开发眼肌刺激系统并优化用于麻痹性斜视治疗的电刺激参数。

IF 4.4 2区 医学 Q2 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering Pub Date : 2024-09-16 DOI:10.1109/TBME.2024.3460814
Kyeongho Eom, Han-Sol Lee, Minju Park, Seung Min Yang, Jong Chan Choe, Suk-Won Hwang, Young-Woo Suh, Hyung-Min Lee
{"title":"开发眼肌刺激系统并优化用于麻痹性斜视治疗的电刺激参数。","authors":"Kyeongho Eom, Han-Sol Lee, Minju Park, Seung Min Yang, Jong Chan Choe, Suk-Won Hwang, Young-Woo Suh, Hyung-Min Lee","doi":"10.1109/TBME.2024.3460814","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Paralysis of the extraocular muscles can lead to complications such as strabismus, diplopia, and loss of stereopsis. Current surgical treatments aim to mitigate these issues by resecting the paralyzed muscle or transposing the other recti muscles to the paralyzed muscle, but they do not fully improve the patient's quality of life. Electrical stimulation shows promise, while requiring further in vivo experiments and research on various stimulation parameters. In this study, we conducted experiments on rabbits to stimulate the superior rectus (SR) muscles using different parameters and stimulation waveforms. To provide various types of electrical stimulation, we developed the ocular muscle stimulation systems capable of both current controlled stimulation (CCS) and high-frequency stimulation (HFS), along with the chip that enables energy-efficient and safe switched-capacitor stimulation (SCS). We also developed electrodes for easy implantation and employed safe and efficient stimulation methods including CCS, SCS, and HFS. The in vivo animal experiments on normal and paralyzed SR muscles of rabbits showed that eyeball abduction angles were proportional to the current and pulse width of the stimulation. With the decaying exponential stimuli of the SCS system, eyeball abductions were 2.58× and 5.65× larger for normal and paralyzed muscles, respectively, compared to the rectangular stimulus of CCS. HFS achieved 0.92× and 0.26× abduction for normal and paralyzed muscles, respectively, with half energy compared to CCS. In addition, the continuous changes in eyeball abduction angle in response to varying stimulation intensity over time were observed.</p>","PeriodicalId":13245,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering","volume":"PP ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development of Ocular Muscle Stimulation Systems and Optimization of Electrical Stimulus Parameters for Paralytic Strabismus Treatment.\",\"authors\":\"Kyeongho Eom, Han-Sol Lee, Minju Park, Seung Min Yang, Jong Chan Choe, Suk-Won Hwang, Young-Woo Suh, Hyung-Min Lee\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/TBME.2024.3460814\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Paralysis of the extraocular muscles can lead to complications such as strabismus, diplopia, and loss of stereopsis. Current surgical treatments aim to mitigate these issues by resecting the paralyzed muscle or transposing the other recti muscles to the paralyzed muscle, but they do not fully improve the patient's quality of life. Electrical stimulation shows promise, while requiring further in vivo experiments and research on various stimulation parameters. In this study, we conducted experiments on rabbits to stimulate the superior rectus (SR) muscles using different parameters and stimulation waveforms. To provide various types of electrical stimulation, we developed the ocular muscle stimulation systems capable of both current controlled stimulation (CCS) and high-frequency stimulation (HFS), along with the chip that enables energy-efficient and safe switched-capacitor stimulation (SCS). We also developed electrodes for easy implantation and employed safe and efficient stimulation methods including CCS, SCS, and HFS. The in vivo animal experiments on normal and paralyzed SR muscles of rabbits showed that eyeball abduction angles were proportional to the current and pulse width of the stimulation. With the decaying exponential stimuli of the SCS system, eyeball abductions were 2.58× and 5.65× larger for normal and paralyzed muscles, respectively, compared to the rectangular stimulus of CCS. HFS achieved 0.92× and 0.26× abduction for normal and paralyzed muscles, respectively, with half energy compared to CCS. In addition, the continuous changes in eyeball abduction angle in response to varying stimulation intensity over time were observed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13245,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering\",\"volume\":\"PP \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/TBME.2024.3460814\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/TBME.2024.3460814","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

眼外肌麻痹可导致斜视、复视和立体视丧失等并发症。目前的手术治疗方法旨在通过切除瘫痪肌肉或将其他直肌移位到瘫痪肌肉来缓解这些问题,但这些方法并不能完全改善患者的生活质量。电刺激显示了前景,但需要进一步的体内实验和对各种刺激参数的研究。在这项研究中,我们在兔子身上进行了实验,使用不同的参数和刺激波形刺激上直肌。为了提供各种类型的电刺激,我们开发了能同时进行电流控制刺激(CCS)和高频刺激(HFS)的眼肌刺激系统,以及能进行节能、安全的开关电容刺激(SCS)的芯片。我们还开发了易于植入的电极,并采用了安全高效的刺激方法,包括 CCS、SCS 和 HFS。对正常和麻痹的兔子 SR 肌肉进行的活体动物实验表明,眼球外展角度与刺激的电流和脉冲宽度成正比。与 CCS 的矩形刺激相比,在 SCS 系统的衰减指数刺激下,正常肌肉和麻痹肌肉的眼球外展分别增加了 2.58 倍和 5.65 倍。与 CCS 相比,HFS 以一半的能量使正常肌肉和麻痹肌肉的眼球外展分别达到 0.92 倍和 0.26 倍。此外,还观察到眼球外展角度随着刺激强度的变化而不断变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Development of Ocular Muscle Stimulation Systems and Optimization of Electrical Stimulus Parameters for Paralytic Strabismus Treatment.

Paralysis of the extraocular muscles can lead to complications such as strabismus, diplopia, and loss of stereopsis. Current surgical treatments aim to mitigate these issues by resecting the paralyzed muscle or transposing the other recti muscles to the paralyzed muscle, but they do not fully improve the patient's quality of life. Electrical stimulation shows promise, while requiring further in vivo experiments and research on various stimulation parameters. In this study, we conducted experiments on rabbits to stimulate the superior rectus (SR) muscles using different parameters and stimulation waveforms. To provide various types of electrical stimulation, we developed the ocular muscle stimulation systems capable of both current controlled stimulation (CCS) and high-frequency stimulation (HFS), along with the chip that enables energy-efficient and safe switched-capacitor stimulation (SCS). We also developed electrodes for easy implantation and employed safe and efficient stimulation methods including CCS, SCS, and HFS. The in vivo animal experiments on normal and paralyzed SR muscles of rabbits showed that eyeball abduction angles were proportional to the current and pulse width of the stimulation. With the decaying exponential stimuli of the SCS system, eyeball abductions were 2.58× and 5.65× larger for normal and paralyzed muscles, respectively, compared to the rectangular stimulus of CCS. HFS achieved 0.92× and 0.26× abduction for normal and paralyzed muscles, respectively, with half energy compared to CCS. In addition, the continuous changes in eyeball abduction angle in response to varying stimulation intensity over time were observed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering
IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering 工程技术-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
4.30%
发文量
880
审稿时长
2.5 months
期刊介绍: IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering contains basic and applied papers dealing with biomedical engineering. Papers range from engineering development in methods and techniques with biomedical applications to experimental and clinical investigations with engineering contributions.
期刊最新文献
Table of Contents Front Cover IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering Handling Editors Information IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society Information IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering Information for Authors
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1