大型综合癌症中心对耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌鼻拭子筛查的评估。

Mark J Herrington, Chun Feng, Hyunsoo Hwang, Nancy N Vuong
{"title":"大型综合癌症中心对耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌鼻拭子筛查的评估。","authors":"Mark J Herrington, Chun Feng, Hyunsoo Hwang, Nancy N Vuong","doi":"10.1017/ash.2024.370","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study is to determine the predictive values of MRSA swab screenings in patients with cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a retrospective cohort observational study of adult patients admitted to The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center between January 2019 and October 2022. Data collected from patients with documented MRSA nasal swab screenings and clinical cultures taken within 7 days were collected. The first documented MRSA swab screening and culture results from unique patients were included for analysis to calculate sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and NPV.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 6475 patients with MRSA nasal swab cultures had 13129 clinical cultures from different anatomical sites. Of the patients included, 57% had a solid tumor and 37% had a hematological malignancy, with 82% of patients receiving an anti-MRSA antibiotic prior to MRSA nasal swab. There were 167 documented positive MRSA cultures, most commonly from a wound (41.3%) or respiratory source (24%). Overall sensitivity and specificity for all culture sites were 50.9% and 98.4%, respectively, with an overall NPV of 99.4%. The NPV was 99.8% for bloodstream infections, 98.5% for respiratory infections, 92.6% for wound infections, and greater than 99% for other culture sites.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The specificity and negative predictive value of MRSA swab screenings in patients with cancer was high overall and consistent with the literature in immunocompetent patients. These results may aid in antimicrobial stewardship activities that can help guide the discontinuation of empiric antibiotics in patients with cancer.</p>","PeriodicalId":72246,"journal":{"name":"Antimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11406560/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of methicillin-resistant <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> nasal swab screening at a large comprehensive cancer center.\",\"authors\":\"Mark J Herrington, Chun Feng, Hyunsoo Hwang, Nancy N Vuong\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/ash.2024.370\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study is to determine the predictive values of MRSA swab screenings in patients with cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a retrospective cohort observational study of adult patients admitted to The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center between January 2019 and October 2022. Data collected from patients with documented MRSA nasal swab screenings and clinical cultures taken within 7 days were collected. The first documented MRSA swab screening and culture results from unique patients were included for analysis to calculate sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and NPV.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 6475 patients with MRSA nasal swab cultures had 13129 clinical cultures from different anatomical sites. Of the patients included, 57% had a solid tumor and 37% had a hematological malignancy, with 82% of patients receiving an anti-MRSA antibiotic prior to MRSA nasal swab. There were 167 documented positive MRSA cultures, most commonly from a wound (41.3%) or respiratory source (24%). Overall sensitivity and specificity for all culture sites were 50.9% and 98.4%, respectively, with an overall NPV of 99.4%. The NPV was 99.8% for bloodstream infections, 98.5% for respiratory infections, 92.6% for wound infections, and greater than 99% for other culture sites.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The specificity and negative predictive value of MRSA swab screenings in patients with cancer was high overall and consistent with the literature in immunocompetent patients. These results may aid in antimicrobial stewardship activities that can help guide the discontinuation of empiric antibiotics in patients with cancer.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72246,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Antimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11406560/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Antimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/ash.2024.370\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Antimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/ash.2024.370","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究目的本研究旨在确定癌症患者 MRSA 拭子筛查的预测值:这是一项回顾性队列观察研究,研究对象为 2019 年 1 月至 2022 年 10 月期间入住德克萨斯大学 MD 安德森癌症中心的成年患者。研究收集了 7 天内有 MRSA 鼻拭子筛查记录和临床培养的患者数据。分析中纳入了唯一患者的首次有记录的 MRSA 鼻拭子筛查和培养结果,以计算灵敏度、特异性、阳性预测值和 NPV:结果:共有 6475 名患者进行了 MRSA 鼻拭子培养,13129 次临床培养来自不同的解剖部位。在纳入的患者中,57%患有实体瘤,37%患有血液恶性肿瘤,82%的患者在进行MRSA鼻拭子培养前接受了抗MRSA抗生素治疗。记录在案的 MRSA 培养阳性病例有 167 例,最常见的病例来自伤口(41.3%)或呼吸道(24%)。所有培养部位的总体敏感性和特异性分别为 50.9% 和 98.4%,总体 NPV 为 99.4%。血流感染的 NPV 为 99.8%,呼吸道感染为 98.5%,伤口感染为 92.6%,其他培养部位的 NPV 均大于 99%:癌症患者MRSA拭子筛查的特异性和阴性预测值总体较高,与免疫功能正常患者的文献报道一致。这些结果可能有助于开展抗菌药物管理活动,从而指导癌症患者停止使用经验性抗生素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Evaluation of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus nasal swab screening at a large comprehensive cancer center.

Objective: The aim of this study is to determine the predictive values of MRSA swab screenings in patients with cancer.

Methods: This is a retrospective cohort observational study of adult patients admitted to The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center between January 2019 and October 2022. Data collected from patients with documented MRSA nasal swab screenings and clinical cultures taken within 7 days were collected. The first documented MRSA swab screening and culture results from unique patients were included for analysis to calculate sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and NPV.

Results: A total of 6475 patients with MRSA nasal swab cultures had 13129 clinical cultures from different anatomical sites. Of the patients included, 57% had a solid tumor and 37% had a hematological malignancy, with 82% of patients receiving an anti-MRSA antibiotic prior to MRSA nasal swab. There were 167 documented positive MRSA cultures, most commonly from a wound (41.3%) or respiratory source (24%). Overall sensitivity and specificity for all culture sites were 50.9% and 98.4%, respectively, with an overall NPV of 99.4%. The NPV was 99.8% for bloodstream infections, 98.5% for respiratory infections, 92.6% for wound infections, and greater than 99% for other culture sites.

Conclusion: The specificity and negative predictive value of MRSA swab screenings in patients with cancer was high overall and consistent with the literature in immunocompetent patients. These results may aid in antimicrobial stewardship activities that can help guide the discontinuation of empiric antibiotics in patients with cancer.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Effect of automated identification of antimicrobial stewardship opportunities for suspected urinary tract infections. Impacts of risk-stratified inpatient penicillin allergy label delabeling on subsequent antimicrobial spectrum index and costs. Successful adaptation of an initiative to reduce unnecessary antibiotics for acute respiratory infections across two Veteran Affairs ambulatory healthcare systems. Trends in antibiotic utilization for patients hospitalized with COVID-19 with and without signs of sepsis. Assessing a safety climate tool adapted to address respiratory illnesses in Canadian hospitals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1