远程心理干预对焦虑和抑郁症状患者的疗效:系统回顾与元分析》。

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Telemedicine and e-Health Pub Date : 2024-09-20 DOI:10.1089/tmj.2024.0297
Priscila Oliveira Machado Cecagno, Natália Donati Polesello, Tatiana Duque-Cartagena, Pedro Machado Luz, Eduardo Mundstock, Marcello Dala Bernardina Dalla, Douglas Kazutoshi Sato, Rita Mattiello
{"title":"远程心理干预对焦虑和抑郁症状患者的疗效:系统回顾与元分析》。","authors":"Priscila Oliveira Machado Cecagno, Natália Donati Polesello, Tatiana Duque-Cartagena, Pedro Machado Luz, Eduardo Mundstock, Marcello Dala Bernardina Dalla, Douglas Kazutoshi Sato, Rita Mattiello","doi":"10.1089/tmj.2024.0297","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Anxiety and depression are common mental disorders that are highly prevalent worldwide. Clinical trials have found that telehealth interventions result in increased accessibility and improved mental treatment effectiveness. However, a few comprehensive syntheses of evidence from randomized clinical trials that have been conducted to evaluate remote psychological vs face-to-face interventions for anxiety and depression are not conclusive. The objective of this work was to evaluate the efficacy of remote psychological interventions for patients with anxiety and depression symptoms. <b>Methods:</b> Randomized clinical trials with the following criteria were included: participants aged ≥5 years, of both sexes, and who underwent psychological therapy to treat anxiety and or depression symptoms. They were randomized to receive the same psychological treatment remotely or face-to-face. Review studies, animal studies, pilot studies, and studies with patients diagnosed with chronic diseases were excluded. Searches were performed on March 2024 in the following databases: MEDLINE, EMBASE, LILACS, CENTRAL, CINAHL, Web of Science, SciELO, APA PsycINFO, and Scopus. The meta-analysis was conducted using the random-effects model, and the standardized mean difference with the 95% confidence interval (CI) was used to estimate the effect. <b>Results:</b> Six studies were included in this systematic review. The meta-analysis showed no statistically significant difference when comparing remote or face-to-face treatment for depression (SMD of -0.10 [95% CI: -0.57 to 0.37; <i>I</i><sup>2</sup>: 77%]) and anxiety (SMD of -0.06 [95% CI: -0.34 to 0.21; <i>I</i><sup>2</sup>: 0%]) symptoms. <b>Conclusion:</b> Our meta-analysis indicates that remote psychotherapy demonstrates comparable efficacy to face-to-face care in mitigating symptoms of depression and anxiety. It allows patients to select the best modality for their daily routines, promoting greater engagement and adherence to treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":54434,"journal":{"name":"Telemedicine and e-Health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy of Remote Psychological Interventions for Patients with Anxiety and Depression Symptoms: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Priscila Oliveira Machado Cecagno, Natália Donati Polesello, Tatiana Duque-Cartagena, Pedro Machado Luz, Eduardo Mundstock, Marcello Dala Bernardina Dalla, Douglas Kazutoshi Sato, Rita Mattiello\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/tmj.2024.0297\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Anxiety and depression are common mental disorders that are highly prevalent worldwide. Clinical trials have found that telehealth interventions result in increased accessibility and improved mental treatment effectiveness. However, a few comprehensive syntheses of evidence from randomized clinical trials that have been conducted to evaluate remote psychological vs face-to-face interventions for anxiety and depression are not conclusive. The objective of this work was to evaluate the efficacy of remote psychological interventions for patients with anxiety and depression symptoms. <b>Methods:</b> Randomized clinical trials with the following criteria were included: participants aged ≥5 years, of both sexes, and who underwent psychological therapy to treat anxiety and or depression symptoms. They were randomized to receive the same psychological treatment remotely or face-to-face. Review studies, animal studies, pilot studies, and studies with patients diagnosed with chronic diseases were excluded. Searches were performed on March 2024 in the following databases: MEDLINE, EMBASE, LILACS, CENTRAL, CINAHL, Web of Science, SciELO, APA PsycINFO, and Scopus. The meta-analysis was conducted using the random-effects model, and the standardized mean difference with the 95% confidence interval (CI) was used to estimate the effect. <b>Results:</b> Six studies were included in this systematic review. The meta-analysis showed no statistically significant difference when comparing remote or face-to-face treatment for depression (SMD of -0.10 [95% CI: -0.57 to 0.37; <i>I</i><sup>2</sup>: 77%]) and anxiety (SMD of -0.06 [95% CI: -0.34 to 0.21; <i>I</i><sup>2</sup>: 0%]) symptoms. <b>Conclusion:</b> Our meta-analysis indicates that remote psychotherapy demonstrates comparable efficacy to face-to-face care in mitigating symptoms of depression and anxiety. It allows patients to select the best modality for their daily routines, promoting greater engagement and adherence to treatment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54434,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Telemedicine and e-Health\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Telemedicine and e-Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2024.0297\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Telemedicine and e-Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2024.0297","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:焦虑症和抑郁症是常见的精神疾病,在全球范围内发病率很高。临床试验发现,远程医疗干预能提高心理治疗的可及性和有效性。然而,针对焦虑症和抑郁症的远程心理干预与面对面干预进行评估的随机临床试验证据的综合分析并不全面。本研究旨在评估远程心理干预对焦虑和抑郁症状患者的疗效。研究方法纳入符合以下标准的随机临床试验:参与者年龄≥5 岁,男女不限,接受心理治疗以治疗焦虑和抑郁症状。他们被随机分配到远程或面对面接受相同的心理治疗。综述性研究、动物实验研究、试验性研究以及针对慢性病患者的研究均被排除在外。2024 年 3 月在以下数据库中进行了检索:MEDLINE、EMBASE、LILACS、CENTRAL、CINAHL、Web of Science、SciELO、APA PsycINFO 和 Scopus。采用随机效应模型进行荟萃分析,并使用标准化平均差和 95% 置信区间 (CI) 来估计效果。结果本系统综述共纳入六项研究。荟萃分析表明,比较远程治疗和面对面治疗对抑郁症状(SMD 为-0.10 [95% CI:-0.57 至 0.37;I2:77%])和焦虑症状(SMD 为-0.06 [95% CI:-0.34 至 0.21;I2:0%])的治疗效果,两者在统计学上没有显著差异。结论我们的荟萃分析表明,远程心理治疗在减轻抑郁和焦虑症状方面的疗效与面对面治疗不相上下。远程心理治疗允许患者选择最适合其日常生活的方式,从而提高了患者的参与度和治疗的依从性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Efficacy of Remote Psychological Interventions for Patients with Anxiety and Depression Symptoms: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Background: Anxiety and depression are common mental disorders that are highly prevalent worldwide. Clinical trials have found that telehealth interventions result in increased accessibility and improved mental treatment effectiveness. However, a few comprehensive syntheses of evidence from randomized clinical trials that have been conducted to evaluate remote psychological vs face-to-face interventions for anxiety and depression are not conclusive. The objective of this work was to evaluate the efficacy of remote psychological interventions for patients with anxiety and depression symptoms. Methods: Randomized clinical trials with the following criteria were included: participants aged ≥5 years, of both sexes, and who underwent psychological therapy to treat anxiety and or depression symptoms. They were randomized to receive the same psychological treatment remotely or face-to-face. Review studies, animal studies, pilot studies, and studies with patients diagnosed with chronic diseases were excluded. Searches were performed on March 2024 in the following databases: MEDLINE, EMBASE, LILACS, CENTRAL, CINAHL, Web of Science, SciELO, APA PsycINFO, and Scopus. The meta-analysis was conducted using the random-effects model, and the standardized mean difference with the 95% confidence interval (CI) was used to estimate the effect. Results: Six studies were included in this systematic review. The meta-analysis showed no statistically significant difference when comparing remote or face-to-face treatment for depression (SMD of -0.10 [95% CI: -0.57 to 0.37; I2: 77%]) and anxiety (SMD of -0.06 [95% CI: -0.34 to 0.21; I2: 0%]) symptoms. Conclusion: Our meta-analysis indicates that remote psychotherapy demonstrates comparable efficacy to face-to-face care in mitigating symptoms of depression and anxiety. It allows patients to select the best modality for their daily routines, promoting greater engagement and adherence to treatment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Telemedicine and e-Health
Telemedicine and e-Health 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
8.80
自引率
6.40%
发文量
270
审稿时长
2.3 months
期刊介绍: Telemedicine and e-Health is the leading peer-reviewed journal for cutting-edge telemedicine applications for achieving optimal patient care and outcomes. It places special emphasis on the impact of telemedicine on the quality, cost effectiveness, and access to healthcare. Telemedicine applications play an increasingly important role in health care. They offer indispensable tools for home healthcare, remote patient monitoring, and disease management, not only for rural health and battlefield care, but also for nursing home, assisted living facilities, and maritime and aviation settings. Telemedicine and e-Health offers timely coverage of the advances in technology that offer practitioners, medical centers, and hospitals new and innovative options for managing patient care, electronic records, and medical billing.
期刊最新文献
Quality of Life Among Patients with Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction Receiving Telemedicine Care in Vietnam. The Association Between Telehealth Use During Buprenorphine Treatment for Opioid Use Disorder and Clinical Outcomes: A Retrospective Cohort Study. Acceptability of Forensic Sexual Assault Telehealth Consultation. Taking a Step Back or a Step Forward. Tele-Critical Care, Severity of Illness, and 30-Day Mortality Risk: A Retrospective, Cohort Analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1