Anne Balossier, Madalina Olteanu, Christine Delsanti, Lucas Troude, Jean-Marc Thomassin, Pierre-Hugues Roche, Marie Chavent, Jean Régis
{"title":"伽玛刀放射外科治疗散发性前庭裂隙瘤后肿瘤演变的动力学:确定个体轨迹的体积模式。","authors":"Anne Balossier, Madalina Olteanu, Christine Delsanti, Lucas Troude, Jean-Marc Thomassin, Pierre-Hugues Roche, Marie Chavent, Jean Régis","doi":"10.1093/neuonc/noae187","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Definition of tumor control and treatment failure after Gammaknife radiosurgery (GKRS) for vestibular schwannoma (VS) is still debated. The lack of knowledge on the dynamics of tumor evolution can lead to misinterpretation and subsequent inappropriate second treatment. The aim of this study was to evaluate the post-GKRS dynamics of evolution of tumor volume, and characterize volumetric patterns.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We included patients with sporadic VS treated by GKRS with an MRI follow-up of minimum 3 years. A clustering in 2 steps was performed: definition of the patterns of evolution based on a subset of patients with the most comprehensive follow-up, then assignment of the remaining patients on a best fit basis. The minimum length of follow-up was assessed by measuring the consistency of the clusters over time (Adjusted Rand Index and Normalized Mutual Information). An analysis of the discriminant variables was finally performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>1,607 patients were included (median follow-up: 67 months). Five patterns were defined with one pattern gathering almost all cases of treatment failure. The clustering at 5 years afforded the highest consistency with long-term follow-up. Discriminant variables for clusters were: sex, initial symptoms, delay of diagnosis, Koos grading, fundus invasion, and number of isocenters.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The definition of these robust distinct patterns is likely to help tremendously the physicians to distinguish tumor control from potential failure. We advocate for no retreatment decision before 5 years post-GKRS. Further investigations are required to decide if the dynamics of evolution can be predicted at GKRS on an individual basis.</p>","PeriodicalId":19377,"journal":{"name":"Neuro-oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dynamics of tumor evolution after Gammaknife radiosurgery for sporadic vestibular schwannoma: defining volumetric patterns characterizing individual trajectory.\",\"authors\":\"Anne Balossier, Madalina Olteanu, Christine Delsanti, Lucas Troude, Jean-Marc Thomassin, Pierre-Hugues Roche, Marie Chavent, Jean Régis\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/neuonc/noae187\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Definition of tumor control and treatment failure after Gammaknife radiosurgery (GKRS) for vestibular schwannoma (VS) is still debated. The lack of knowledge on the dynamics of tumor evolution can lead to misinterpretation and subsequent inappropriate second treatment. The aim of this study was to evaluate the post-GKRS dynamics of evolution of tumor volume, and characterize volumetric patterns.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We included patients with sporadic VS treated by GKRS with an MRI follow-up of minimum 3 years. A clustering in 2 steps was performed: definition of the patterns of evolution based on a subset of patients with the most comprehensive follow-up, then assignment of the remaining patients on a best fit basis. The minimum length of follow-up was assessed by measuring the consistency of the clusters over time (Adjusted Rand Index and Normalized Mutual Information). An analysis of the discriminant variables was finally performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>1,607 patients were included (median follow-up: 67 months). Five patterns were defined with one pattern gathering almost all cases of treatment failure. The clustering at 5 years afforded the highest consistency with long-term follow-up. Discriminant variables for clusters were: sex, initial symptoms, delay of diagnosis, Koos grading, fundus invasion, and number of isocenters.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The definition of these robust distinct patterns is likely to help tremendously the physicians to distinguish tumor control from potential failure. We advocate for no retreatment decision before 5 years post-GKRS. Further investigations are required to decide if the dynamics of evolution can be predicted at GKRS on an individual basis.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19377,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neuro-oncology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":16.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neuro-oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/noae187\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuro-oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/noae187","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Dynamics of tumor evolution after Gammaknife radiosurgery for sporadic vestibular schwannoma: defining volumetric patterns characterizing individual trajectory.
Background: Definition of tumor control and treatment failure after Gammaknife radiosurgery (GKRS) for vestibular schwannoma (VS) is still debated. The lack of knowledge on the dynamics of tumor evolution can lead to misinterpretation and subsequent inappropriate second treatment. The aim of this study was to evaluate the post-GKRS dynamics of evolution of tumor volume, and characterize volumetric patterns.
Methods: We included patients with sporadic VS treated by GKRS with an MRI follow-up of minimum 3 years. A clustering in 2 steps was performed: definition of the patterns of evolution based on a subset of patients with the most comprehensive follow-up, then assignment of the remaining patients on a best fit basis. The minimum length of follow-up was assessed by measuring the consistency of the clusters over time (Adjusted Rand Index and Normalized Mutual Information). An analysis of the discriminant variables was finally performed.
Results: 1,607 patients were included (median follow-up: 67 months). Five patterns were defined with one pattern gathering almost all cases of treatment failure. The clustering at 5 years afforded the highest consistency with long-term follow-up. Discriminant variables for clusters were: sex, initial symptoms, delay of diagnosis, Koos grading, fundus invasion, and number of isocenters.
Conclusions: The definition of these robust distinct patterns is likely to help tremendously the physicians to distinguish tumor control from potential failure. We advocate for no retreatment decision before 5 years post-GKRS. Further investigations are required to decide if the dynamics of evolution can be predicted at GKRS on an individual basis.
期刊介绍:
Neuro-Oncology, the official journal of the Society for Neuro-Oncology, has been published monthly since January 2010. Affiliated with the Japan Society for Neuro-Oncology and the European Association of Neuro-Oncology, it is a global leader in the field.
The journal is committed to swiftly disseminating high-quality information across all areas of neuro-oncology. It features peer-reviewed articles, reviews, symposia on various topics, abstracts from annual meetings, and updates from neuro-oncology societies worldwide.