骨关节尺骨异体移植物用于重建尺骨近端肿瘤的效果。

IF 2.8 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS Bone & Joint Open Pub Date : 2024-09-12 DOI:10.1302/2633-1462.59.BJO-2024-0088.R1
Sam Hajialiloo Sami, Khalil Kargar Shooroki, Wael Ammar, Shimasadat Nahvizadeh, Mohammad Mohammadi, Raza Dehghani, Babak Toloue
{"title":"骨关节尺骨异体移植物用于重建尺骨近端肿瘤的效果。","authors":"Sam Hajialiloo Sami, Khalil Kargar Shooroki, Wael Ammar, Shimasadat Nahvizadeh, Mohammad Mohammadi, Raza Dehghani, Babak Toloue","doi":"10.1302/2633-1462.59.BJO-2024-0088.R1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>The ulna is an extremely rare location for primary bone tumours of the elbow in paediatrics. Although several reconstruction options are available, the optimal reconstruction method is still unknown due to the rarity of proximal ulna tumours. In this study, we report the outcomes of osteoarticular ulna allograft for the reconstruction of proximal ulna tumours.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Medical profiles of 13 patients, who between March 2004 and November 2021 underwent osteoarticular ulna allograft reconstruction after the resection of the proximal ulna tumour, were retrospectively reviewed. The outcomes were measured clinically by the assessment of elbow range of motion (ROM), stability, and function, and radiologically by the assessment of allograft-host junction union, recurrence, and joint degeneration. The elbow function was assessed objectively by the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) score and subjectively by the Toronto Extremity Salvage Score (TESS) and Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS) questionnaire.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean follow-up of patients was 60.3 months (SD 28.5). The mean elbow flexion-extension ROM was 95.8° (SD 21). The mean MSTS of the patients was 84.4 (SD 8.2), the mean TESS was 83.8 (SD 6.7), and the mean MEPS was 79.2 (SD 11.5). All the patients had radiological union at the osteotomy site. Symptomatic osteoarthritic change was observed in three patients (23%), one of whom ended up with elbow joint fusion. Two patients (15.4%) had recurrence during the follow-up period. Surgical complications included two allograft fractures, two plate fractures, three medial instabilities, and two infections.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Osteoarticular ulna allograft reconstruction provides acceptable functional outcomes. Despite a high rate of complications, it is still a valuable reconstruction method, particularly in skeletally immature patients who need their distal humerus physis for the rest of hand growth.</p>","PeriodicalId":34103,"journal":{"name":"Bone & Joint Open","volume":"5 9","pages":"749-757"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11390184/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Outcomes of osteoarticular ulna allograft for the reconstruction of proximal ulna tumour.\",\"authors\":\"Sam Hajialiloo Sami, Khalil Kargar Shooroki, Wael Ammar, Shimasadat Nahvizadeh, Mohammad Mohammadi, Raza Dehghani, Babak Toloue\",\"doi\":\"10.1302/2633-1462.59.BJO-2024-0088.R1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>The ulna is an extremely rare location for primary bone tumours of the elbow in paediatrics. Although several reconstruction options are available, the optimal reconstruction method is still unknown due to the rarity of proximal ulna tumours. In this study, we report the outcomes of osteoarticular ulna allograft for the reconstruction of proximal ulna tumours.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Medical profiles of 13 patients, who between March 2004 and November 2021 underwent osteoarticular ulna allograft reconstruction after the resection of the proximal ulna tumour, were retrospectively reviewed. The outcomes were measured clinically by the assessment of elbow range of motion (ROM), stability, and function, and radiologically by the assessment of allograft-host junction union, recurrence, and joint degeneration. The elbow function was assessed objectively by the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) score and subjectively by the Toronto Extremity Salvage Score (TESS) and Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS) questionnaire.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean follow-up of patients was 60.3 months (SD 28.5). The mean elbow flexion-extension ROM was 95.8° (SD 21). The mean MSTS of the patients was 84.4 (SD 8.2), the mean TESS was 83.8 (SD 6.7), and the mean MEPS was 79.2 (SD 11.5). All the patients had radiological union at the osteotomy site. Symptomatic osteoarthritic change was observed in three patients (23%), one of whom ended up with elbow joint fusion. Two patients (15.4%) had recurrence during the follow-up period. Surgical complications included two allograft fractures, two plate fractures, three medial instabilities, and two infections.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Osteoarticular ulna allograft reconstruction provides acceptable functional outcomes. Despite a high rate of complications, it is still a valuable reconstruction method, particularly in skeletally immature patients who need their distal humerus physis for the rest of hand growth.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":34103,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bone & Joint Open\",\"volume\":\"5 9\",\"pages\":\"749-757\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11390184/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bone & Joint Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1302/2633-1462.59.BJO-2024-0088.R1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bone & Joint Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1302/2633-1462.59.BJO-2024-0088.R1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:尺骨是儿科中极为罕见的肘部原发性骨肿瘤部位。虽然有多种重建方案可供选择,但由于尺骨近端肿瘤的罕见性,最佳的重建方法仍是未知数。在这项研究中,我们报告了骨关节尺骨异体移植重建尺骨近端肿瘤的结果:方法:回顾性分析了2004年3月至2021年11月期间接受尺骨近端肿瘤切除术后进行骨关节尺骨异体移植重建的13名患者的医疗资料。临床上通过评估肘关节的活动范围(ROM)、稳定性和功能来衡量结果,放射学上通过评估异体-主交界处的结合、复发和关节退变来衡量结果。肘关节功能的客观评估采用肌肉骨骼肿瘤协会(MSTS)评分,主观评估采用多伦多肢体救治评分(TESS)和梅奥肘关节功能评分(MEPS)问卷:患者的平均随访时间为60.3个月(SD 28.5)。平均肘关节屈伸ROM为95.8°(SD 21)。患者的平均MSTS为84.4(SD 8.2),平均TESS为83.8(SD 6.7),平均MEPS为79.2(SD 11.5)。所有患者的截骨部位均有放射学结合。三名患者(23%)出现了症状性骨关节炎改变,其中一人最终接受了肘关节融合术。两名患者(15.4%)在随访期间复发。手术并发症包括两例异体移植物骨折、两例钢板骨折、三例内侧不稳和两例感染:结论:骨关节尺骨异体移植物重建术可提供可接受的功能结果。尽管并发症发生率较高,但仍不失为一种有价值的重建方法,尤其是对于骨骼尚未发育成熟的患者,因为他们在手部生长的其余部分需要肱骨远端躯干。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Outcomes of osteoarticular ulna allograft for the reconstruction of proximal ulna tumour.

Aims: The ulna is an extremely rare location for primary bone tumours of the elbow in paediatrics. Although several reconstruction options are available, the optimal reconstruction method is still unknown due to the rarity of proximal ulna tumours. In this study, we report the outcomes of osteoarticular ulna allograft for the reconstruction of proximal ulna tumours.

Methods: Medical profiles of 13 patients, who between March 2004 and November 2021 underwent osteoarticular ulna allograft reconstruction after the resection of the proximal ulna tumour, were retrospectively reviewed. The outcomes were measured clinically by the assessment of elbow range of motion (ROM), stability, and function, and radiologically by the assessment of allograft-host junction union, recurrence, and joint degeneration. The elbow function was assessed objectively by the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) score and subjectively by the Toronto Extremity Salvage Score (TESS) and Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS) questionnaire.

Results: The mean follow-up of patients was 60.3 months (SD 28.5). The mean elbow flexion-extension ROM was 95.8° (SD 21). The mean MSTS of the patients was 84.4 (SD 8.2), the mean TESS was 83.8 (SD 6.7), and the mean MEPS was 79.2 (SD 11.5). All the patients had radiological union at the osteotomy site. Symptomatic osteoarthritic change was observed in three patients (23%), one of whom ended up with elbow joint fusion. Two patients (15.4%) had recurrence during the follow-up period. Surgical complications included two allograft fractures, two plate fractures, three medial instabilities, and two infections.

Conclusion: Osteoarticular ulna allograft reconstruction provides acceptable functional outcomes. Despite a high rate of complications, it is still a valuable reconstruction method, particularly in skeletally immature patients who need their distal humerus physis for the rest of hand growth.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Bone & Joint Open
Bone & Joint Open ORTHOPEDICS-
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Arthroscopic Bankart repair versus arthroscopic Latarjet for anterior shoulder instability in adolescents. Revisiting the radiological signs for the first metatarsal pronation assessment. Clinical outcomes after extra-articular resection of hip joint tumour using a custom-made osteotomy guide and 3D-printed endoprosthesis with posterior column preserved. Uncompromised total knee arthroplasty function after distal femoral osteotomy. Outcomes of external versus internal fixation for traumatic lower limb fractures in low- and middle-income countries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1