用于鱼类病原体检测和定量的液滴数字 PCR:系统综述和荟萃分析。

IF 2.2 3区 农林科学 Q2 FISHERIES Journal of fish diseases Pub Date : 2024-09-16 DOI:10.1111/jfd.14019
Md Afsar Ahmed Sumon, Edinson Dante Meregildo-Rodriguez, Po-Tsang Lee, Nguyen Dinh-Hung, Earl T. Larson, Patima Permpoonpattana, Hien Van Doan, Won-Kyo Jung, Nguyen Vu Linh
{"title":"用于鱼类病原体检测和定量的液滴数字 PCR:系统综述和荟萃分析。","authors":"Md Afsar Ahmed Sumon,&nbsp;Edinson Dante Meregildo-Rodriguez,&nbsp;Po-Tsang Lee,&nbsp;Nguyen Dinh-Hung,&nbsp;Earl T. Larson,&nbsp;Patima Permpoonpattana,&nbsp;Hien Van Doan,&nbsp;Won-Kyo Jung,&nbsp;Nguyen Vu Linh","doi":"10.1111/jfd.14019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study provides a comprehensive summary of the findings regarding the application and diagnostic efficacy of droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) in detecting viral and bacterial pathogens in aquaculture. Utilizing a systematic search of four databases up to 6 November 2023, we identified studies where ddPCR was deployed for pathogen detection in aquaculture settings, adhering to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis of Diagnostic Test Accuracy guidelines. From the collected data, 16 studies retrieved, seven were included in a meta-analysis, encompassing 1121 biological samples from various fish species. The detection limits reported ranged markedly from 0.07 to 34 copies/μL. A direct comparison of the diagnostic performance between ddPCR with quantitative PCR (qPCR) proved challenging due to limited data, thus only a pooled sensitivity analysis was feasible. The results showed a pooled sensitivity of 0.750 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.487–0.944) for ddPCR, compared to 0.461 (95% CI: 0.294–0.632) for qPCR, with no statistically significant difference in sensitivity between the two methods (<i>p</i> = .5884). Notably, significant heterogeneity was observed among the studies (<i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 93%–97%, <i>p</i> &lt; .01), with the year of publication significantly influencing this heterogeneity (<i>p</i> &lt; .001), but not the country of origin (<i>p</i> = .49). No publication bias was detected, and the studies generally exhibited a low risk of bias according to QUADAS-C criteria. While ddPCR and qPCR showed comparable sensitivities in pathogen detection, ddPCR's capability to precisely quantify pathogens without the need for standard curves highlights its potential utility. This characteristic could significantly enhance the accuracy and reliability of pathogen detection in aquaculture.</p>","PeriodicalId":15849,"journal":{"name":"Journal of fish diseases","volume":"47 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Droplet digital PCR for fish pathogen detection and quantification: A systematic review and meta-analysis\",\"authors\":\"Md Afsar Ahmed Sumon,&nbsp;Edinson Dante Meregildo-Rodriguez,&nbsp;Po-Tsang Lee,&nbsp;Nguyen Dinh-Hung,&nbsp;Earl T. Larson,&nbsp;Patima Permpoonpattana,&nbsp;Hien Van Doan,&nbsp;Won-Kyo Jung,&nbsp;Nguyen Vu Linh\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jfd.14019\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>This study provides a comprehensive summary of the findings regarding the application and diagnostic efficacy of droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) in detecting viral and bacterial pathogens in aquaculture. Utilizing a systematic search of four databases up to 6 November 2023, we identified studies where ddPCR was deployed for pathogen detection in aquaculture settings, adhering to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis of Diagnostic Test Accuracy guidelines. From the collected data, 16 studies retrieved, seven were included in a meta-analysis, encompassing 1121 biological samples from various fish species. The detection limits reported ranged markedly from 0.07 to 34 copies/μL. A direct comparison of the diagnostic performance between ddPCR with quantitative PCR (qPCR) proved challenging due to limited data, thus only a pooled sensitivity analysis was feasible. The results showed a pooled sensitivity of 0.750 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.487–0.944) for ddPCR, compared to 0.461 (95% CI: 0.294–0.632) for qPCR, with no statistically significant difference in sensitivity between the two methods (<i>p</i> = .5884). Notably, significant heterogeneity was observed among the studies (<i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 93%–97%, <i>p</i> &lt; .01), with the year of publication significantly influencing this heterogeneity (<i>p</i> &lt; .001), but not the country of origin (<i>p</i> = .49). No publication bias was detected, and the studies generally exhibited a low risk of bias according to QUADAS-C criteria. While ddPCR and qPCR showed comparable sensitivities in pathogen detection, ddPCR's capability to precisely quantify pathogens without the need for standard curves highlights its potential utility. This characteristic could significantly enhance the accuracy and reliability of pathogen detection in aquaculture.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15849,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of fish diseases\",\"volume\":\"47 12\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of fish diseases\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jfd.14019\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"FISHERIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of fish diseases","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jfd.14019","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FISHERIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究全面总结了有关液滴数字 PCR(ddPCR)在水产养殖中检测病毒和细菌病原体的应用和诊断效果的研究结果。通过对截至 2023 年 11 月 6 日的四个数据库进行系统检索,我们确定了在水产养殖环境中应用 ddPCR 检测病原体的研究,并遵循了诊断测试准确性系统综述和荟萃分析首选报告项目指南。从收集到的数据中,检索到 16 项研究,其中 7 项被纳入荟萃分析,涵盖来自不同鱼类物种的 1121 份生物样本。报告的检测限明显不同,从 0.07 到 34 个拷贝/微升不等。由于数据有限,直接比较 ddPCR 和定量 PCR (qPCR) 的诊断性能具有挑战性,因此只能进行集合灵敏度分析。结果显示,ddPCR 的集合灵敏度为 0.750(95% 置信区间 [CI]:0.487-0.944),而 qPCR 为 0.461(95% 置信区间 [CI]:0.294-0.632),两种方法的灵敏度差异无统计学意义(p = .5884)。值得注意的是,研究之间存在明显的异质性(I2 = 93%-97%,p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Droplet digital PCR for fish pathogen detection and quantification: A systematic review and meta-analysis

This study provides a comprehensive summary of the findings regarding the application and diagnostic efficacy of droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) in detecting viral and bacterial pathogens in aquaculture. Utilizing a systematic search of four databases up to 6 November 2023, we identified studies where ddPCR was deployed for pathogen detection in aquaculture settings, adhering to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis of Diagnostic Test Accuracy guidelines. From the collected data, 16 studies retrieved, seven were included in a meta-analysis, encompassing 1121 biological samples from various fish species. The detection limits reported ranged markedly from 0.07 to 34 copies/μL. A direct comparison of the diagnostic performance between ddPCR with quantitative PCR (qPCR) proved challenging due to limited data, thus only a pooled sensitivity analysis was feasible. The results showed a pooled sensitivity of 0.750 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.487–0.944) for ddPCR, compared to 0.461 (95% CI: 0.294–0.632) for qPCR, with no statistically significant difference in sensitivity between the two methods (p = .5884). Notably, significant heterogeneity was observed among the studies (I2 = 93%–97%, p < .01), with the year of publication significantly influencing this heterogeneity (p < .001), but not the country of origin (p = .49). No publication bias was detected, and the studies generally exhibited a low risk of bias according to QUADAS-C criteria. While ddPCR and qPCR showed comparable sensitivities in pathogen detection, ddPCR's capability to precisely quantify pathogens without the need for standard curves highlights its potential utility. This characteristic could significantly enhance the accuracy and reliability of pathogen detection in aquaculture.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of fish diseases
Journal of fish diseases 农林科学-海洋与淡水生物学
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
12.00%
发文量
170
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Fish Diseases enjoys an international reputation as the medium for the exchange of information on original research into all aspects of disease in both wild and cultured fish and shellfish. Areas of interest regularly covered by the journal include: -host-pathogen relationships- studies of fish pathogens- pathophysiology- diagnostic methods- therapy- epidemiology- descriptions of new diseases
期刊最新文献
Follicular Cell Hyperplasia (Goitre), Adenoma and Adenocarcinoma of the Thyroid Gland in Fourlined Terapon (Pelates quadrilineatus): Clinical and Histopathological Study: 2022-2023. Monitoring Fish Bacterial Pathogens of Wild Fish Species From the South China Sea by Applying Next-Generation Sequencing on Gill Tissue. Temperature-Related Effects on Disease Susceptibility and Immune Response in Redband Trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss gairdneri) Following Challenge With Flavobacterium columnare. Development of Three Recombinase Polymerase Amplification Assays for the Rapid Visual Detection of Spiroplasma eriocheiris. Does the Infestation by Trematode Parasites Influence Trade-Offs Between Somatic Condition and Male Reproductive Traits in a Viviparous Fish?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1