体外阳极氧化对钛基台表面粗糙度和细菌附着力的影响。

IF 4.3 2区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry Pub Date : 2024-09-13 DOI:10.1016/j.prosdent.2024.08.004
Shaghayegh Golalipour, Ezatollah Jalalian, Sara Koosha, Sotude Khorshidi, Maryam Torshabi, Maryam Sayyari
{"title":"体外阳极氧化对钛基台表面粗糙度和细菌附着力的影响。","authors":"Shaghayegh Golalipour, Ezatollah Jalalian, Sara Koosha, Sotude Khorshidi, Maryam Torshabi, Maryam Sayyari","doi":"10.1016/j.prosdent.2024.08.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Statement of problem: </strong>Titanium abutments are considered the criterion standard for dental implants, yet the gray color poses esthetic concerns. Anodization has been proposed to enhance esthetics, but its effects on surface roughness and bacterial adhesion are unclear.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of this in vitro study was to assess the effect of anodization on surface roughness and bacterial adhesion to titanium abutments.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Sixteen titanium abutments were divided into test (anodized) and control (nonanodized) groups (n=8). Anodization used 63 V from seven 9 V batteries and an electrolyte of 250 mL distilled water with 1 g trisodium phosphate. Surface roughness was measured with a profilometer at 4 mN force and 0.5 mm/second, assessing 3 supragingival points per specimen. In addition, 1 specimen from each group was selected for field-emission scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM). Sterilized abutments were exposed to a Staphylococcus aureus suspension (10<sup>5</sup> CFUs/mL) and then placed in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), sonicated, vortexed, diluted, and cultured on agar. Bacterial adhesion was assessed after incubating 144 microplates at 37 °C for 24 hours. Colony counts were calculated using a dilution factor and serial dilution, and log 10 of CFUs/mL plotted. Data analysis used the Student t test for bacterial adhesion and the Mann-Whitney U test for surface roughness (α=.05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The test and control groups showed no significant difference in surface roughness (P>.05). However, bacterial adhesion to anodized abutments was significantly lower than that to control abutments (P<.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Anodization of titanium abutments significantly decreased bacterial adhesion and had no significant effect on surface roughness.</p>","PeriodicalId":16866,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"In vitro effect of anodization on surface roughness and bacterial adhesion to titanium abutments.\",\"authors\":\"Shaghayegh Golalipour, Ezatollah Jalalian, Sara Koosha, Sotude Khorshidi, Maryam Torshabi, Maryam Sayyari\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.prosdent.2024.08.004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Statement of problem: </strong>Titanium abutments are considered the criterion standard for dental implants, yet the gray color poses esthetic concerns. Anodization has been proposed to enhance esthetics, but its effects on surface roughness and bacterial adhesion are unclear.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of this in vitro study was to assess the effect of anodization on surface roughness and bacterial adhesion to titanium abutments.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Sixteen titanium abutments were divided into test (anodized) and control (nonanodized) groups (n=8). Anodization used 63 V from seven 9 V batteries and an electrolyte of 250 mL distilled water with 1 g trisodium phosphate. Surface roughness was measured with a profilometer at 4 mN force and 0.5 mm/second, assessing 3 supragingival points per specimen. In addition, 1 specimen from each group was selected for field-emission scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM). Sterilized abutments were exposed to a Staphylococcus aureus suspension (10<sup>5</sup> CFUs/mL) and then placed in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), sonicated, vortexed, diluted, and cultured on agar. Bacterial adhesion was assessed after incubating 144 microplates at 37 °C for 24 hours. Colony counts were calculated using a dilution factor and serial dilution, and log 10 of CFUs/mL plotted. Data analysis used the Student t test for bacterial adhesion and the Mann-Whitney U test for surface roughness (α=.05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The test and control groups showed no significant difference in surface roughness (P>.05). However, bacterial adhesion to anodized abutments was significantly lower than that to control abutments (P<.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Anodization of titanium abutments significantly decreased bacterial adhesion and had no significant effect on surface roughness.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16866,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2024.08.004\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2024.08.004","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

问题陈述:钛基台被认为是牙科植入物的标准,但其灰色会影响美观。目的:本体外研究的目的是评估阳极氧化处理对钛基台表面粗糙度和细菌附着力的影响:16个钛基台被分为试验组(阳极氧化)和对照组(非阳极氧化)(n=8)。阳极氧化使用 7 节 9 V 电池的 63 V 电压和 250 mL 蒸馏水加 1 g 磷酸三钠的电解液。使用轮廓仪以 4 毫牛顿的力和 0.5 毫米/秒的速度测量表面粗糙度,每个试样评估 3 个龈上点。此外,还从每组中选择一个试样进行场发射扫描电子显微镜(FE-SEM)检查。消毒后的基台接触金黄色葡萄球菌悬浮液(105 CFUs/mL),然后放入磷酸盐缓冲盐水(PBS)中,超声、涡旋、稀释并在琼脂上培养。将 144 个微孔板在 37 °C 下培养 24 小时后,对细菌粘附性进行评估。使用稀释因子和连续稀释法计算菌落计数,并绘制 CFUs/mL 的对数 10。数据分析中,细菌粘附采用学生 t 检验,表面粗糙度采用 Mann-Whitney U 检验(α=.05):结果:试验组和对照组的表面粗糙度无明显差异(P>.05)。然而,细菌在阳极氧化基台上的附着力明显低于对照组(PC结论:对钛基台进行阳极氧化处理可明显减少细菌附着,对表面粗糙度无明显影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
In vitro effect of anodization on surface roughness and bacterial adhesion to titanium abutments.

Statement of problem: Titanium abutments are considered the criterion standard for dental implants, yet the gray color poses esthetic concerns. Anodization has been proposed to enhance esthetics, but its effects on surface roughness and bacterial adhesion are unclear.

Purpose: The purpose of this in vitro study was to assess the effect of anodization on surface roughness and bacterial adhesion to titanium abutments.

Material and methods: Sixteen titanium abutments were divided into test (anodized) and control (nonanodized) groups (n=8). Anodization used 63 V from seven 9 V batteries and an electrolyte of 250 mL distilled water with 1 g trisodium phosphate. Surface roughness was measured with a profilometer at 4 mN force and 0.5 mm/second, assessing 3 supragingival points per specimen. In addition, 1 specimen from each group was selected for field-emission scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM). Sterilized abutments were exposed to a Staphylococcus aureus suspension (105 CFUs/mL) and then placed in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), sonicated, vortexed, diluted, and cultured on agar. Bacterial adhesion was assessed after incubating 144 microplates at 37 °C for 24 hours. Colony counts were calculated using a dilution factor and serial dilution, and log 10 of CFUs/mL plotted. Data analysis used the Student t test for bacterial adhesion and the Mann-Whitney U test for surface roughness (α=.05).

Results: The test and control groups showed no significant difference in surface roughness (P>.05). However, bacterial adhesion to anodized abutments was significantly lower than that to control abutments (P<.001).

Conclusions: Anodization of titanium abutments significantly decreased bacterial adhesion and had no significant effect on surface roughness.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
13.00%
发文量
599
审稿时长
69 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry is the leading professional journal devoted exclusively to prosthetic and restorative dentistry. The Journal is the official publication for 24 leading U.S. international prosthodontic organizations. The monthly publication features timely, original peer-reviewed articles on the newest techniques, dental materials, and research findings. The Journal serves prosthodontists and dentists in advanced practice, and features color photos that illustrate many step-by-step procedures. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry is included in Index Medicus and CINAHL.
期刊最新文献
Effect of machining method and margin design on the accuracy and margin quality of monolithic zirconia crowns. A digital workflow for recording implant positions and jaw relation for implant-supported complete arch prostheses. Annual review of selected scientific literature: A report of the Committee on Scientific Investigation of the American Academy of Restorative Dentistry. Prosthodontic rehabilitation of a patient after mucormycosis using a digitally fabricated hollow complete denture with 3D printed intramucosal inserts. Unconventional digital dentures: Overcoming software challenges and integrating digital workflows into conventional techniques.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1