乳房美容整形手术中的术前患者指导和教育:人工智能大语言模型的创新应用。

Aesthetic surgery journal. Open forum Pub Date : 2024-08-13 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1093/asjof/ojae062
Jad Abi-Rafeh, Brian Bassiri-Tehrani, Roy Kazan, Heather Furnas, Dennis Hammond, William P Adams, Foad Nahai
{"title":"乳房美容整形手术中的术前患者指导和教育:人工智能大语言模型的创新应用。","authors":"Jad Abi-Rafeh, Brian Bassiri-Tehrani, Roy Kazan, Heather Furnas, Dennis Hammond, William P Adams, Foad Nahai","doi":"10.1093/asjof/ojae062","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>At a time when Internet and social media use is omnipresent among patients in their self-directed research about their medical or surgical needs, artificial intelligence (AI) large language models (LLMs) are on track to represent hallmark resources in this context.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The authors aim to explore and assess the performance of a novel AI LLM in answering questions posed by simulated patients interested in aesthetic breast plastic surgery procedures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A publicly available AI LLM was queried using simulated interactions from the perspective of patients interested in breast augmentation, mastopexy, and breast reduction. Questions posed were standardized and categorized under aesthetic needs inquiries and awareness of appropriate procedures; patient candidacy and indications; procedure safety and risks; procedure information, steps, and techniques; patient assessment; preparation for surgery; postprocedure instructions and recovery; and procedure cost and surgeon recommendations. Using standardized Likert scales ranging from 1 to 10, 4 expert breast plastic surgeons evaluated responses provided by AI. A postparticipation survey assessed expert evaluators' experience with LLM technology, perceived utility, and limitations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The overall performance across all question categories, assessment criteria, and procedures examined was 7.3/10 ± 0.5. Overall accuracy of information shared was scored at 7.1/10 ± 0.5; comprehensiveness at 7.0/10 ± 0.6; objectivity at 7.5/10 ± 0.4; safety at 7.5/10 ± 0.4; communication clarity at 7.3/10 ± 0.2; and acknowledgment of limitations at 7.7/10 ± 0.2. With regards to performance on procedures examined, the model's overall score was 7.0/10 ± 0.8 for breast augmentation; 7.6/10 ± 0.5 for mastopexy; and 7.4/10 ± 0.5 for breast reduction. The score on breast implant-specific knowledge was 6.7/10 ± 0.6.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Albeit not without limitations, AI LLMs represent promising resources for patient guidance and patient education. The technology's machine learning capabilities may explain its improved performance efficiency.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence 4: </strong></p>","PeriodicalId":72118,"journal":{"name":"Aesthetic surgery journal. Open forum","volume":"6 ","pages":"ojae062"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11385898/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Preoperative Patient Guidance and Education in Aesthetic Breast Plastic Surgery: A Novel Proposed Application of Artificial Intelligence Large Language Models.\",\"authors\":\"Jad Abi-Rafeh, Brian Bassiri-Tehrani, Roy Kazan, Heather Furnas, Dennis Hammond, William P Adams, Foad Nahai\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/asjof/ojae062\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>At a time when Internet and social media use is omnipresent among patients in their self-directed research about their medical or surgical needs, artificial intelligence (AI) large language models (LLMs) are on track to represent hallmark resources in this context.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The authors aim to explore and assess the performance of a novel AI LLM in answering questions posed by simulated patients interested in aesthetic breast plastic surgery procedures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A publicly available AI LLM was queried using simulated interactions from the perspective of patients interested in breast augmentation, mastopexy, and breast reduction. Questions posed were standardized and categorized under aesthetic needs inquiries and awareness of appropriate procedures; patient candidacy and indications; procedure safety and risks; procedure information, steps, and techniques; patient assessment; preparation for surgery; postprocedure instructions and recovery; and procedure cost and surgeon recommendations. Using standardized Likert scales ranging from 1 to 10, 4 expert breast plastic surgeons evaluated responses provided by AI. A postparticipation survey assessed expert evaluators' experience with LLM technology, perceived utility, and limitations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The overall performance across all question categories, assessment criteria, and procedures examined was 7.3/10 ± 0.5. Overall accuracy of information shared was scored at 7.1/10 ± 0.5; comprehensiveness at 7.0/10 ± 0.6; objectivity at 7.5/10 ± 0.4; safety at 7.5/10 ± 0.4; communication clarity at 7.3/10 ± 0.2; and acknowledgment of limitations at 7.7/10 ± 0.2. With regards to performance on procedures examined, the model's overall score was 7.0/10 ± 0.8 for breast augmentation; 7.6/10 ± 0.5 for mastopexy; and 7.4/10 ± 0.5 for breast reduction. The score on breast implant-specific knowledge was 6.7/10 ± 0.6.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Albeit not without limitations, AI LLMs represent promising resources for patient guidance and patient education. The technology's machine learning capabilities may explain its improved performance efficiency.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence 4: </strong></p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72118,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Aesthetic surgery journal. Open forum\",\"volume\":\"6 \",\"pages\":\"ojae062\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11385898/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Aesthetic surgery journal. Open forum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/asjof/ojae062\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aesthetic surgery journal. Open forum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/asjof/ojae062","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:当互联网和社交媒体的使用在患者自主研究其医疗或手术需求时无处不在,人工智能(AI)大语言模型(LLM)有望成为这一背景下的标志性资源:作者旨在探索和评估新型人工智能 LLM 在回答对乳房美容整形手术感兴趣的模拟患者提出的问题时的表现:方法:从对隆胸术、乳房整形术和乳房缩小术感兴趣的患者的角度出发,使用模拟交互对公开可用的人工智能 LLM 进行查询。所提问题均已标准化,并按审美需求咨询和对适当手术的认识、患者候选资格和适应症、手术安全和风险、手术信息、步骤和技术、患者评估、手术准备、术后指导和恢复、手术费用和外科医生建议等进行了分类。4 位乳房整形外科专家使用 1 到 10 分的标准化李克特量表对人工智能提供的回答进行了评估。参与后的调查评估了专家评估者对 LLM 技术的体验、感知的效用和局限性:结果:所有问题类别、评估标准和检查程序的总体表现为 7.3/10 ± 0.5。共享信息的总体准确性为 7.1/10±0.5;全面性为 7.0/10±0.6;客观性为 7.5/10±0.4;安全性为 7.5/10±0.4;沟通清晰度为 7.3/10±0.2;承认局限性为 7.7/10±0.2。在所检查手术的表现方面,模型的总体得分是:隆胸 7.0/10±0.8;乳房整形 7.6/10±0.5;缩胸 7.4/10±0.5。假体隆胸相关知识的得分是 6.7/10 ± 0.6:尽管人工智能 LLMs 并非没有局限性,但它在患者指导和患者教育方面是很有前途的资源。该技术的机器学习能力可能是其提高效率的原因:
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Preoperative Patient Guidance and Education in Aesthetic Breast Plastic Surgery: A Novel Proposed Application of Artificial Intelligence Large Language Models.

Background: At a time when Internet and social media use is omnipresent among patients in their self-directed research about their medical or surgical needs, artificial intelligence (AI) large language models (LLMs) are on track to represent hallmark resources in this context.

Objectives: The authors aim to explore and assess the performance of a novel AI LLM in answering questions posed by simulated patients interested in aesthetic breast plastic surgery procedures.

Methods: A publicly available AI LLM was queried using simulated interactions from the perspective of patients interested in breast augmentation, mastopexy, and breast reduction. Questions posed were standardized and categorized under aesthetic needs inquiries and awareness of appropriate procedures; patient candidacy and indications; procedure safety and risks; procedure information, steps, and techniques; patient assessment; preparation for surgery; postprocedure instructions and recovery; and procedure cost and surgeon recommendations. Using standardized Likert scales ranging from 1 to 10, 4 expert breast plastic surgeons evaluated responses provided by AI. A postparticipation survey assessed expert evaluators' experience with LLM technology, perceived utility, and limitations.

Results: The overall performance across all question categories, assessment criteria, and procedures examined was 7.3/10 ± 0.5. Overall accuracy of information shared was scored at 7.1/10 ± 0.5; comprehensiveness at 7.0/10 ± 0.6; objectivity at 7.5/10 ± 0.4; safety at 7.5/10 ± 0.4; communication clarity at 7.3/10 ± 0.2; and acknowledgment of limitations at 7.7/10 ± 0.2. With regards to performance on procedures examined, the model's overall score was 7.0/10 ± 0.8 for breast augmentation; 7.6/10 ± 0.5 for mastopexy; and 7.4/10 ± 0.5 for breast reduction. The score on breast implant-specific knowledge was 6.7/10 ± 0.6.

Conclusions: Albeit not without limitations, AI LLMs represent promising resources for patient guidance and patient education. The technology's machine learning capabilities may explain its improved performance efficiency.

Level of evidence 4:

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
4 weeks
期刊最新文献
Correction to: Commentary on: The Role of Nasal Fat Preservation in Upper Lid Surgery and Assessment With the FACE-Q Questionnaire: Innovations in Upper Blepharoplasty. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Autologous vs Irradiated Homologous Costal Cartilage Grafts for Dorsal Augmentation Rhinoplasty. Commentary on: The Gargano Yin Yang Breast Reduction Technique: How to Obtain Better Breast Shape, Volume Distribution, and Size With Long-Lasting Results. Bibliometric Analysis of the Highest Cited Cosmetic Upper Facial Plastic Surgery Articles Over 50 Years. Might Topical Heparin Help With Occlusion Emergencies After Accidental Intra-Arterial Hyaluronic Acid Injections?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1