Pradeep Kumar Velumula MD, Praveen Kumar Boddu MD, Mirjana Lulic-Botica PharmD, Luna Khanal MD, Joe Amoah MD, Monika Bajaj MD
{"title":"与 Intralipid 相比,SMOF 脂质与极低出生体重儿肠外营养相关胆汁淤积症之间存在关联:一项回顾性队列研究。","authors":"Pradeep Kumar Velumula MD, Praveen Kumar Boddu MD, Mirjana Lulic-Botica PharmD, Luna Khanal MD, Joe Amoah MD, Monika Bajaj MD","doi":"10.1002/jpen.2689","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>There is limited evidence on benefits of SMOF lipids (mixed fatty acid emulsion of 30% soybean oil, 30% medium chain triglycerides, 25% olive oil, and 15% fish oil) in reducing parenteral nutrition–associated cholestasis in extremely low birth weight infants, compared with soybean oil–based Intralipid.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aim</h3>\n \n <p>To compare incidence of parenteral nutrition–associated cholestasis in preterm infants who received Intralipid vs SMOF lipid.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We conducted a retrospective study on infants with birth weight <1000 g, admitted between January 2013 to December 2022, who received parenteral nutrition for >14 days and divided them into two groups based on lipid emulsion received (Intralipid, <i>n</i> = 187, SMOF, <i>n</i> = 127). Primary outcome was incidence of parenteral nutrition–associated cholestasis, defined as direct bilirubin ≥2 mg/dl.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Baseline characteristics did not differ between the two groups. No significant difference was noted in parenteral nutrition–associated cholestasis between the two groups on logistic regression, (adjusted odds ratio: 0.71, 95% confidence interval 0.35–1.42, <i>P</i> value 0.33) after adjusting for gestational age, parenteral nutrition days, lipid days, and late-onset sepsis.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>There was no difference in the rates of parenteral nutrition–associated cholestasis between preterm infants administered SMOF lipids and those given Intralipid.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":16668,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition","volume":"48 8","pages":"949-955"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Association between SMOF lipid and parenteral nutrition–associated cholestasis compared with Intralipid in extremely low birth weight infants: A retrospective cohort study\",\"authors\":\"Pradeep Kumar Velumula MD, Praveen Kumar Boddu MD, Mirjana Lulic-Botica PharmD, Luna Khanal MD, Joe Amoah MD, Monika Bajaj MD\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jpen.2689\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>There is limited evidence on benefits of SMOF lipids (mixed fatty acid emulsion of 30% soybean oil, 30% medium chain triglycerides, 25% olive oil, and 15% fish oil) in reducing parenteral nutrition–associated cholestasis in extremely low birth weight infants, compared with soybean oil–based Intralipid.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Aim</h3>\\n \\n <p>To compare incidence of parenteral nutrition–associated cholestasis in preterm infants who received Intralipid vs SMOF lipid.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>We conducted a retrospective study on infants with birth weight <1000 g, admitted between January 2013 to December 2022, who received parenteral nutrition for >14 days and divided them into two groups based on lipid emulsion received (Intralipid, <i>n</i> = 187, SMOF, <i>n</i> = 127). Primary outcome was incidence of parenteral nutrition–associated cholestasis, defined as direct bilirubin ≥2 mg/dl.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Baseline characteristics did not differ between the two groups. No significant difference was noted in parenteral nutrition–associated cholestasis between the two groups on logistic regression, (adjusted odds ratio: 0.71, 95% confidence interval 0.35–1.42, <i>P</i> value 0.33) after adjusting for gestational age, parenteral nutrition days, lipid days, and late-onset sepsis.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>There was no difference in the rates of parenteral nutrition–associated cholestasis between preterm infants administered SMOF lipids and those given Intralipid.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16668,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition\",\"volume\":\"48 8\",\"pages\":\"949-955\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jpen.2689\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NUTRITION & DIETETICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jpen.2689","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Association between SMOF lipid and parenteral nutrition–associated cholestasis compared with Intralipid in extremely low birth weight infants: A retrospective cohort study
Background
There is limited evidence on benefits of SMOF lipids (mixed fatty acid emulsion of 30% soybean oil, 30% medium chain triglycerides, 25% olive oil, and 15% fish oil) in reducing parenteral nutrition–associated cholestasis in extremely low birth weight infants, compared with soybean oil–based Intralipid.
Aim
To compare incidence of parenteral nutrition–associated cholestasis in preterm infants who received Intralipid vs SMOF lipid.
Methods
We conducted a retrospective study on infants with birth weight <1000 g, admitted between January 2013 to December 2022, who received parenteral nutrition for >14 days and divided them into two groups based on lipid emulsion received (Intralipid, n = 187, SMOF, n = 127). Primary outcome was incidence of parenteral nutrition–associated cholestasis, defined as direct bilirubin ≥2 mg/dl.
Results
Baseline characteristics did not differ between the two groups. No significant difference was noted in parenteral nutrition–associated cholestasis between the two groups on logistic regression, (adjusted odds ratio: 0.71, 95% confidence interval 0.35–1.42, P value 0.33) after adjusting for gestational age, parenteral nutrition days, lipid days, and late-onset sepsis.
Conclusion
There was no difference in the rates of parenteral nutrition–associated cholestasis between preterm infants administered SMOF lipids and those given Intralipid.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (JPEN) is the premier scientific journal of nutrition and metabolic support. It publishes original peer-reviewed studies that define the cutting edge of basic and clinical research in the field. It explores the science of optimizing the care of patients receiving enteral or IV therapies. Also included: reviews, techniques, brief reports, case reports, and abstracts.