伽玛刀放射外科治疗散发性前庭裂隙瘤后肿瘤演变的动力学:确定个体轨迹的体积模式。

IF 16.4 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Neuro-oncology Pub Date : 2024-09-16 DOI:10.1093/neuonc/noae187
Anne Balossier, Madalina Olteanu, Christine Delsanti, Lucas Troude, Jean-Marc Thomassin, Pierre-Hugues Roche, Marie Chavent, Jean Régis
{"title":"伽玛刀放射外科治疗散发性前庭裂隙瘤后肿瘤演变的动力学:确定个体轨迹的体积模式。","authors":"Anne Balossier, Madalina Olteanu, Christine Delsanti, Lucas Troude, Jean-Marc Thomassin, Pierre-Hugues Roche, Marie Chavent, Jean Régis","doi":"10.1093/neuonc/noae187","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Definition of tumor control and treatment failure after Gammaknife radiosurgery (GKRS) for vestibular schwannoma (VS) is still debated. The lack of knowledge on the dynamics of tumor evolution can lead to misinterpretation and subsequent inappropriate second treatment. The aim of this study was to evaluate the post-GKRS dynamics of evolution of tumor volume, and characterize volumetric patterns.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We included patients with sporadic VS treated by GKRS with an MRI follow-up of minimum 3 years. A clustering in 2 steps was performed: definition of the patterns of evolution based on a subset of patients with the most comprehensive follow-up, then assignment of the remaining patients on a best fit basis. The minimum length of follow-up was assessed by measuring the consistency of the clusters over time (Adjusted Rand Index and Normalized Mutual Information). An analysis of the discriminant variables was finally performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>1,607 patients were included (median follow-up: 67 months). Five patterns were defined with one pattern gathering almost all cases of treatment failure. The clustering at 5 years afforded the highest consistency with long-term follow-up. Discriminant variables for clusters were: sex, initial symptoms, delay of diagnosis, Koos grading, fundus invasion, and number of isocenters.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The definition of these robust distinct patterns is likely to help tremendously the physicians to distinguish tumor control from potential failure. We advocate for no retreatment decision before 5 years post-GKRS. Further investigations are required to decide if the dynamics of evolution can be predicted at GKRS on an individual basis.</p>","PeriodicalId":19377,"journal":{"name":"Neuro-oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dynamics of tumor evolution after Gammaknife radiosurgery for sporadic vestibular schwannoma: defining volumetric patterns characterizing individual trajectory.\",\"authors\":\"Anne Balossier, Madalina Olteanu, Christine Delsanti, Lucas Troude, Jean-Marc Thomassin, Pierre-Hugues Roche, Marie Chavent, Jean Régis\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/neuonc/noae187\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Definition of tumor control and treatment failure after Gammaknife radiosurgery (GKRS) for vestibular schwannoma (VS) is still debated. The lack of knowledge on the dynamics of tumor evolution can lead to misinterpretation and subsequent inappropriate second treatment. The aim of this study was to evaluate the post-GKRS dynamics of evolution of tumor volume, and characterize volumetric patterns.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We included patients with sporadic VS treated by GKRS with an MRI follow-up of minimum 3 years. A clustering in 2 steps was performed: definition of the patterns of evolution based on a subset of patients with the most comprehensive follow-up, then assignment of the remaining patients on a best fit basis. The minimum length of follow-up was assessed by measuring the consistency of the clusters over time (Adjusted Rand Index and Normalized Mutual Information). An analysis of the discriminant variables was finally performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>1,607 patients were included (median follow-up: 67 months). Five patterns were defined with one pattern gathering almost all cases of treatment failure. The clustering at 5 years afforded the highest consistency with long-term follow-up. Discriminant variables for clusters were: sex, initial symptoms, delay of diagnosis, Koos grading, fundus invasion, and number of isocenters.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The definition of these robust distinct patterns is likely to help tremendously the physicians to distinguish tumor control from potential failure. We advocate for no retreatment decision before 5 years post-GKRS. Further investigations are required to decide if the dynamics of evolution can be predicted at GKRS on an individual basis.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19377,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neuro-oncology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":16.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neuro-oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/noae187\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuro-oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/noae187","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:前庭分裂瘤(VS)伽玛刀放射外科手术(GKRS)后肿瘤控制和治疗失败的定义仍存在争议。由于缺乏对肿瘤演变动态的了解,可能会导致误解和不恰当的二次治疗。本研究旨在评估 GKRS 术后肿瘤体积的动态演变,并描述肿瘤体积模式:我们纳入了接受 GKRS 治疗、磁共振成像随访至少 3 年的散发性 VS 患者。我们分两步进行了聚类:根据随访最全面的患者子集定义演变模式,然后根据最佳拟合原则分配其余患者。通过测量聚类随时间变化的一致性(调整后的兰德指数和归一化互信息)来评估随访的最短时间。最后进行了判别变量分析:共纳入 1,607 名患者(中位随访时间:67 个月)。共确定了五种模式,其中一种模式聚集了几乎所有的治疗失败病例。5 年的分组与长期随访的一致性最高。聚类的判别变量包括:性别、初始症状、诊断延迟、Koos分级、眼底侵犯和等中心数量:这些强大的独特模式的定义可能会极大地帮助医生区分肿瘤控制和潜在的失败。我们主张在 GKRS 术后 5 年前不做再治疗决定。我们还需要进一步的研究,以确定是否可以根据个体情况预测 GKRS 的演变动态。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Dynamics of tumor evolution after Gammaknife radiosurgery for sporadic vestibular schwannoma: defining volumetric patterns characterizing individual trajectory.

Background: Definition of tumor control and treatment failure after Gammaknife radiosurgery (GKRS) for vestibular schwannoma (VS) is still debated. The lack of knowledge on the dynamics of tumor evolution can lead to misinterpretation and subsequent inappropriate second treatment. The aim of this study was to evaluate the post-GKRS dynamics of evolution of tumor volume, and characterize volumetric patterns.

Methods: We included patients with sporadic VS treated by GKRS with an MRI follow-up of minimum 3 years. A clustering in 2 steps was performed: definition of the patterns of evolution based on a subset of patients with the most comprehensive follow-up, then assignment of the remaining patients on a best fit basis. The minimum length of follow-up was assessed by measuring the consistency of the clusters over time (Adjusted Rand Index and Normalized Mutual Information). An analysis of the discriminant variables was finally performed.

Results: 1,607 patients were included (median follow-up: 67 months). Five patterns were defined with one pattern gathering almost all cases of treatment failure. The clustering at 5 years afforded the highest consistency with long-term follow-up. Discriminant variables for clusters were: sex, initial symptoms, delay of diagnosis, Koos grading, fundus invasion, and number of isocenters.

Conclusions: The definition of these robust distinct patterns is likely to help tremendously the physicians to distinguish tumor control from potential failure. We advocate for no retreatment decision before 5 years post-GKRS. Further investigations are required to decide if the dynamics of evolution can be predicted at GKRS on an individual basis.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Neuro-oncology
Neuro-oncology 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
27.20
自引率
6.30%
发文量
1434
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Neuro-Oncology, the official journal of the Society for Neuro-Oncology, has been published monthly since January 2010. Affiliated with the Japan Society for Neuro-Oncology and the European Association of Neuro-Oncology, it is a global leader in the field. The journal is committed to swiftly disseminating high-quality information across all areas of neuro-oncology. It features peer-reviewed articles, reviews, symposia on various topics, abstracts from annual meetings, and updates from neuro-oncology societies worldwide.
期刊最新文献
Consensus recommendations for an integrated diagnostic approach to peripheral nerve sheath tumors arising in the setting of Neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1). Validation and next-generation update of a DNA methylation-based recurrence predictor for meningioma: a multicenter prospective study. Potential of ex vivo organotypic slice cultures in neuro-oncology. Raman-based machine-learning platform reveals unique metabolic differences between IDHmut and IDHwt glioma. Disturbance in cerebral blood microcirculation and hypoxic-ischemic microenvironment are associated with the development of brain metastasis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1