{"title":"基于门诊和远程康复的运动控制训练对慢性腰痛患者的影响--一项为期 3 个月随访的随机对照试验。","authors":"Aybüke Fanuscu, Müzeyyen Öz, Yasemin Özel Asliyüce, Egemen Turhan, Özlem Ülger","doi":"10.1097/AJP.0000000000001245","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the effectiveness of clinic-based and telerehabilitation-based motor control exercises in individuals with chronic low-back pain 3 months posttreatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Forty-two participants were randomized to either clinic-based or telerehabilitation-based groups, performing exercises 3 times weekly for 8 weeks. Assessments were conducted pre-intervention, postintervention and 1 and 3 month follow-ups. The primary outcome was pain intensity (Visual Analog Scale) for low-back pain.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both exercise approaches were found to be similarly effective in improving pain disability, quality of life (except for emotional response, energy level, sleep, and social isolation), and pain catastrophizing at both follow-up time points. The Visual Analog Scale showed statistically significant reductions in pain from baseline at all time points in both groups ( P <0.001), with effect sizes ranging from moderate to strong. Nottingham Health Profile showed significant improvements in physical activity, pain, and total score, with effect sizes ranging from moderate to strong. No statistically significant changes in spatiotemporal gait parameters were observed in either group. According to the postintervention intention-to-treat analysis, lumbar flexion range of motion showed statistically significant improvements in both groups with small effect sizes ( P <0.05).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Telerehabilitation-based motor control exercises proved as effective as clinic-based methods in treating chronic low-back pain, offering a viable alternative tailored to individual needs and circumstances.</p>","PeriodicalId":50678,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Journal of Pain","volume":" ","pages":"700-708"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of Clinic-based and Telerehabilitation-based Motor Control Exercises in Individuals with Chronic Low-back Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial With 3-Month Follow-up.\",\"authors\":\"Aybüke Fanuscu, Müzeyyen Öz, Yasemin Özel Asliyüce, Egemen Turhan, Özlem Ülger\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/AJP.0000000000001245\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the effectiveness of clinic-based and telerehabilitation-based motor control exercises in individuals with chronic low-back pain 3 months posttreatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Forty-two participants were randomized to either clinic-based or telerehabilitation-based groups, performing exercises 3 times weekly for 8 weeks. Assessments were conducted pre-intervention, postintervention and 1 and 3 month follow-ups. The primary outcome was pain intensity (Visual Analog Scale) for low-back pain.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both exercise approaches were found to be similarly effective in improving pain disability, quality of life (except for emotional response, energy level, sleep, and social isolation), and pain catastrophizing at both follow-up time points. The Visual Analog Scale showed statistically significant reductions in pain from baseline at all time points in both groups ( P <0.001), with effect sizes ranging from moderate to strong. Nottingham Health Profile showed significant improvements in physical activity, pain, and total score, with effect sizes ranging from moderate to strong. No statistically significant changes in spatiotemporal gait parameters were observed in either group. According to the postintervention intention-to-treat analysis, lumbar flexion range of motion showed statistically significant improvements in both groups with small effect sizes ( P <0.05).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Telerehabilitation-based motor control exercises proved as effective as clinic-based methods in treating chronic low-back pain, offering a viable alternative tailored to individual needs and circumstances.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50678,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Journal of Pain\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"700-708\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Journal of Pain\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/AJP.0000000000001245\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Journal of Pain","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/AJP.0000000000001245","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Effects of Clinic-based and Telerehabilitation-based Motor Control Exercises in Individuals with Chronic Low-back Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial With 3-Month Follow-up.
Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of clinic-based and telerehabilitation-based motor control exercises in individuals with chronic low-back pain 3 months posttreatment.
Methods: Forty-two participants were randomized to either clinic-based or telerehabilitation-based groups, performing exercises 3 times weekly for 8 weeks. Assessments were conducted pre-intervention, postintervention and 1 and 3 month follow-ups. The primary outcome was pain intensity (Visual Analog Scale) for low-back pain.
Results: Both exercise approaches were found to be similarly effective in improving pain disability, quality of life (except for emotional response, energy level, sleep, and social isolation), and pain catastrophizing at both follow-up time points. The Visual Analog Scale showed statistically significant reductions in pain from baseline at all time points in both groups ( P <0.001), with effect sizes ranging from moderate to strong. Nottingham Health Profile showed significant improvements in physical activity, pain, and total score, with effect sizes ranging from moderate to strong. No statistically significant changes in spatiotemporal gait parameters were observed in either group. According to the postintervention intention-to-treat analysis, lumbar flexion range of motion showed statistically significant improvements in both groups with small effect sizes ( P <0.05).
Discussion: Telerehabilitation-based motor control exercises proved as effective as clinic-based methods in treating chronic low-back pain, offering a viable alternative tailored to individual needs and circumstances.
期刊介绍:
The Clinical Journal of Pain explores all aspects of pain and its effective treatment, bringing readers the insights of leading anesthesiologists, surgeons, internists, neurologists, orthopedists, psychiatrists and psychologists, clinical pharmacologists, and rehabilitation medicine specialists. This peer-reviewed journal presents timely and thought-provoking articles on clinical dilemmas in pain management; valuable diagnostic procedures; promising new pharmacological, surgical, and other therapeutic modalities; psychosocial dimensions of pain; and ethical issues of concern to all medical professionals. The journal also publishes Special Topic issues on subjects of particular relevance to the practice of pain medicine.