Moritz Kleinevoß, Daiwei Yao, Christian Plaass, Christina Stukenborg-Colsman, Kiriakos Daniilidis, Sarah Ettinger, Leif Claassen
{"title":"慢性踝关节不稳的外侧韧带重建和附加内侧韧带重建:一项回顾性研究。","authors":"Moritz Kleinevoß, Daiwei Yao, Christian Plaass, Christina Stukenborg-Colsman, Kiriakos Daniilidis, Sarah Ettinger, Leif Claassen","doi":"10.52965/001c.120051","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Ligamentous lesions of the ankle joint are common. Isolated medial ligament injuries are rare but are often associated with lateral ligament injuries, isolated medial ligament lesions are often overlooked. The present study aimed to evaluate the clinical and functional differences in the outcomes of isolated lateral and combined medial and lateral ligament reconstruction. The study is based on patient-reported outcome measurements and motion sensor technology to assess these outcomes.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical and functional outcomes of isolated lateral and combined lateral and medial ankle ligament reconstruction.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From December 2014 to August 2018, 111 patients underwent either isolated lateral ligament (LG) or medial and lateral ligament (MLG) reconstruction. Of the 104 patients meeting the inclusion criteria, 49 had LG and 55 had MLG reconstruction. Outcome measures included the Short Form-36 Health Survey SF-36, Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS), Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAMG), Tegner Activity Scale, the European Foot and Ankle Society (EFAS), American Orthopaedic Foot and Ancle Society (AOFAS) hindfoot score, and the Karlsson Peterson Score. Mobility and stability were assessed using the Ortheligent™ motion sensor for both healthy and treated ankles.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>While there were no significant differences in outcome scores between the groups, overall scores improved after treatment (p >0.00). Notably LG showed improved movement, with better dorsal extension measured by the Sensor (p ÷ 0.02). The sensor's results correlated significantly with FAOS subscales for pain (p ÷0.05), stiffness (p ÷ 0.01), ADL (p ÷0.02), and sports (p >0.00).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Postoperative results, regardless of LG or MLG, showed significant subjective well-being improvement. LG's advantages were highlighted by a significant improvement in dorsal extension, supported by correlated results from a portable motion sensor assessing ankle stability.</p>","PeriodicalId":19669,"journal":{"name":"Orthopedic Reviews","volume":"16 ","pages":"120051"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11386540/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Lateral ligament reconstruction and additive medial ligament reconstruction in chronic ankle instability: a retrospective study.\",\"authors\":\"Moritz Kleinevoß, Daiwei Yao, Christian Plaass, Christina Stukenborg-Colsman, Kiriakos Daniilidis, Sarah Ettinger, Leif Claassen\",\"doi\":\"10.52965/001c.120051\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Ligamentous lesions of the ankle joint are common. Isolated medial ligament injuries are rare but are often associated with lateral ligament injuries, isolated medial ligament lesions are often overlooked. The present study aimed to evaluate the clinical and functional differences in the outcomes of isolated lateral and combined medial and lateral ligament reconstruction. The study is based on patient-reported outcome measurements and motion sensor technology to assess these outcomes.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical and functional outcomes of isolated lateral and combined lateral and medial ankle ligament reconstruction.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From December 2014 to August 2018, 111 patients underwent either isolated lateral ligament (LG) or medial and lateral ligament (MLG) reconstruction. Of the 104 patients meeting the inclusion criteria, 49 had LG and 55 had MLG reconstruction. Outcome measures included the Short Form-36 Health Survey SF-36, Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS), Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAMG), Tegner Activity Scale, the European Foot and Ankle Society (EFAS), American Orthopaedic Foot and Ancle Society (AOFAS) hindfoot score, and the Karlsson Peterson Score. Mobility and stability were assessed using the Ortheligent™ motion sensor for both healthy and treated ankles.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>While there were no significant differences in outcome scores between the groups, overall scores improved after treatment (p >0.00). Notably LG showed improved movement, with better dorsal extension measured by the Sensor (p ÷ 0.02). The sensor's results correlated significantly with FAOS subscales for pain (p ÷0.05), stiffness (p ÷ 0.01), ADL (p ÷0.02), and sports (p >0.00).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Postoperative results, regardless of LG or MLG, showed significant subjective well-being improvement. LG's advantages were highlighted by a significant improvement in dorsal extension, supported by correlated results from a portable motion sensor assessing ankle stability.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19669,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Orthopedic Reviews\",\"volume\":\"16 \",\"pages\":\"120051\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11386540/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Orthopedic Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.52965/001c.120051\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Orthopedic Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52965/001c.120051","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:踝关节韧带损伤很常见。孤立的内侧韧带损伤很少见,但往往与外侧韧带损伤相关,孤立的内侧韧带损伤往往被忽视。本研究旨在评估孤立的外侧韧带重建与内外侧韧带联合重建在临床和功能上的结果差异。该研究基于患者报告的结果测量和运动传感器技术来评估这些结果:本研究旨在比较孤立外侧踝关节韧带重建与联合外侧和内侧踝关节韧带重建的临床和功能结果:2014年12月至2018年8月,111名患者接受了孤立外侧韧带(LG)或内外侧韧带(MLG)重建术。在符合纳入标准的104名患者中,49人进行了LG重建,55人进行了MLG重建。结果测量包括简表-36健康调查SF-36、足踝结果评分(FAOS)、足踝能力测量(FAAMG)、Tegner活动量表、欧洲足踝协会(EFAS)、美国矫形足踝协会(AOFAS)后足评分以及Karlsson Peterson评分。使用 Ortheligent™ 运动传感器对健康踝关节和接受治疗踝关节的活动度和稳定性进行评估:结果:虽然治疗组之间的结果评分无明显差异,但治疗后总体评分有所提高(P>0.00)。值得注意的是,LG 的运动情况有所改善,传感器测量的背伸效果更好(p ÷ 0.02)。传感器的结果与FAOS的疼痛(p ÷0.05)、僵硬(p ÷0.01)、日常活动(p ÷0.02)和运动(p >0.00)分量表有明显相关性:结论:不管是 LG 还是 MLG,术后结果都显示主观健康状况有明显改善。便携式运动传感器评估踝关节稳定性的相关结果表明,背伸功能有了明显改善,这凸显了 LG 的优势。
Lateral ligament reconstruction and additive medial ligament reconstruction in chronic ankle instability: a retrospective study.
Background: Ligamentous lesions of the ankle joint are common. Isolated medial ligament injuries are rare but are often associated with lateral ligament injuries, isolated medial ligament lesions are often overlooked. The present study aimed to evaluate the clinical and functional differences in the outcomes of isolated lateral and combined medial and lateral ligament reconstruction. The study is based on patient-reported outcome measurements and motion sensor technology to assess these outcomes.
Objective: The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical and functional outcomes of isolated lateral and combined lateral and medial ankle ligament reconstruction.
Methods: From December 2014 to August 2018, 111 patients underwent either isolated lateral ligament (LG) or medial and lateral ligament (MLG) reconstruction. Of the 104 patients meeting the inclusion criteria, 49 had LG and 55 had MLG reconstruction. Outcome measures included the Short Form-36 Health Survey SF-36, Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS), Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAMG), Tegner Activity Scale, the European Foot and Ankle Society (EFAS), American Orthopaedic Foot and Ancle Society (AOFAS) hindfoot score, and the Karlsson Peterson Score. Mobility and stability were assessed using the Ortheligent™ motion sensor for both healthy and treated ankles.
Results: While there were no significant differences in outcome scores between the groups, overall scores improved after treatment (p >0.00). Notably LG showed improved movement, with better dorsal extension measured by the Sensor (p ÷ 0.02). The sensor's results correlated significantly with FAOS subscales for pain (p ÷0.05), stiffness (p ÷ 0.01), ADL (p ÷0.02), and sports (p >0.00).
Conclusion: Postoperative results, regardless of LG or MLG, showed significant subjective well-being improvement. LG's advantages were highlighted by a significant improvement in dorsal extension, supported by correlated results from a portable motion sensor assessing ankle stability.
期刊介绍:
Orthopedic Reviews is an Open Access, online-only, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles concerned with any aspect of orthopedics, as well as diagnosis and treatment, trauma, surgical procedures, arthroscopy, sports medicine, rehabilitation, pediatric and geriatric orthopedics. All bone-related molecular and cell biology, genetics, pathophysiology and epidemiology papers are also welcome. The journal publishes original articles, brief reports, reviews and case reports of general interest.