德国第一和第二次 SARS-CoV-2 感染热区出现严重 COVID-19 病程的风险因素。

IF 0.7 4区 医学 Q4 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Gesundheitswesen Pub Date : 2024-10-29 DOI:10.1055/a-2414-8447
Steffi Richter, Thomas Finkenzeller, Wolfgang Uter, Hans Drexler, Anna Wolfschmidt
{"title":"德国第一和第二次 SARS-CoV-2 感染热区出现严重 COVID-19 病程的风险因素。","authors":"Steffi Richter, Thomas Finkenzeller, Wolfgang Uter, Hans Drexler, Anna Wolfschmidt","doi":"10.1055/a-2414-8447","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>During the first wave of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, Weiden Hospital was a hotspot and was thus in an exceptional medical situation. This study deals with the question of whether the recognized risk factors for a severe course of COVID-19 also apply to the patients treated in Weiden Hospital during this time or whether other factors could have influenced patient outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In a retrospective analysis, data on 669 patients of Weiden Hospital with proven SARS-CoV-2 infections in the first year of the pandemic were evaluated. Risk factors for a severe case of COVID-19 were determined from medical and demographic information in a univariate analysis and subjected to logistic regression. The logistic regression analysis was performed for the overall collective as well as separately for patients from Wave 1 (3-6/2020) and 2 (7-12/2020).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Looking at all of 2020, significant risk factors for severe COVID-19 included being male, being a smoker, being 71 years or older, and a history of depression. All other commonly recognized risk factors were not applicable for the Weiden collective. When looking at both waves separately, in Wave 1 age was not a significant risk factor, whereas in Wave 2 an age of 61 years or older was associated with an increased risk of severe progression. For patients who were admitted to hospital in Wave 2, the risk of severe progression was reduced almost by half.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>It can be assumed that patient outcomes in Weiden's hotspot collective were predominantly determined by non-individual factors, like the difficult care situation in a hotspot clinic at the beginning of the pandemic. In preparation for future pandemics, provision of sufficient resources might significantly contribute to better patient outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":47653,"journal":{"name":"Gesundheitswesen","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Risk factors for a severe course of COVID-19 in a hotspot clinic during the first and second wave of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic in Germany].\",\"authors\":\"Steffi Richter, Thomas Finkenzeller, Wolfgang Uter, Hans Drexler, Anna Wolfschmidt\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/a-2414-8447\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>During the first wave of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, Weiden Hospital was a hotspot and was thus in an exceptional medical situation. This study deals with the question of whether the recognized risk factors for a severe course of COVID-19 also apply to the patients treated in Weiden Hospital during this time or whether other factors could have influenced patient outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In a retrospective analysis, data on 669 patients of Weiden Hospital with proven SARS-CoV-2 infections in the first year of the pandemic were evaluated. Risk factors for a severe case of COVID-19 were determined from medical and demographic information in a univariate analysis and subjected to logistic regression. The logistic regression analysis was performed for the overall collective as well as separately for patients from Wave 1 (3-6/2020) and 2 (7-12/2020).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Looking at all of 2020, significant risk factors for severe COVID-19 included being male, being a smoker, being 71 years or older, and a history of depression. All other commonly recognized risk factors were not applicable for the Weiden collective. When looking at both waves separately, in Wave 1 age was not a significant risk factor, whereas in Wave 2 an age of 61 years or older was associated with an increased risk of severe progression. For patients who were admitted to hospital in Wave 2, the risk of severe progression was reduced almost by half.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>It can be assumed that patient outcomes in Weiden's hotspot collective were predominantly determined by non-individual factors, like the difficult care situation in a hotspot clinic at the beginning of the pandemic. In preparation for future pandemics, provision of sufficient resources might significantly contribute to better patient outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47653,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Gesundheitswesen\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Gesundheitswesen\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2414-8447\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gesundheitswesen","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2414-8447","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景情况在第一波 SARS-CoV-2 大流行期间,魏登医院是一个热点地区,因此处于特殊的医疗环境中。本研究探讨的问题是,COVID-19 严重病程的公认风险因素是否也适用于这一时期在魏登医院接受治疗的患者,或者是否有其他因素会影响患者的治疗结果:在一项回顾性分析中,对魏登医院 669 名在大流行第一年经证实感染了 SARS-CoV-2 的患者的数据进行了评估。通过单变量分析从医疗和人口统计学信息中确定了 COVID-19 重症病例的风险因素,并对其进行了逻辑回归分析。逻辑回归分析是针对整个集体以及第 1 波(2020 年 3-6 月)和第 2 波(2020 年 7-12 月)的患者分别进行的:从 2020 年的总体情况来看,严重 COVID-19 的重要风险因素包括男性、吸烟者、71 岁或以上以及抑郁症病史。所有其他公认的风险因素都不适用于魏登集体。如果将两个波次分开来看,在第 1 波次中,年龄并不是一个重要的风险因素,而在第 2 波次中,61 岁或以上的年龄与病情严重的风险增加有关。对于在第二波住院的患者来说,严重恶化的风险几乎降低了一半:可以认为,魏登热点集体中患者的预后主要由非个体因素决定,例如大流行初期热点诊所中的困难护理情况。在为未来的大流行做准备时,提供充足的资源可能会大大有助于改善患者的治疗效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[Risk factors for a severe course of COVID-19 in a hotspot clinic during the first and second wave of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic in Germany].

Background: During the first wave of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, Weiden Hospital was a hotspot and was thus in an exceptional medical situation. This study deals with the question of whether the recognized risk factors for a severe course of COVID-19 also apply to the patients treated in Weiden Hospital during this time or whether other factors could have influenced patient outcomes.

Methods: In a retrospective analysis, data on 669 patients of Weiden Hospital with proven SARS-CoV-2 infections in the first year of the pandemic were evaluated. Risk factors for a severe case of COVID-19 were determined from medical and demographic information in a univariate analysis and subjected to logistic regression. The logistic regression analysis was performed for the overall collective as well as separately for patients from Wave 1 (3-6/2020) and 2 (7-12/2020).

Results: Looking at all of 2020, significant risk factors for severe COVID-19 included being male, being a smoker, being 71 years or older, and a history of depression. All other commonly recognized risk factors were not applicable for the Weiden collective. When looking at both waves separately, in Wave 1 age was not a significant risk factor, whereas in Wave 2 an age of 61 years or older was associated with an increased risk of severe progression. For patients who were admitted to hospital in Wave 2, the risk of severe progression was reduced almost by half.

Conclusion: It can be assumed that patient outcomes in Weiden's hotspot collective were predominantly determined by non-individual factors, like the difficult care situation in a hotspot clinic at the beginning of the pandemic. In preparation for future pandemics, provision of sufficient resources might significantly contribute to better patient outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Gesundheitswesen
Gesundheitswesen PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
18.20%
发文量
308
期刊介绍: The health service informs you comprehensively and up-to-date about the most important topics of the health care system. In addition to guidelines, overviews and comments, you will find current research results and contributions to CME-certified continuing education and training. The journal offers a scientific discussion forum and a platform for communications from professional societies. The content quality is ensured by a publisher body, the expert advisory board and other experts in the peer review process.
期刊最新文献
[Legal requirements for information and their influence on patient satisfaction]. [The burnout dimension emotional exhaustion and impairment of work participation: A prospective study of 2308 employees subject to social security contributions in Germany]. [Between Hippocrates and the Oath of Office: Tensions between legal, moral and role expectations with regard to Public Health Service Physician assessments of (future) public servants]. [Description of the characteristics of invasive home mechanical ventilated patients in Bavaria using routine data from the MD Bavaria]. Gesundheitsökonomische Nutzenanalyse von HNO-Zentren Simulationsbasierte Analyse des Zentreneffekts in der Kehlkopfchirurgie anhand von Bevölkerungsdaten aus Schleswig-Holstein für Larynxkarzinome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1