在 ACO 中,教学医院能为商业受益人带来什么价值?

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES American Journal of Managed Care Pub Date : 2024-09-01 DOI:10.37765/ajmc.2024.89607
Matthew C Baker, Theresa R F Dreyer, Erin Naomi Hahn, Keith A Horvath
{"title":"在 ACO 中,教学医院能为商业受益人带来什么价值?","authors":"Matthew C Baker, Theresa R F Dreyer, Erin Naomi Hahn, Keith A Horvath","doi":"10.37765/ajmc.2024.89607","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The number of commercial beneficiaries cared for by accountable care organizations (ACOs) is growing, but the literature examining their trends is nascent.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>We examined commercial claims data from 2019 to 2021 to compare beneficiaries attributed to participants in Medicare Shared Savings Program ACOs with and without a major teaching hospital.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We calculated mortality and spending by setting for each ACO type by year.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared with per-beneficiary rates at nonteaching ACOs, major teaching ACOs have lower mortality rates by up to 2.2 percentage points depending on the patient age group, $283 lower inpatient spending, and lower emergency department utilization in inpatient (-0.008) and outpatient (-0.013) settings, as well as $146 higher overall outpatient spending. Upward trends in mortality and beneficiary risk scores across both ACO types show disruption to health outcomes during COVID-19.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These results provide evidence that ACOs with major teaching hospitals may be more likely to achieve the value-based goals of ACOs. Means to accomplish those goals may include avoiding higher-intensity care and supporting access to lower-cost alternatives where clinically appropriate, such as reducing inpatient and emergency department stays by delivering timely, high-quality outpatient care.</p>","PeriodicalId":50808,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Managed Care","volume":"30 Spec No. 10","pages":"SP738-SP744"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"What value do teaching hospitals provide commercial beneficiaries when in an ACO?\",\"authors\":\"Matthew C Baker, Theresa R F Dreyer, Erin Naomi Hahn, Keith A Horvath\",\"doi\":\"10.37765/ajmc.2024.89607\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The number of commercial beneficiaries cared for by accountable care organizations (ACOs) is growing, but the literature examining their trends is nascent.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>We examined commercial claims data from 2019 to 2021 to compare beneficiaries attributed to participants in Medicare Shared Savings Program ACOs with and without a major teaching hospital.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We calculated mortality and spending by setting for each ACO type by year.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared with per-beneficiary rates at nonteaching ACOs, major teaching ACOs have lower mortality rates by up to 2.2 percentage points depending on the patient age group, $283 lower inpatient spending, and lower emergency department utilization in inpatient (-0.008) and outpatient (-0.013) settings, as well as $146 higher overall outpatient spending. Upward trends in mortality and beneficiary risk scores across both ACO types show disruption to health outcomes during COVID-19.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These results provide evidence that ACOs with major teaching hospitals may be more likely to achieve the value-based goals of ACOs. Means to accomplish those goals may include avoiding higher-intensity care and supporting access to lower-cost alternatives where clinically appropriate, such as reducing inpatient and emergency department stays by delivering timely, high-quality outpatient care.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50808,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Managed Care\",\"volume\":\"30 Spec No. 10\",\"pages\":\"SP738-SP744\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Managed Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.37765/ajmc.2024.89607\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Managed Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37765/ajmc.2024.89607","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究目的由责任医疗组织(ACOs)提供医疗服务的商业受益人数量正在不断增加,但研究其发展趋势的文献却刚刚起步:研究设计:我们研究了 2019 年至 2021 年的商业索赔数据,以比较医疗保险共享储蓄计划 ACO 参与者的受益人有无主要教学医院:我们按年度计算了每种 ACO 类型的死亡率和支出:与非教学型 ACO 的人均受益率相比,主要教学型 ACO 的死亡率根据患者年龄组的不同最多可降低 2.2 个百分点,住院费用降低 283 美元,住院(-0.008)和门诊(-0.013)急诊使用率降低,门诊总费用增加 146 美元。两类 ACO 的死亡率和受益人风险评分均呈上升趋势,这表明 COVID-19 期间的健康结果受到了干扰:这些结果证明,拥有大型教学医院的 ACO 更有可能实现以价值为基础的 ACO 目标。实现这些目标的方法可能包括避免高强度护理,并在临床适当的情况下支持使用成本较低的替代方法,例如通过提供及时、优质的门诊护理来减少住院和急诊停留时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
What value do teaching hospitals provide commercial beneficiaries when in an ACO?

Objectives: The number of commercial beneficiaries cared for by accountable care organizations (ACOs) is growing, but the literature examining their trends is nascent.

Study design: We examined commercial claims data from 2019 to 2021 to compare beneficiaries attributed to participants in Medicare Shared Savings Program ACOs with and without a major teaching hospital.

Methods: We calculated mortality and spending by setting for each ACO type by year.

Results: Compared with per-beneficiary rates at nonteaching ACOs, major teaching ACOs have lower mortality rates by up to 2.2 percentage points depending on the patient age group, $283 lower inpatient spending, and lower emergency department utilization in inpatient (-0.008) and outpatient (-0.013) settings, as well as $146 higher overall outpatient spending. Upward trends in mortality and beneficiary risk scores across both ACO types show disruption to health outcomes during COVID-19.

Conclusions: These results provide evidence that ACOs with major teaching hospitals may be more likely to achieve the value-based goals of ACOs. Means to accomplish those goals may include avoiding higher-intensity care and supporting access to lower-cost alternatives where clinically appropriate, such as reducing inpatient and emergency department stays by delivering timely, high-quality outpatient care.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
American Journal of Managed Care
American Journal of Managed Care 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
177
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Managed Care is an independent, peer-reviewed publication dedicated to disseminating clinical information to managed care physicians, clinical decision makers, and other healthcare professionals. Its aim is to stimulate scientific communication in the ever-evolving field of managed care. The American Journal of Managed Care addresses a broad range of issues relevant to clinical decision making in a cost-constrained environment and examines the impact of clinical, management, and policy interventions and programs on healthcare and economic outcomes.
期刊最新文献
Health disparities in HIV care and strategies for improving equitable access to care. Financial navigation: lessons from a program in practice. Veterans Health Administration benefit value has little effect on reliance. Bundled payment impacts uptake of prescribed home health care. Development of multipayer claims-based emergency department episodes of care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1