习惯性限制一两个小时的睡眠时间会影响阻力训练的益处吗?

IF 1 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Sleep Science Pub Date : 2024-06-05 eCollection Date: 2024-09-01 DOI:10.1055/s-0044-1787297
Diego de Alcantara Borba, Lucas Alves Facundo, Valdênio Martins Brant, Carlos Magno Amaral Costa, Renato de Carvalho Guerreiro, Fernanda Veruska Narciso, Andressa da-Silva, Marco Túlio De-Mello
{"title":"习惯性限制一两个小时的睡眠时间会影响阻力训练的益处吗?","authors":"Diego de Alcantara Borba, Lucas Alves Facundo, Valdênio Martins Brant, Carlos Magno Amaral Costa, Renato de Carvalho Guerreiro, Fernanda Veruska Narciso, Andressa da-Silva, Marco Túlio De-Mello","doi":"10.1055/s-0044-1787297","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The absence or decrease in sleep time can affect different mechanisms associated with changes in body composition and physical exercise performance. However, it is unclear in the literature how chronically sleep-restricted individuals respond to strength training. Thus, this study aimed to evaluate the effects of reducing between one and two hours of recommended sleep time (7 hours) on the response to resistance training. The study included 12 subjects who slept on average 2 hours less than the recommended 7 hours per day (42 ± 8 years; 84.9 ± 11.6 kg; 27.9 ± 3.5 kg/m <sup>2</sup> ; 6:17 ± 22 total sleep time/day and 5: 47 ± 29 sleep time/night) and 12 subjects with recommended sleep time (38 ± 11 years; 78.3 ± 9.5 kg; 25.1 ± 3.5 kg/m <sup>2</sup> ; 7:47 ± 38 total sleep time/day and 7:16 ± 54 sleep time/night) and a control group (42 ± 7 years; 81 ± 12.2 kg; 26.2 ± 4.0 kg/m <sup>2</sup> ; 7:30 ± 40 total sleep time/day and 7: 17 ± 51 sleep time/night) that did not perform resistance training. A total of 16 resistance training sessions were performed, 3 times a week (Sessions= 4 exercises; 2 sets; maximum repetitions to failure). The maximum number of repetitions, arm circumference, and arm muscle area increased, while triceps skinfold decreased after training in the experimental groups ( <i>p</i>  < 0.05), with no changes for the control group. There was no difference in muscle mass, body mass index, or sleep variables (sleep time, latency, efficiency) after the training period in either group (p> 0.05). Thus, the chronic 1-2-hour reduction in average recommended sleep time was not able to affect the positive effects of resistance training.</p>","PeriodicalId":21848,"journal":{"name":"Sleep Science","volume":"17 3","pages":"e244-e254"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11390164/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Could a Habitual Sleep Restriction of One-two Hours Be Detrimental to the Benefits of Resistance Training?\",\"authors\":\"Diego de Alcantara Borba, Lucas Alves Facundo, Valdênio Martins Brant, Carlos Magno Amaral Costa, Renato de Carvalho Guerreiro, Fernanda Veruska Narciso, Andressa da-Silva, Marco Túlio De-Mello\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/s-0044-1787297\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The absence or decrease in sleep time can affect different mechanisms associated with changes in body composition and physical exercise performance. However, it is unclear in the literature how chronically sleep-restricted individuals respond to strength training. Thus, this study aimed to evaluate the effects of reducing between one and two hours of recommended sleep time (7 hours) on the response to resistance training. The study included 12 subjects who slept on average 2 hours less than the recommended 7 hours per day (42 ± 8 years; 84.9 ± 11.6 kg; 27.9 ± 3.5 kg/m <sup>2</sup> ; 6:17 ± 22 total sleep time/day and 5: 47 ± 29 sleep time/night) and 12 subjects with recommended sleep time (38 ± 11 years; 78.3 ± 9.5 kg; 25.1 ± 3.5 kg/m <sup>2</sup> ; 7:47 ± 38 total sleep time/day and 7:16 ± 54 sleep time/night) and a control group (42 ± 7 years; 81 ± 12.2 kg; 26.2 ± 4.0 kg/m <sup>2</sup> ; 7:30 ± 40 total sleep time/day and 7: 17 ± 51 sleep time/night) that did not perform resistance training. A total of 16 resistance training sessions were performed, 3 times a week (Sessions= 4 exercises; 2 sets; maximum repetitions to failure). The maximum number of repetitions, arm circumference, and arm muscle area increased, while triceps skinfold decreased after training in the experimental groups ( <i>p</i>  < 0.05), with no changes for the control group. There was no difference in muscle mass, body mass index, or sleep variables (sleep time, latency, efficiency) after the training period in either group (p> 0.05). Thus, the chronic 1-2-hour reduction in average recommended sleep time was not able to affect the positive effects of resistance training.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21848,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sleep Science\",\"volume\":\"17 3\",\"pages\":\"e244-e254\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11390164/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sleep Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0044-1787297\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/9/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sleep Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0044-1787297","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

睡眠时间的缺失或减少会影响与身体成分变化和体育锻炼表现相关的不同机制。然而,文献中尚不清楚长期睡眠不足的人对力量训练的反应。因此,本研究旨在评估减少一到两小时的建议睡眠时间(7 小时)对阻力训练反应的影响。研究对象包括 12 名平均每天睡眠时间比推荐睡眠时间(7 小时)少 2 小时的受试者(42 ± 8 岁;84.9 ± 11.6 千克;27.9 ± 3.5 千克/米 2;总睡眠时间为 6:17 ± 22 小时/天,睡眠时间为 5:47 ± 29 小时/晚)和 12 名拥有推荐睡眠时间的受试者(38 ± 11 岁;78.另外还有一个对照组(42±7 岁;81±12.2 千克;26.2±4.0 千克/米 2;7:30±40 总睡眠时间/天,7: 17±51 睡眠时间/夜)没有进行阻力训练。共进行了 16 次阻力训练,每周 3 次(次数=4 次练习;2 组;最大重复次数至失败)。训练后,实验组的最大重复次数、臂围和手臂肌肉面积增加,而肱三头肌皮褶减少(P 0.05)。因此,建议的平均睡眠时间长期减少 1-2 小时并不能影响阻力训练的积极效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Could a Habitual Sleep Restriction of One-two Hours Be Detrimental to the Benefits of Resistance Training?

The absence or decrease in sleep time can affect different mechanisms associated with changes in body composition and physical exercise performance. However, it is unclear in the literature how chronically sleep-restricted individuals respond to strength training. Thus, this study aimed to evaluate the effects of reducing between one and two hours of recommended sleep time (7 hours) on the response to resistance training. The study included 12 subjects who slept on average 2 hours less than the recommended 7 hours per day (42 ± 8 years; 84.9 ± 11.6 kg; 27.9 ± 3.5 kg/m 2 ; 6:17 ± 22 total sleep time/day and 5: 47 ± 29 sleep time/night) and 12 subjects with recommended sleep time (38 ± 11 years; 78.3 ± 9.5 kg; 25.1 ± 3.5 kg/m 2 ; 7:47 ± 38 total sleep time/day and 7:16 ± 54 sleep time/night) and a control group (42 ± 7 years; 81 ± 12.2 kg; 26.2 ± 4.0 kg/m 2 ; 7:30 ± 40 total sleep time/day and 7: 17 ± 51 sleep time/night) that did not perform resistance training. A total of 16 resistance training sessions were performed, 3 times a week (Sessions= 4 exercises; 2 sets; maximum repetitions to failure). The maximum number of repetitions, arm circumference, and arm muscle area increased, while triceps skinfold decreased after training in the experimental groups ( p  < 0.05), with no changes for the control group. There was no difference in muscle mass, body mass index, or sleep variables (sleep time, latency, efficiency) after the training period in either group (p> 0.05). Thus, the chronic 1-2-hour reduction in average recommended sleep time was not able to affect the positive effects of resistance training.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Sleep Science
Sleep Science CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
12.50%
发文量
124
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
Correction to: Can Improving Postoperative Sleep Speed Up Surgical Recovery?: Sleep Sci 2024; 17:3:335-338: São Paulo, September 20, 2024. Factors Related to the Sleep Duration of 3-Month-Old Infants. Could a Habitual Sleep Restriction of One-two Hours Be Detrimental to the Benefits of Resistance Training? Validation of a Portable Respiratory Monitoring System for the Diagnosis of Obstructive Sleep Apnea in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Crossectional Study. Sleep Debt and Insulin Resistance: What's Worse, Sleep Deprivation or Sleep Restriction?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1