术后外科医生电话是否能改善下颌骨骨折修复术后的效果?

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-03 DOI:10.1016/j.joms.2024.08.066
Mari-Alina Timoshchuk, Andrew G Chapple, Brian J Christensen
{"title":"术后外科医生电话是否能改善下颌骨骨折修复术后的效果?","authors":"Mari-Alina Timoshchuk, Andrew G Chapple, Brian J Christensen","doi":"10.1016/j.joms.2024.08.066","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Complications of open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of mandibular fractures are influenced by several patient factors. A postoperative surgeon phone call could modify these factors through education and reinforcement of instructions, but its effect has not been studied.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of this study was to measure and compare the frequencies of postoperative inflammatory complications (POICs) following ORIF of mandibular fractures in patients who did and did not receive a postoperative surgeon phone call.</p><p><strong>Study design, setting, sample: </strong>The authors conducted an ambispective cohort study consisting of patients with mandibular fractures treated with ORIF at a large urban trauma hospital with the prospective cohort from January 1, 2021 to March 31, 2022 and a retrospective cohort from April 1, 2020 to December 31, 2020. Prisoners and patients with gunshot wounds were excluded.</p><p><strong>Predictor variable: </strong>The primary predictor variable was the surgeon call group. After January 2021, a postoperative call was implemented 1-3 days following fracture repair to review instructions, such as nonchew diet and oral hygiene, and provide education, such as reviewing expectations. Prior to January 2021, patients were not called. This resulted in 3 categories: Not Called, Called and Answered, and No Answer.</p><p><strong>Main outcome variables: </strong>The primary outcome variable was POICs, defined as the occurrence of exposed or infected hardware, abscess formation, recurrent swelling/pain, nonunion, osteomyelitis, or fistula formation.</p><p><strong>Covariates: </strong>Demographic variables, injury-related variables, and treatment-related variables were also measured.</p><p><strong>Analyses: </strong>Statistical analysis was performed using Fisher's exact and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests, as well as multivariable logistic regression. A P value was considered significant if < .05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 178 patients in the study, 137 (77%) were male and the average age was 39.9 ± 12.6 years. Sixty-five patients (36.5%) were not called. Of the patients called, 79 (44.4%) answered and 34 (19.1%) did not answer. POICs occurred in 9.2% of the Not Called group and 8.9% of the Called and Answered group (P = .99). In the No Answer group, 29.4% had POICs, which was higher than the other 2 groups (P = .01).</p><p><strong>Conclusion and relevance: </strong>A surgeon phone call was not associated with complication rates; however, patients in the No Answer group were significantly more likely to experience a POIC.</p>","PeriodicalId":16612,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"37-45"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Do Postoperative Surgeon Phone Calls Improve Outcomes Following Mandibular Fracture Repair?\",\"authors\":\"Mari-Alina Timoshchuk, Andrew G Chapple, Brian J Christensen\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.joms.2024.08.066\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Complications of open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of mandibular fractures are influenced by several patient factors. A postoperative surgeon phone call could modify these factors through education and reinforcement of instructions, but its effect has not been studied.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of this study was to measure and compare the frequencies of postoperative inflammatory complications (POICs) following ORIF of mandibular fractures in patients who did and did not receive a postoperative surgeon phone call.</p><p><strong>Study design, setting, sample: </strong>The authors conducted an ambispective cohort study consisting of patients with mandibular fractures treated with ORIF at a large urban trauma hospital with the prospective cohort from January 1, 2021 to March 31, 2022 and a retrospective cohort from April 1, 2020 to December 31, 2020. Prisoners and patients with gunshot wounds were excluded.</p><p><strong>Predictor variable: </strong>The primary predictor variable was the surgeon call group. After January 2021, a postoperative call was implemented 1-3 days following fracture repair to review instructions, such as nonchew diet and oral hygiene, and provide education, such as reviewing expectations. Prior to January 2021, patients were not called. This resulted in 3 categories: Not Called, Called and Answered, and No Answer.</p><p><strong>Main outcome variables: </strong>The primary outcome variable was POICs, defined as the occurrence of exposed or infected hardware, abscess formation, recurrent swelling/pain, nonunion, osteomyelitis, or fistula formation.</p><p><strong>Covariates: </strong>Demographic variables, injury-related variables, and treatment-related variables were also measured.</p><p><strong>Analyses: </strong>Statistical analysis was performed using Fisher's exact and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests, as well as multivariable logistic regression. A P value was considered significant if < .05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 178 patients in the study, 137 (77%) were male and the average age was 39.9 ± 12.6 years. Sixty-five patients (36.5%) were not called. Of the patients called, 79 (44.4%) answered and 34 (19.1%) did not answer. POICs occurred in 9.2% of the Not Called group and 8.9% of the Called and Answered group (P = .99). In the No Answer group, 29.4% had POICs, which was higher than the other 2 groups (P = .01).</p><p><strong>Conclusion and relevance: </strong>A surgeon phone call was not associated with complication rates; however, patients in the No Answer group were significantly more likely to experience a POIC.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16612,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"37-45\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2024.08.066\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/9/3 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2024.08.066","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:下颌骨骨折切开复位内固定术(ORIF)的并发症受多种患者因素的影响。目的:本研究旨在测量和比较下颌骨骨折开放复位内固定术(ORIF)后,接受和未接受术后外科医生电话指导的患者术后炎症并发症(POIC)的发生频率:作者开展了一项前瞻性队列研究,研究对象包括在一家大型城市创伤医院接受 ORIF 治疗的下颌骨骨折患者,前瞻性队列研究的时间为 2021 年 1 月 1 日至 2022 年 3 月 31 日,回顾性队列研究的时间为 2020 年 4 月 1 日至 2020 年 12 月 31 日。不包括囚犯和枪伤患者:主要预测变量是外科医生呼叫组。2021 年 1 月后,在骨折修复后 1-3 天实施术后呼叫,以复查指导,如非咀嚼饮食和口腔卫生,并提供教育,如复查期望值。而在 2021 年 1 月之前,则不给患者打电话。这导致了 3 个类别:主要结果变量:主要结果变量为 POICs,定义为发生硬件外露或感染、脓肿形成、反复肿胀/疼痛、不愈合、骨髓炎或瘘管形成:还测量了人口统计学变量、损伤相关变量和治疗相关变量:采用费雪精确检验、Wilcoxon 秩和检验以及多变量逻辑回归进行统计分析。结果:在 178 名患者中,P 值为显著:在研究的 178 名患者中,137 名(77%)为男性,平均年龄为 39.9 ± 12.6 岁。65名患者(36.5%)未接到电话。在被呼叫的患者中,79 人(44.4%)接听了电话,34 人(19.1%)没有接听。未呼叫组中有 9.2% 的患者发生了 POIC,呼叫并应答组中有 8.9% 的患者发生了 POIC(P = 0.99)。在未接听组中,29.4%发生了POIC,高于其他两组(P = .01):外科医生电话与并发症发生率无关;但是,无应答组患者发生 POIC 的可能性明显更高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Do Postoperative Surgeon Phone Calls Improve Outcomes Following Mandibular Fracture Repair?

Background: Complications of open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of mandibular fractures are influenced by several patient factors. A postoperative surgeon phone call could modify these factors through education and reinforcement of instructions, but its effect has not been studied.

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to measure and compare the frequencies of postoperative inflammatory complications (POICs) following ORIF of mandibular fractures in patients who did and did not receive a postoperative surgeon phone call.

Study design, setting, sample: The authors conducted an ambispective cohort study consisting of patients with mandibular fractures treated with ORIF at a large urban trauma hospital with the prospective cohort from January 1, 2021 to March 31, 2022 and a retrospective cohort from April 1, 2020 to December 31, 2020. Prisoners and patients with gunshot wounds were excluded.

Predictor variable: The primary predictor variable was the surgeon call group. After January 2021, a postoperative call was implemented 1-3 days following fracture repair to review instructions, such as nonchew diet and oral hygiene, and provide education, such as reviewing expectations. Prior to January 2021, patients were not called. This resulted in 3 categories: Not Called, Called and Answered, and No Answer.

Main outcome variables: The primary outcome variable was POICs, defined as the occurrence of exposed or infected hardware, abscess formation, recurrent swelling/pain, nonunion, osteomyelitis, or fistula formation.

Covariates: Demographic variables, injury-related variables, and treatment-related variables were also measured.

Analyses: Statistical analysis was performed using Fisher's exact and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests, as well as multivariable logistic regression. A P value was considered significant if < .05.

Results: Of the 178 patients in the study, 137 (77%) were male and the average age was 39.9 ± 12.6 years. Sixty-five patients (36.5%) were not called. Of the patients called, 79 (44.4%) answered and 34 (19.1%) did not answer. POICs occurred in 9.2% of the Not Called group and 8.9% of the Called and Answered group (P = .99). In the No Answer group, 29.4% had POICs, which was higher than the other 2 groups (P = .01).

Conclusion and relevance: A surgeon phone call was not associated with complication rates; however, patients in the No Answer group were significantly more likely to experience a POIC.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
5.30%
发文量
0
审稿时长
41 days
期刊介绍: This monthly journal offers comprehensive coverage of new techniques, important developments and innovative ideas in oral and maxillofacial surgery. Practice-applicable articles help develop the methods used to handle dentoalveolar surgery, facial injuries and deformities, TMJ disorders, oral cancer, jaw reconstruction, anesthesia and analgesia. The journal also includes specifics on new instruments and diagnostic equipment and modern therapeutic drugs and devices. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery is recommended for first or priority subscription by the Dental Section of the Medical Library Association.
期刊最新文献
Does Varying Platelet-Rich Fibrin Centri̇fugati̇on Protocols Enhance New Bone Formati̇on in Extracti̇on Site? Fluorescence Visualization-Guided Surgery Improves Local Control for Mandibular Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Do Postoperative Surgeon Phone Calls Improve Outcomes Following Mandibular Fracture Repair? Geographic Trends in the Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Residency Match. What is the Minimal Perceptible Change for the Dimensional Alteration of Facial Structures in the Frontal View?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1