A retrospective study on different kind of cartilage frameworks on Asian rhinoplasty.

Background: The character of Asian nose usually presents low projection of tip, short columellar, and short nose, necessitating the construction of a cartilage framework to achieve optimal results. The objective of this study was to evaluate the structural characteristics, stability, and postoperative outcomes of the integrated fixed framework, 1+1 framework, 2+1 framework, 4+1 framework, and Y-shaped framework.

Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on a cohort of 612 patients who underwent rhinoplasty and were admitted between February 2017 and December 2022. According to rhinoplasty framework, the patients were categorized into fixed frameworks (integrated fixed framework group, 1+1 framework group, 2+1 framework group) or elastic frameworks(4+1 framework group, Y-shaped framework group). The stability of rhinoplasty frameworks was assessed by measuring nasal tip projection and nasolabial angle at both one and twelve months post-surgery. Postoperative follow-up included monitoring complications occurrence and evaluating patient satisfaction.

Results: The mean duration of follow-up was 25.23 months (rang from 24 to 54 months). The overall satisfaction rate reached 89.37 %(547/612), with the highest satisfaction rate observed in 2+1 framework group.Compared with the integrated fixed, 1+1, 2+1 framework group, the nasolabial angle and nasal tip projection of 4+1, and Y-shaped framework group decreased more obviously(P < 0.001).

Conclusions: Nasal frameworks in Asians are generally classified as fixed frameworks or elastic frameworks. The stability of the fixed frameworks surpasses that of the elastic frameworks. The secure fixation of the strut to the anterior nasal spine can enhance the overall stability of the framework.

Level of evidence statement: IV.