腰椎病的手法治疗加性建议与单纯手法治疗或运动疗法的比较:随机对照试验。

IF 1.4 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Journal of Osteopathic Medicine Pub Date : 2024-09-12 DOI:10.1515/jom-2023-0075
Musa Sani Danazumi, Isa Abubakar Adamu, Musbahu Hamisu Usman, Abdulsalam Mohammed Yakasai
{"title":"腰椎病的手法治疗加性建议与单纯手法治疗或运动疗法的比较:随机对照试验。","authors":"Musa Sani Danazumi, Isa Abubakar Adamu, Musbahu Hamisu Usman, Abdulsalam Mohammed Yakasai","doi":"10.1515/jom-2023-0075","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>The biopsychosocial approach to managing low back pain (LBP) has the potential to improve the quality of care for patients. However, LBP trials that have utilized the biopsychosocial approach to treatment have largely neglected sexual activity, which is an important social component of individuals with LBP.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The objectives of the study are to determine the effects of manual therapy plus sexual advice (MT+SA) compared with manual therapy (MT) or exercise therapy (ET) alone in the management of individuals with lumbar disc herniation with radiculopathy (DHR) and to determine the best sexual positions for these individuals.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a single-blind randomized controlled trial. Fifty-four participants diagnosed as having chronic DHR (>3 months) were randomly allocated into three groups with 18 participants each in the MT+SA, MT and ET groups. The participants in the MT+SA group received manual therapy (including Dowling's progressive inhibition of neuromuscular structures and Mulligan's spinal mobilization with leg movement) plus sexual advice, those in the MT group received manual therapy only and those in the ET group received exercise therapy only. Each group received treatment for 12 weeks and then followed up for additional 40 weeks. The primary outcomes were pain, activity limitation, sexual disability and kinesiophobia at 12 weeks post-randomization.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The MT+SA group improved significantly better than the MT or ET group in all outcomes (except for nerve function), and at all timelines (6, 12, 26, and 52 weeks post-randomization). These improvements were also clinically meaningful for back pain, leg pain, medication intake, and functional mobility at 6 and 12 weeks post-randomization and for sexual disability, activity limitation, pain catastrophizing, and kinesiophobia at 6, 12, 26, and 52 weeks post-randomization (p<0.05). On the other hand, many preferred sexual positions for individuals with DHR emerged, with \"<i>side-lying</i>\" being the most practiced sexual position and \"<i>standing</i>\" being the least practiced sexual position by females. While \"<i>lying supine</i>\" was the most practiced sexual position and \"<i>sitting on a chair</i>\" was the least practiced sexual position by males.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study found that individuals with DHR demonstrated better improvements in all outcomes when treated with MT+SA than when treated with MT or ET alone. These improvements were also clinically meaningful for sexual disability, activity limitation, pain catastrophizing, and kinesiophobia at long-term follow-up. There is also no one-size-fits-all to sexual positioning for individuals with DHR.</p>","PeriodicalId":36050,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Osteopathic Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Manual therapy plus sexual advice compared with manual therapy or exercise therapy alone for lumbar radiculopathy: a randomized controlled trial.\",\"authors\":\"Musa Sani Danazumi, Isa Abubakar Adamu, Musbahu Hamisu Usman, Abdulsalam Mohammed Yakasai\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/jom-2023-0075\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Context: </strong>The biopsychosocial approach to managing low back pain (LBP) has the potential to improve the quality of care for patients. However, LBP trials that have utilized the biopsychosocial approach to treatment have largely neglected sexual activity, which is an important social component of individuals with LBP.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The objectives of the study are to determine the effects of manual therapy plus sexual advice (MT+SA) compared with manual therapy (MT) or exercise therapy (ET) alone in the management of individuals with lumbar disc herniation with radiculopathy (DHR) and to determine the best sexual positions for these individuals.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a single-blind randomized controlled trial. Fifty-four participants diagnosed as having chronic DHR (>3 months) were randomly allocated into three groups with 18 participants each in the MT+SA, MT and ET groups. The participants in the MT+SA group received manual therapy (including Dowling's progressive inhibition of neuromuscular structures and Mulligan's spinal mobilization with leg movement) plus sexual advice, those in the MT group received manual therapy only and those in the ET group received exercise therapy only. Each group received treatment for 12 weeks and then followed up for additional 40 weeks. The primary outcomes were pain, activity limitation, sexual disability and kinesiophobia at 12 weeks post-randomization.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The MT+SA group improved significantly better than the MT or ET group in all outcomes (except for nerve function), and at all timelines (6, 12, 26, and 52 weeks post-randomization). These improvements were also clinically meaningful for back pain, leg pain, medication intake, and functional mobility at 6 and 12 weeks post-randomization and for sexual disability, activity limitation, pain catastrophizing, and kinesiophobia at 6, 12, 26, and 52 weeks post-randomization (p<0.05). On the other hand, many preferred sexual positions for individuals with DHR emerged, with \\\"<i>side-lying</i>\\\" being the most practiced sexual position and \\\"<i>standing</i>\\\" being the least practiced sexual position by females. While \\\"<i>lying supine</i>\\\" was the most practiced sexual position and \\\"<i>sitting on a chair</i>\\\" was the least practiced sexual position by males.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study found that individuals with DHR demonstrated better improvements in all outcomes when treated with MT+SA than when treated with MT or ET alone. These improvements were also clinically meaningful for sexual disability, activity limitation, pain catastrophizing, and kinesiophobia at long-term follow-up. There is also no one-size-fits-all to sexual positioning for individuals with DHR.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36050,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Osteopathic Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Osteopathic Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/jom-2023-0075\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Osteopathic Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/jom-2023-0075","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:采用生物心理社会疗法治疗腰背痛(LBP)有可能提高患者的治疗质量。然而,利用生物心理社会方法治疗腰背痛的试验在很大程度上忽视了性活动,而性活动是腰背痛患者的一个重要社会组成部分:本研究的目的是确定手法治疗加性建议(MT+SA)与单纯手法治疗(MT)或运动治疗(ET)相比,对腰椎间盘突出症伴根性神经病(DHR)患者的治疗效果,并确定这些患者的最佳性爱姿势:这是一项单盲随机对照试验。54名被诊断为慢性腰椎间盘突出症(超过3个月)的患者被随机分配到三组,MT+SA组、MT组和ET组各18人。MT+SA组的参与者接受徒手疗法(包括道林的神经肌肉结构渐进抑制疗法和穆里根的腿部运动脊柱动员疗法)和性建议,MT组的参与者只接受徒手疗法,ET组的参与者只接受运动疗法。每组接受治疗 12 周,然后再随访 40 周。主要结果是随机后12周的疼痛、活动受限、性功能障碍和运动恐惧症:结果:MT+SA 组在随机后 6、12、26 和 52 周的所有结果(神经功能除外)和所有时间(随机后 6、12、26 和 52 周)上的改善均明显优于 MT 或 ET 组。在随机治疗后 6 周和 12 周,这些改善对背痛、腿痛、药物摄入量和功能活动度也有临床意义;在随机治疗后 6 周、12 周、26 周和 52 周,这些改善对性功能障碍、活动受限、疼痛灾难化和运动恐惧症也有临床意义("侧卧 "是女性最常用的性姿势,"站立 "是女性最不常用的性姿势。而 "仰卧 "是男性采用最多的性姿势,"坐在椅子上 "是男性采用最少的性姿势:本研究发现,与单独接受 MT 或 ET 治疗相比,接受 MT+SA 治疗的 DHR 患者在所有结果上都有更好的改善。在长期随访中,这些改善在性功能障碍、活动受限、疼痛灾难化和运动恐惧症方面也具有临床意义。对于 DHR 患者来说,性定位也没有放之四海而皆准的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Manual therapy plus sexual advice compared with manual therapy or exercise therapy alone for lumbar radiculopathy: a randomized controlled trial.

Context: The biopsychosocial approach to managing low back pain (LBP) has the potential to improve the quality of care for patients. However, LBP trials that have utilized the biopsychosocial approach to treatment have largely neglected sexual activity, which is an important social component of individuals with LBP.

Objectives: The objectives of the study are to determine the effects of manual therapy plus sexual advice (MT+SA) compared with manual therapy (MT) or exercise therapy (ET) alone in the management of individuals with lumbar disc herniation with radiculopathy (DHR) and to determine the best sexual positions for these individuals.

Methods: This was a single-blind randomized controlled trial. Fifty-four participants diagnosed as having chronic DHR (>3 months) were randomly allocated into three groups with 18 participants each in the MT+SA, MT and ET groups. The participants in the MT+SA group received manual therapy (including Dowling's progressive inhibition of neuromuscular structures and Mulligan's spinal mobilization with leg movement) plus sexual advice, those in the MT group received manual therapy only and those in the ET group received exercise therapy only. Each group received treatment for 12 weeks and then followed up for additional 40 weeks. The primary outcomes were pain, activity limitation, sexual disability and kinesiophobia at 12 weeks post-randomization.

Results: The MT+SA group improved significantly better than the MT or ET group in all outcomes (except for nerve function), and at all timelines (6, 12, 26, and 52 weeks post-randomization). These improvements were also clinically meaningful for back pain, leg pain, medication intake, and functional mobility at 6 and 12 weeks post-randomization and for sexual disability, activity limitation, pain catastrophizing, and kinesiophobia at 6, 12, 26, and 52 weeks post-randomization (p<0.05). On the other hand, many preferred sexual positions for individuals with DHR emerged, with "side-lying" being the most practiced sexual position and "standing" being the least practiced sexual position by females. While "lying supine" was the most practiced sexual position and "sitting on a chair" was the least practiced sexual position by males.

Conclusions: This study found that individuals with DHR demonstrated better improvements in all outcomes when treated with MT+SA than when treated with MT or ET alone. These improvements were also clinically meaningful for sexual disability, activity limitation, pain catastrophizing, and kinesiophobia at long-term follow-up. There is also no one-size-fits-all to sexual positioning for individuals with DHR.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Osteopathic Medicine
Journal of Osteopathic Medicine Health Professions-Complementary and Manual Therapy
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
13.30%
发文量
118
期刊最新文献
The role of osteopathic manipulative treatment for dystonia: a literature review. Improving peripheral artery disease screening and treatment: a screening, diagnosis, and treatment tool for use across multiple care settings. Effects of the Strong Hearts program at two years post program completion. 2024 AOA Research Abstracts and Student Poster Competition. Perspectives of osteopathic medical students on preclinical urology exposure: a single institution cross-sectional survey.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1