阿贾大学附属军事医疗中心的医生对人工智能及其应用的了解和接受程度:一项横断面研究。

IF 1.4 Q3 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES Journal of Education and Health Promotion Pub Date : 2024-07-29 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.4103/jehp.jehp_898_23
Esfandiar Esfandiari, Fatemeh Kalroozi, Nahid Mehrabi, Yasaman Hosseini
{"title":"阿贾大学附属军事医疗中心的医生对人工智能及其应用的了解和接受程度:一项横断面研究。","authors":"Esfandiar Esfandiari, Fatemeh Kalroozi, Nahid Mehrabi, Yasaman Hosseini","doi":"10.4103/jehp.jehp_898_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The use of artificial intelligence (AI) in medical sciences promises many benefits. Applying the benefits of this science in developing countries is still in the development stage. This important point depends considerably on the knowledge and acceptance levels of physicians.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This study was a cross-sectional descriptive-analytical study that was conducted on 169 medical doctors using a purposive sampling method. To collect data, questionnaires were used to obtain demographic characteristics, a questionnaire to investigate the knowledge of AI and its applications, and an acceptability questionnaire to investigate AI. For data analysis, SPSS (Statistical Package for the Social Sciences) version 22 and appropriate descriptive and inferential statistical tests were used, and a significance level of < 0.05 was considered.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most of the participants (102) were male (60.4%), married (144) (85.20%), had specialized doctorate education (97) (57.4%), and had average work experience of 10.78 ± 6.67 years. The mean and standard deviation of knowledge about AI were 9.54 ± 3.04, and acceptability was 81.64 ± 13.83. Multiple linear regressions showed that work history (<i>P</i> = 0.017) and history of participation in AI training courses (<i>P</i> = 0.007) are effective in knowledge and acceptability of AI.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The knowledge and acceptability of the use of AI among the studied physicians were at an average level. However, due to the importance of using AI in medical sciences and the inevitable use of this technology in the near future, especially in medical sciences in crisis, war, and military conditions, it is necessary for the policymakers of the health system to improve the knowledge and methods of working with this technology in the medical staff in addition to providing the infrastructure.</p>","PeriodicalId":15581,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Education and Health Promotion","volume":"13 ","pages":"271"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11414869/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Knowledge and acceptance of artificial intelligence and its applications among the physicians working in military medical centers affiliated with Aja University: A cross-sectional study.\",\"authors\":\"Esfandiar Esfandiari, Fatemeh Kalroozi, Nahid Mehrabi, Yasaman Hosseini\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/jehp.jehp_898_23\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The use of artificial intelligence (AI) in medical sciences promises many benefits. Applying the benefits of this science in developing countries is still in the development stage. This important point depends considerably on the knowledge and acceptance levels of physicians.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This study was a cross-sectional descriptive-analytical study that was conducted on 169 medical doctors using a purposive sampling method. To collect data, questionnaires were used to obtain demographic characteristics, a questionnaire to investigate the knowledge of AI and its applications, and an acceptability questionnaire to investigate AI. For data analysis, SPSS (Statistical Package for the Social Sciences) version 22 and appropriate descriptive and inferential statistical tests were used, and a significance level of < 0.05 was considered.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most of the participants (102) were male (60.4%), married (144) (85.20%), had specialized doctorate education (97) (57.4%), and had average work experience of 10.78 ± 6.67 years. The mean and standard deviation of knowledge about AI were 9.54 ± 3.04, and acceptability was 81.64 ± 13.83. Multiple linear regressions showed that work history (<i>P</i> = 0.017) and history of participation in AI training courses (<i>P</i> = 0.007) are effective in knowledge and acceptability of AI.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The knowledge and acceptability of the use of AI among the studied physicians were at an average level. However, due to the importance of using AI in medical sciences and the inevitable use of this technology in the near future, especially in medical sciences in crisis, war, and military conditions, it is necessary for the policymakers of the health system to improve the knowledge and methods of working with this technology in the medical staff in addition to providing the infrastructure.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15581,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Education and Health Promotion\",\"volume\":\"13 \",\"pages\":\"271\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11414869/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Education and Health Promotion\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/jehp.jehp_898_23\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Education and Health Promotion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jehp.jehp_898_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:人工智能(AI)在医学科学中的应用前景广阔。在发展中国家应用这门科学的好处仍处于发展阶段。这一点在很大程度上取决于医生的知识水平和接受程度:本研究是一项横断面描述性分析研究,采用目的性抽样方法对 169 名医生进行了调查。在收集数据时,使用了调查问卷来获取人口统计学特征、调查问卷来调查人工智能及其应用的知识,以及调查问卷来调查人工智能的可接受性。数据分析使用了 SPSS(社会科学统计软件包)22 版,并进行了适当的描述性和推断性统计检验,显著性水平小于 0.05:大多数参与者(102 人)为男性(60.4%),已婚(144 人)(85.20%),具有专业博士学位(97 人)(57.4%),平均工作年限为 10.78±6.67 年。对人工智能的了解程度的平均值和标准差分别为(9.54 ± 3.04)和(81.64 ± 13.83)。多元线性回归结果显示,工作经历(P = 0.017)和参加人工智能培训课程的经历(P = 0.007)对人工智能知识的了解和接受程度有影响:结论:所研究的医生对使用人工智能的认知度和接受度处于平均水平。然而,由于在医学科学中使用人工智能的重要性,以及在不久的将来,尤其是在危机、战争和军事条件下的医学科学中使用该技术的必然性,卫生系统的决策者有必要在提供基础设施的同时,提高医务人员使用该技术的知识和方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Knowledge and acceptance of artificial intelligence and its applications among the physicians working in military medical centers affiliated with Aja University: A cross-sectional study.

Background: The use of artificial intelligence (AI) in medical sciences promises many benefits. Applying the benefits of this science in developing countries is still in the development stage. This important point depends considerably on the knowledge and acceptance levels of physicians.

Materials and methods: This study was a cross-sectional descriptive-analytical study that was conducted on 169 medical doctors using a purposive sampling method. To collect data, questionnaires were used to obtain demographic characteristics, a questionnaire to investigate the knowledge of AI and its applications, and an acceptability questionnaire to investigate AI. For data analysis, SPSS (Statistical Package for the Social Sciences) version 22 and appropriate descriptive and inferential statistical tests were used, and a significance level of < 0.05 was considered.

Results: Most of the participants (102) were male (60.4%), married (144) (85.20%), had specialized doctorate education (97) (57.4%), and had average work experience of 10.78 ± 6.67 years. The mean and standard deviation of knowledge about AI were 9.54 ± 3.04, and acceptability was 81.64 ± 13.83. Multiple linear regressions showed that work history (P = 0.017) and history of participation in AI training courses (P = 0.007) are effective in knowledge and acceptability of AI.

Conclusion: The knowledge and acceptability of the use of AI among the studied physicians were at an average level. However, due to the importance of using AI in medical sciences and the inevitable use of this technology in the near future, especially in medical sciences in crisis, war, and military conditions, it is necessary for the policymakers of the health system to improve the knowledge and methods of working with this technology in the medical staff in addition to providing the infrastructure.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
21.40%
发文量
218
审稿时长
34 weeks
期刊最新文献
"The feedback dilemma"-provider and learner perspectives regarding the barriers and facilitators for giving and receiving feedback in medical education: A parallel mixed methods approach. Appraisal the structure of diabetes self-management education and support in diabetes education units of Isfahan, Iran. Assessing the relationship between dyslexia, psychological distress, and academic self-efficacy among Nigerian university undergraduates. Assessment of self-satisfaction, happiness, and quality of life (QoL) among adults: An online survey. Attitude of the health team to the infant home care plan during the COVID-19 pandemic: A cross-sectional study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1