在脊柱侧弯手术清醒气管插管中使用雷马唑仑和右美托咪定镇静的比较:回顾性分析

IF 3.1 4区 医学 Q1 Medicine Medical Science Monitor Pub Date : 2024-09-21 DOI:10.12659/MSM.944632
Lei Zhou, Yu Huang, Rui Zhou, Siyuan Liu
{"title":"在脊柱侧弯手术清醒气管插管中使用雷马唑仑和右美托咪定镇静的比较:回顾性分析","authors":"Lei Zhou, Yu Huang, Rui Zhou, Siyuan Liu","doi":"10.12659/MSM.944632","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BACKGROUND Awake endotracheal intubation (AEI) involves the placement of an endotracheal tube in patients who can maintain spontaneous respirations. This retrospective study aimed to compare sedation with remimazolam during AEI with that of dexmedetomidine in patients who underwent scoliosis correction surgery. MATERIAL AND METHODS This is a retrospective study based on data from 98 patients who had AEI procedures between January and December 2023. The remimazolam group included 55 patients, and the dexmedetomidine group included 43 patients. Remimazolam 0.05 mg/kg was injected 1 min before intubation, while dexmedetomidine 1 ug/kg was pumped 10 min before intubation. Evaluations of AEI, hemodynamics, and respiratory adverse events were then compared between the 2 groups. RESULTS There was no significant difference in demographic data between the groups. After administrating sedation, dexmedetomidine led to a larger reduction of mean arterial pressure (MAP) and heart rate (HR) than did remimazolam (11.30±1.86 vs 8.33±2.28 mmHg, P<0.001; 12.28±2.50 vs 2.85±1.82 beats/min, P<0.001). When conducting intubation, the increase of MAP in the remimazolam group was lower than that in the dexmedetomidine group (7.40±2.81 vs 9.26±5.08 mmHg, P=0.024), while the difference in HR change was not significant (7.53±5.41 vs 8.37±5.31 beats/min, P=0.441). When combined with local anesthesia, the success rate of AEI, time of AEI procedure, attempt times, increase of MAP during intubation, depth of sedation, and respiratory adverse events were comparable between the groups (P>0.05). CONCLUSIONS With local anesthesia, remimazolam and dexmedetomidine sedation can facilitate AEI for patients with scoliosis. However, remimazolam is associated with more stable hemodynamics.</p>","PeriodicalId":48888,"journal":{"name":"Medical Science Monitor","volume":"30 ","pages":"e944632"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11423701/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Remimazolam and Dexmedetomidine for Sedation in Awake Endotracheal Intubation in Scoliosis Surgery: A Retrospective Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Lei Zhou, Yu Huang, Rui Zhou, Siyuan Liu\",\"doi\":\"10.12659/MSM.944632\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>BACKGROUND Awake endotracheal intubation (AEI) involves the placement of an endotracheal tube in patients who can maintain spontaneous respirations. This retrospective study aimed to compare sedation with remimazolam during AEI with that of dexmedetomidine in patients who underwent scoliosis correction surgery. MATERIAL AND METHODS This is a retrospective study based on data from 98 patients who had AEI procedures between January and December 2023. The remimazolam group included 55 patients, and the dexmedetomidine group included 43 patients. Remimazolam 0.05 mg/kg was injected 1 min before intubation, while dexmedetomidine 1 ug/kg was pumped 10 min before intubation. Evaluations of AEI, hemodynamics, and respiratory adverse events were then compared between the 2 groups. RESULTS There was no significant difference in demographic data between the groups. After administrating sedation, dexmedetomidine led to a larger reduction of mean arterial pressure (MAP) and heart rate (HR) than did remimazolam (11.30±1.86 vs 8.33±2.28 mmHg, P<0.001; 12.28±2.50 vs 2.85±1.82 beats/min, P<0.001). When conducting intubation, the increase of MAP in the remimazolam group was lower than that in the dexmedetomidine group (7.40±2.81 vs 9.26±5.08 mmHg, P=0.024), while the difference in HR change was not significant (7.53±5.41 vs 8.37±5.31 beats/min, P=0.441). When combined with local anesthesia, the success rate of AEI, time of AEI procedure, attempt times, increase of MAP during intubation, depth of sedation, and respiratory adverse events were comparable between the groups (P>0.05). CONCLUSIONS With local anesthesia, remimazolam and dexmedetomidine sedation can facilitate AEI for patients with scoliosis. However, remimazolam is associated with more stable hemodynamics.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48888,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medical Science Monitor\",\"volume\":\"30 \",\"pages\":\"e944632\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11423701/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medical Science Monitor\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12659/MSM.944632\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Science Monitor","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12659/MSM.944632","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景清醒气管插管(AEI)是指在能够保持自主呼吸的患者体内置入气管插管。本回顾性研究旨在比较脊柱侧弯矫正手术患者在 AEI 过程中使用瑞马唑仑和右美托咪定镇静的效果。材料与方法 这是一项回顾性研究,基于 2023 年 1 月至 12 月间 98 名接受 AEI 手术患者的数据。雷马唑仑组包括 55 名患者,右美托咪定组包括 43 名患者。在插管前 1 分钟注射雷马唑仑 0.05 毫克/千克,而在插管前 10 分钟泵入右美托咪定 1 微克/千克。然后对两组患者的 AEI、血液动力学和呼吸系统不良事件进行评估比较。结果 两组的人口统计学数据无明显差异。镇静后,右美托咪定导致的平均动脉压(MAP)和心率(HR)降低幅度大于雷马唑仑(11.30±1.86 vs 8.33±2.28 mmHg,P0.05)。结论 在局部麻醉下,雷马唑仑和右美托咪定镇静可促进脊柱侧弯患者的 AEI。然而,雷马唑仑的血液动力学更稳定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparison of Remimazolam and Dexmedetomidine for Sedation in Awake Endotracheal Intubation in Scoliosis Surgery: A Retrospective Analysis.

BACKGROUND Awake endotracheal intubation (AEI) involves the placement of an endotracheal tube in patients who can maintain spontaneous respirations. This retrospective study aimed to compare sedation with remimazolam during AEI with that of dexmedetomidine in patients who underwent scoliosis correction surgery. MATERIAL AND METHODS This is a retrospective study based on data from 98 patients who had AEI procedures between January and December 2023. The remimazolam group included 55 patients, and the dexmedetomidine group included 43 patients. Remimazolam 0.05 mg/kg was injected 1 min before intubation, while dexmedetomidine 1 ug/kg was pumped 10 min before intubation. Evaluations of AEI, hemodynamics, and respiratory adverse events were then compared between the 2 groups. RESULTS There was no significant difference in demographic data between the groups. After administrating sedation, dexmedetomidine led to a larger reduction of mean arterial pressure (MAP) and heart rate (HR) than did remimazolam (11.30±1.86 vs 8.33±2.28 mmHg, P<0.001; 12.28±2.50 vs 2.85±1.82 beats/min, P<0.001). When conducting intubation, the increase of MAP in the remimazolam group was lower than that in the dexmedetomidine group (7.40±2.81 vs 9.26±5.08 mmHg, P=0.024), while the difference in HR change was not significant (7.53±5.41 vs 8.37±5.31 beats/min, P=0.441). When combined with local anesthesia, the success rate of AEI, time of AEI procedure, attempt times, increase of MAP during intubation, depth of sedation, and respiratory adverse events were comparable between the groups (P>0.05). CONCLUSIONS With local anesthesia, remimazolam and dexmedetomidine sedation can facilitate AEI for patients with scoliosis. However, remimazolam is associated with more stable hemodynamics.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Medical Science Monitor
Medical Science Monitor MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
3.20%
发文量
514
审稿时长
3.0 months
期刊介绍: Medical Science Monitor (MSM) established in 1995 is an international, peer-reviewed scientific journal which publishes original articles in Clinical Medicine and related disciplines such as Epidemiology and Population Studies, Product Investigations, Development of Laboratory Techniques :: Diagnostics and Medical Technology which enable presentation of research or review works in overlapping areas of medicine and technology such us (but not limited to): medical diagnostics, medical imaging systems, computer simulation of health and disease processes, new medical devices, etc. Reviews and Special Reports - papers may be accepted on the basis that they provide a systematic, critical and up-to-date overview of literature pertaining to research or clinical topics. Meta-analyses are considered as reviews. A special attention will be paid to a teaching value of a review paper. Medical Science Monitor is internationally indexed in Thomson-Reuters Web of Science, Journals Citation Report (JCR), Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI), Index Medicus MEDLINE, PubMed, PMC, EMBASE/Excerpta Medica, Chemical Abstracts CAS and Index Copernicus.
期刊最新文献
Computed Tomography Parameters for Prognosis Prediction in Non-Occlusive Mesenteric Ischemia. Optimizing Anesthetic Management for Laparoscopic Surgery: A Comprehensive Review. Impact of Prior Cesarean Delivery on Pregnancy Outcomes and Hemorrhage Risks in Complete Placenta Previa: A Decade-Long Retrospective Analysis. Analysis of Mortality Causes and Locations in Veterans with ALS: A Decade Review. Surgical Advances in the Treatment of Acromioclavicular Joint Injury: A Comprehensive Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1