调查治疗教育对 1 型糖尿病儿童和青少年血糖控制和生活质量的影响:非随机对照研究。

IF 1.4 Q3 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES Journal of Education and Health Promotion Pub Date : 2024-07-11 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.4103/jehp.jehp_1258_23
Hanaâ Ait-Taleb Lahsen, Mohammed El Amine Ragala, Karima Halim, Hanane El Abed, Amal Bouaazzaoui, Yasmine Zarrouk, Btissame Zarrouq
{"title":"调查治疗教育对 1 型糖尿病儿童和青少年血糖控制和生活质量的影响:非随机对照研究。","authors":"Hanaâ Ait-Taleb Lahsen, Mohammed El Amine Ragala, Karima Halim, Hanane El Abed, Amal Bouaazzaoui, Yasmine Zarrouk, Btissame Zarrouq","doi":"10.4103/jehp.jehp_1258_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Type-1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) is one of the most dreaded chronic diseases, especially in children or youth. To help patients and their families effectively manage their disease, structured therapeutic patient education (TPE) is essential.</p><p><strong>Materials and method: </strong>The purpose of this non-randomized before and after controlled study was to assess TPE program effects. In total, 200 T1DM children and adolescents, aged 8-18 years, selected from two pediatric departments, were equally assigned to the intervention and control groups. The primary endpoints were differences between groups at 3 months follow-up in measured HbA1c and health-related quality of life (QoL) assessed by a validated questionnaire.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At 3 months follow-up of a TPE intervention for T1DM children and adolescents, although there was no significant change in HbA1c for both groups, a significant improvement was observed in the maximum pre- and postprandial blood glucose levels (r: ~0.3; variation rates: -10,47% and -3,85%, respectively) in the intervention group, whereas there was a significant increase in the maximum and minimum of preprandial blood glucose levels in the control group (r: ~0.3, variation rates: 14.29% and 25%, respectively). Global and dimensional QoL mean scores variation rates showed a significant difference between groups, with an improvement in the intervention group (r ≥ 0.7, Cohen's > 0.8) and a decrease in the control group (r ≥ 0.7).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These results support the hypotheses of difference between the study groups in favor of better glycemic control and QoL for the intervention group.</p>","PeriodicalId":15581,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Education and Health Promotion","volume":"13 ","pages":"228"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11410240/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Investigation of the therapeutic education effect on glycemic control and quality of life of children and adolescents with type-1 diabetes mellitus: A non-randomized controlled study.\",\"authors\":\"Hanaâ Ait-Taleb Lahsen, Mohammed El Amine Ragala, Karima Halim, Hanane El Abed, Amal Bouaazzaoui, Yasmine Zarrouk, Btissame Zarrouq\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/jehp.jehp_1258_23\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Type-1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) is one of the most dreaded chronic diseases, especially in children or youth. To help patients and their families effectively manage their disease, structured therapeutic patient education (TPE) is essential.</p><p><strong>Materials and method: </strong>The purpose of this non-randomized before and after controlled study was to assess TPE program effects. In total, 200 T1DM children and adolescents, aged 8-18 years, selected from two pediatric departments, were equally assigned to the intervention and control groups. The primary endpoints were differences between groups at 3 months follow-up in measured HbA1c and health-related quality of life (QoL) assessed by a validated questionnaire.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At 3 months follow-up of a TPE intervention for T1DM children and adolescents, although there was no significant change in HbA1c for both groups, a significant improvement was observed in the maximum pre- and postprandial blood glucose levels (r: ~0.3; variation rates: -10,47% and -3,85%, respectively) in the intervention group, whereas there was a significant increase in the maximum and minimum of preprandial blood glucose levels in the control group (r: ~0.3, variation rates: 14.29% and 25%, respectively). Global and dimensional QoL mean scores variation rates showed a significant difference between groups, with an improvement in the intervention group (r ≥ 0.7, Cohen's > 0.8) and a decrease in the control group (r ≥ 0.7).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These results support the hypotheses of difference between the study groups in favor of better glycemic control and QoL for the intervention group.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15581,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Education and Health Promotion\",\"volume\":\"13 \",\"pages\":\"228\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11410240/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Education and Health Promotion\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/jehp.jehp_1258_23\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Education and Health Promotion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jehp.jehp_1258_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:1型糖尿病(T1DM)是最可怕的慢性疾病之一,尤其是在儿童或青少年中。为帮助患者及其家人有效控制病情,有组织的患者治疗教育(TPE)至关重要:这项前后对照的非随机研究旨在评估 TPE 项目的效果。共有 200 名 8-18 岁的 T1DM 儿童和青少年被选自两个儿科部门,他们被平均分配到干预组和对照组。主要终点是随访3个月时各组在HbA1c测量值和通过有效问卷评估的健康相关生活质量(QoL)方面的差异:在对 T1DM 儿童和青少年进行 TPE 干预的 3 个月随访中,虽然两组的 HbA1c 均无显著变化,但干预组的餐前和餐后血糖最高水平有显著改善(r:~0.3;变化率:分别为-10.47%和-3.85%),而对照组的餐前血糖最高水平和最低水平有显著增加(r:~0.3;变化率:分别为 14.29%和 25%)。总体和维度 QoL 平均分变异率显示组间存在显著差异,干预组有所改善(r ≥ 0.7,Cohen's > 0.8),对照组有所下降(r ≥ 0.7):这些结果支持研究组之间存在差异的假设,即干预组的血糖控制和 QoL 更好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Investigation of the therapeutic education effect on glycemic control and quality of life of children and adolescents with type-1 diabetes mellitus: A non-randomized controlled study.

Background: Type-1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) is one of the most dreaded chronic diseases, especially in children or youth. To help patients and their families effectively manage their disease, structured therapeutic patient education (TPE) is essential.

Materials and method: The purpose of this non-randomized before and after controlled study was to assess TPE program effects. In total, 200 T1DM children and adolescents, aged 8-18 years, selected from two pediatric departments, were equally assigned to the intervention and control groups. The primary endpoints were differences between groups at 3 months follow-up in measured HbA1c and health-related quality of life (QoL) assessed by a validated questionnaire.

Results: At 3 months follow-up of a TPE intervention for T1DM children and adolescents, although there was no significant change in HbA1c for both groups, a significant improvement was observed in the maximum pre- and postprandial blood glucose levels (r: ~0.3; variation rates: -10,47% and -3,85%, respectively) in the intervention group, whereas there was a significant increase in the maximum and minimum of preprandial blood glucose levels in the control group (r: ~0.3, variation rates: 14.29% and 25%, respectively). Global and dimensional QoL mean scores variation rates showed a significant difference between groups, with an improvement in the intervention group (r ≥ 0.7, Cohen's > 0.8) and a decrease in the control group (r ≥ 0.7).

Conclusion: These results support the hypotheses of difference between the study groups in favor of better glycemic control and QoL for the intervention group.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
21.40%
发文量
218
审稿时长
34 weeks
期刊最新文献
"The feedback dilemma"-provider and learner perspectives regarding the barriers and facilitators for giving and receiving feedback in medical education: A parallel mixed methods approach. Appraisal the structure of diabetes self-management education and support in diabetes education units of Isfahan, Iran. Assessing the relationship between dyslexia, psychological distress, and academic self-efficacy among Nigerian university undergraduates. Assessment of self-satisfaction, happiness, and quality of life (QoL) among adults: An online survey. Attitude of the health team to the infant home care plan during the COVID-19 pandemic: A cross-sectional study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1