moomivand, Abbas Yadegar, Masoumeh Azimirad, Seyyed Hamid Hashemi, Mohammad Yousef Alikhani","doi":"10.22037/ghfbb.v17i3.2982","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the expression of <i>tcd</i>A, <i>tcd</i>B, and binary toxin genes (<i>cdt</i>A and <i>cdt</i>B) by Real-Time PCR and molecular typing of <i>Clostridioides difficile</i> isolated from patient diarrhea samples from Hamadan Hospitals, west of Iran.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>The concentration of <i>C. difficile</i> toxins (CDTs) is associated with the severity of the disease and the mortality rate. Measuring CDT levels could provide a reliable and objective means of determining the severity of <i>C. difficile</i> infection (CDI).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From November 2018 to September 2019, 130 diarrhea samples were collected from hospitalized patients in three hospitals in Hamadan. <i>C. difficle</i> isolates were detected by culture and PCR. The presence of the genes encoding the toxin was identified by PCR, whereas the measurement of toxin expression was conducted using a relative Real-Time PCR technique. Genetic linkage of the isolates was also assessed by Ribotyping and Repetitive Extragenic Palindromic (rep-PCR) methods.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 130 diarrhea samples, 16 (12.3%) were positive for <i>C. difficile</i>. Genes encoding <i>cdt</i>A and <i>tcd</i>B were detected in all isolates, and 8 (50%) and 6 (37.5%) isolates were positive for the <i>cdt</i>A and <i>cdt</i>B genes. Real-time PCR results showed different expression levels of the toxin genes. A significant increase in the expression of the <i>tcd</i>A gene was observed compared with the control strain (P<0.05). Besides, more expression of <i>cdt</i>A gene was observed in the strains compared with <i>cdt</i>B gene. Ribotyping and rep-PCR results showed high genetic diversity of <i>C. difficile</i> among hospitals investigated.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We encountered toxigenic <i>C. difficile</i> strains with various toxin expression levels, ribotypes, and rep types based on the findings of this study. This indicated that various clones from various sources circulate in the hospitals and among patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":12636,"journal":{"name":"Gastroenterology and Hepatology From Bed to Bench","volume":"17 3","pages":"304-312"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11413378/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of toxin gene expression levels and molecular typing of <i>Clostridioides difficile</i> strains isolated from patients with diarrhea.\",\"authors\":\"Leili Shokoohizadeh, Mahnaz Moomivand, Abbas Yadegar, Masoumeh Azimirad, Seyyed Hamid Hashemi, Mohammad Yousef Alikhani\",\"doi\":\"10.22037/ghfbb.v17i3.2982\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the expression of <i>tcd</i>A, <i>tcd</i>B, and binary toxin genes (<i>cdt</i>A and <i>cdt</i>B) by Real-Time PCR and molecular typing of <i>Clostridioides difficile</i> isolated from patient diarrhea samples from Hamadan Hospitals, west of Iran.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>The concentration of <i>C. difficile</i> toxins (CDTs) is associated with the severity of the disease and the mortality rate. Measuring CDT levels could provide a reliable and objective means of determining the severity of <i>C. difficile</i> infection (CDI).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From November 2018 to September 2019, 130 diarrhea samples were collected from hospitalized patients in three hospitals in Hamadan. <i>C. difficle</i> isolates were detected by culture and PCR. The presence of the genes encoding the toxin was identified by PCR, whereas the measurement of toxin expression was conducted using a relative Real-Time PCR technique. Genetic linkage of the isolates was also assessed by Ribotyping and Repetitive Extragenic Palindromic (rep-PCR) methods.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 130 diarrhea samples, 16 (12.3%) were positive for <i>C. difficile</i>. Genes encoding <i>cdt</i>A and <i>tcd</i>B were detected in all isolates, and 8 (50%) and 6 (37.5%) isolates were positive for the <i>cdt</i>A and <i>cdt</i>B genes. Real-time PCR results showed different expression levels of the toxin genes. A significant increase in the expression of the <i>tcd</i>A gene was observed compared with the control strain (P<0.05). Besides, more expression of <i>cdt</i>A gene was observed in the strains compared with <i>cdt</i>B gene. Ribotyping and rep-PCR results showed high genetic diversity of <i>C. difficile</i> among hospitals investigated.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We encountered toxigenic <i>C. difficile</i> strains with various toxin expression levels, ribotypes, and rep types based on the findings of this study. This indicated that various clones from various sources circulate in the hospitals and among patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12636,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Gastroenterology and Hepatology From Bed to Bench\",\"volume\":\"17 3\",\"pages\":\"304-312\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11413378/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Gastroenterology and Hepatology From Bed to Bench\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22037/ghfbb.v17i3.2982\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gastroenterology and Hepatology From Bed to Bench","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22037/ghfbb.v17i3.2982","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在通过 Real-Time PCR 评估从伊朗西部哈马丹医院患者腹泻样本中分离出的艰难梭菌的 tcdA、tcdB 和二元毒素基因(cttA 和 cdtB)的表达情况,并对其进行分子分型:背景:艰难梭菌毒素(CDTs)的浓度与疾病的严重程度和死亡率有关。测量 CDT 水平可为确定艰难梭菌感染(CDI)的严重程度提供一种可靠而客观的方法:从 2018 年 11 月到 2019 年 9 月,从哈马丹市三家医院的住院患者中收集了 130 份腹泻样本。通过培养和 PCR 检测艰难梭菌分离株。通过 PCR 鉴定编码毒素基因的存在,而毒素表达的测量则采用相对实时 PCR 技术进行。此外,还采用核糖分型法和重复外源共线性(rep-PCR)法评估了分离物的遗传联系:结果:在 130 份腹泻样本中,16 份(12.3%)对艰难梭菌呈阳性。所有分离株中都检测到了编码 cdtA 和 tcdB 的基因,其中分别有 8 株(50%)和 6 株(37.5%)分离株的 cdtA 和 cdtB 基因呈阳性。实时 PCR 结果显示毒素基因的表达水平不同。与对照菌株相比,观察到 tcdA 基因的表达量明显增加(与 cdtB 基因相比,在菌株中观察到 PcdtA 基因的表达量明显增加)。核糖分型和 rep-PCR 结果表明,在所调查的医院中,艰难梭菌的遗传多样性很高:结论:根据本研究的结果,我们发现了具有不同毒素表达水平、核型和 rep 类型的致毒艰难梭菌菌株。这表明,来自不同来源的各种克隆在医院和患者中流通。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparison of toxin gene expression levels and molecular typing of Clostridioides difficile strains isolated from patients with diarrhea.

Aim: This study aimed to evaluate the expression of tcdA, tcdB, and binary toxin genes (cdtA and cdtB) by Real-Time PCR and molecular typing of Clostridioides difficile isolated from patient diarrhea samples from Hamadan Hospitals, west of Iran.

Background: The concentration of C. difficile toxins (CDTs) is associated with the severity of the disease and the mortality rate. Measuring CDT levels could provide a reliable and objective means of determining the severity of C. difficile infection (CDI).

Methods: From November 2018 to September 2019, 130 diarrhea samples were collected from hospitalized patients in three hospitals in Hamadan. C. difficle isolates were detected by culture and PCR. The presence of the genes encoding the toxin was identified by PCR, whereas the measurement of toxin expression was conducted using a relative Real-Time PCR technique. Genetic linkage of the isolates was also assessed by Ribotyping and Repetitive Extragenic Palindromic (rep-PCR) methods.

Results: Among 130 diarrhea samples, 16 (12.3%) were positive for C. difficile. Genes encoding cdtA and tcdB were detected in all isolates, and 8 (50%) and 6 (37.5%) isolates were positive for the cdtA and cdtB genes. Real-time PCR results showed different expression levels of the toxin genes. A significant increase in the expression of the tcdA gene was observed compared with the control strain (P<0.05). Besides, more expression of cdtA gene was observed in the strains compared with cdtB gene. Ribotyping and rep-PCR results showed high genetic diversity of C. difficile among hospitals investigated.

Conclusion: We encountered toxigenic C. difficile strains with various toxin expression levels, ribotypes, and rep types based on the findings of this study. This indicated that various clones from various sources circulate in the hospitals and among patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
期刊最新文献
Posterior tibial nerve electrical stimulation in chronic constipation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Small fiber neuropathy in irritable bowel syndrome. Biguanides and glucagon like peptide 1 receptor agonists in the amelioration of post liver transplant weight gain; a scoping review of the mechanism of action, safety and efficacy. Design and development of a self-care application for patients with liver cirrhosis. Evaluation strategy of anti-mitochondrial antibodies M2-negative: the role of multiplex rodent tissues and related clinical implications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1