及时自适应应用程序对增加每日步数的效果:一项 RCT。

IF 4.3 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL American Journal of Preventive Medicine Pub Date : 2024-09-17 DOI:10.1016/j.amepre.2024.09.010
Anne L Vos, Gert-Jan de Bruijn, Michel C A Klein, Sophie C Boerman, Josine M Stuber, Edith G Smit
{"title":"及时自适应应用程序对增加每日步数的效果:一项 RCT。","authors":"Anne L Vos, Gert-Jan de Bruijn, Michel C A Klein, Sophie C Boerman, Josine M Stuber, Edith G Smit","doi":"10.1016/j.amepre.2024.09.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Addressing the public health problem of physical inactivity, this study evaluates SNapp, a just-in-time adaptive app intervention to promote walking through dynamically tailored coaching content. It assesses SNapp's impact on daily steps and how users' perceptions regarding ease of use and usefulness moderated its effectiveness.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>SNapp was evaluated in an RCT from February 2021 to May 2022.This trial was preregistered in the Dutch Trial Register (NL7064). Analyses were conducted in November 2022. A total of 176 adults (76% female, mean age of 56 years) were randomized to a control group receiving a step counter app (n=89) or an intervention group receiving the app plus coaching content (n=87). SNapp's coaching content encompasses individually tailored feedback on step counts and advice to engage in more walking, taking preferences regarding behavior change techniques into account. Additionally, SNapp provides contextualized content calling attention to suitable walking locations in the user's environment. The primary outcome was daily step count as recorded by the step counter app. User perceptions regarding ease of use and usefulness were assessed via survey at 3-month follow-up.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mixed models indicated that the intervention did not significantly impact step counts on average over time (B= -202.30, 95% CI= -889.7, 485.1), with the coefficient indicating that the intervention group walked fewer steps per day on average, though this difference was not statistically significant. Perceived ease of use did not moderate the intervention effect (B<sub>group × perceived ease of use</sub>=38.60, 90% CI= -276.5, 353.7). Perceived usefulness significantly moderated the intervention effect (B<sub>group × perceived usefulness</sub>=344.38, 90% CI=40.4, 648.3).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>SNapp increased steps only in users who deemed the app useful, underscoring the importance of user perceptions in app-based interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":50805,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Preventive Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effectiveness of a Just-In-Time Adaptive App to Increase Daily Steps: An RCT.\",\"authors\":\"Anne L Vos, Gert-Jan de Bruijn, Michel C A Klein, Sophie C Boerman, Josine M Stuber, Edith G Smit\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.amepre.2024.09.010\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Addressing the public health problem of physical inactivity, this study evaluates SNapp, a just-in-time adaptive app intervention to promote walking through dynamically tailored coaching content. It assesses SNapp's impact on daily steps and how users' perceptions regarding ease of use and usefulness moderated its effectiveness.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>SNapp was evaluated in an RCT from February 2021 to May 2022.This trial was preregistered in the Dutch Trial Register (NL7064). Analyses were conducted in November 2022. A total of 176 adults (76% female, mean age of 56 years) were randomized to a control group receiving a step counter app (n=89) or an intervention group receiving the app plus coaching content (n=87). SNapp's coaching content encompasses individually tailored feedback on step counts and advice to engage in more walking, taking preferences regarding behavior change techniques into account. Additionally, SNapp provides contextualized content calling attention to suitable walking locations in the user's environment. The primary outcome was daily step count as recorded by the step counter app. User perceptions regarding ease of use and usefulness were assessed via survey at 3-month follow-up.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mixed models indicated that the intervention did not significantly impact step counts on average over time (B= -202.30, 95% CI= -889.7, 485.1), with the coefficient indicating that the intervention group walked fewer steps per day on average, though this difference was not statistically significant. Perceived ease of use did not moderate the intervention effect (B<sub>group × perceived ease of use</sub>=38.60, 90% CI= -276.5, 353.7). Perceived usefulness significantly moderated the intervention effect (B<sub>group × perceived usefulness</sub>=344.38, 90% CI=40.4, 648.3).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>SNapp increased steps only in users who deemed the app useful, underscoring the importance of user perceptions in app-based interventions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50805,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Preventive Medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Preventive Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2024.09.010\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Preventive Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2024.09.010","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介为了解决缺乏运动这一公共卫生问题,本研究对 "SNapp "进行了评估。"SNapp "是一款适时自适应应用程序,通过动态定制的指导内容促进步行。研究评估了SNapp对每日步数的影响,以及用户对易用性和实用性的看法如何调节其有效性:研究设计:2021 年 2 月至 2022 年 5 月对 SNapp 进行了 RCT 评估。分析于 2022 年 11 月进行:176名成年人(76%为女性,平均年龄56岁)被随机分配到接受计步器应用的对照组(89人)或接受应用加辅导内容的干预组(87人):SNapp的指导内容包括针对个人的计步反馈和多走路的建议,同时考虑到行为改变技术方面的偏好。此外,SNapp 还提供情景化内容,提醒用户注意周围环境中适合步行的地点:主要结果:主要结果是计步器应用记录的每日步数。主要结果测量:主要结果是计步器应用记录的每日步数,用户对易用性和实用性的看法在3个月的随访中通过调查进行评估:混合模型显示,随着时间的推移,干预措施对平均步数没有显著影响(B = -202.30,95% CI = -889.7,485.1),系数表明干预组平均每天行走的步数减少了,但这一差异在统计学上并不显著。感知易用性对干预效果没有调节作用(B 组 x 感知易用性 = 38.60,90% CI = -276.5, 353.7)。感知有用性明显调节了干预效果(B 组 x 感知有用性 = 344.38,90% CI = 40.4,648.3):结论:只有那些认为 SNapp 有用的用户才会增加步数,这突出了用户认知在基于应用的干预中的重要性:该试验已在荷兰试验登记处(NL7064)进行了预先登记。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Effectiveness of a Just-In-Time Adaptive App to Increase Daily Steps: An RCT.

Introduction: Addressing the public health problem of physical inactivity, this study evaluates SNapp, a just-in-time adaptive app intervention to promote walking through dynamically tailored coaching content. It assesses SNapp's impact on daily steps and how users' perceptions regarding ease of use and usefulness moderated its effectiveness.

Methods: SNapp was evaluated in an RCT from February 2021 to May 2022.This trial was preregistered in the Dutch Trial Register (NL7064). Analyses were conducted in November 2022. A total of 176 adults (76% female, mean age of 56 years) were randomized to a control group receiving a step counter app (n=89) or an intervention group receiving the app plus coaching content (n=87). SNapp's coaching content encompasses individually tailored feedback on step counts and advice to engage in more walking, taking preferences regarding behavior change techniques into account. Additionally, SNapp provides contextualized content calling attention to suitable walking locations in the user's environment. The primary outcome was daily step count as recorded by the step counter app. User perceptions regarding ease of use and usefulness were assessed via survey at 3-month follow-up.

Results: Mixed models indicated that the intervention did not significantly impact step counts on average over time (B= -202.30, 95% CI= -889.7, 485.1), with the coefficient indicating that the intervention group walked fewer steps per day on average, though this difference was not statistically significant. Perceived ease of use did not moderate the intervention effect (Bgroup × perceived ease of use=38.60, 90% CI= -276.5, 353.7). Perceived usefulness significantly moderated the intervention effect (Bgroup × perceived usefulness=344.38, 90% CI=40.4, 648.3).

Conclusions: SNapp increased steps only in users who deemed the app useful, underscoring the importance of user perceptions in app-based interventions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
American Journal of Preventive Medicine
American Journal of Preventive Medicine 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
1.80%
发文量
395
审稿时长
32 days
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Preventive Medicine is the official journal of the American College of Preventive Medicine and the Association for Prevention Teaching and Research. It publishes articles in the areas of prevention research, teaching, practice and policy. Original research is published on interventions aimed at the prevention of chronic and acute disease and the promotion of individual and community health. Of particular emphasis are papers that address the primary and secondary prevention of important clinical, behavioral and public health issues such as injury and violence, infectious disease, women''s health, smoking, sedentary behaviors and physical activity, nutrition, diabetes, obesity, and substance use disorders. Papers also address educational initiatives aimed at improving the ability of health professionals to provide effective clinical prevention and public health services. Papers on health services research pertinent to prevention and public health are also published. The journal also publishes official policy statements from the two co-sponsoring organizations, review articles, media reviews, and editorials. Finally, the journal periodically publishes supplements and special theme issues devoted to areas of current interest to the prevention community.
期刊最新文献
Chronic Opioid Use Following Implementation of Oregon's Medicaid Back Pain Policy. Clinician response to the 2021 USPSTF recommendation for colorectal cancer screening in average risk adults aged 45-49 years. Cost-effectiveness of mandating calorie labels on prepared foods in supermarkets. Disparities in tobacco smoking and risk of cardiovascular disease in people with low socioeconomic status or serious psychological distress: A simulation analysis. Factors associated with mental healthcare utilization among United States military personnel with posttraumatic stress disorder or depression symptoms.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1