[日本血管造影术和静脉造影术模型入口表面气孔多中心调查]。

Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai zasshi Pub Date : 2024-10-20 Epub Date: 2024-09-12 DOI:10.6009/jjrt.2024-1483
Ryota Hasegawa, Kazuki Noguchi, Kazuya Takeda, Koushi Sakiyama, Masakazu Sato, Kazuki Maekawa, Toshihiro Hayashi, Osamu Tajima, Hajime Sakamoto, Hisaya Sato, Eiji Ishikawa
{"title":"[日本血管造影术和静脉造影术模型入口表面气孔多中心调查]。","authors":"Ryota Hasegawa, Kazuki Noguchi, Kazuya Takeda, Koushi Sakiyama, Masakazu Sato, Kazuki Maekawa, Toshihiro Hayashi, Osamu Tajima, Hajime Sakamoto, Hisaya Sato, Eiji Ishikawa","doi":"10.6009/jjrt.2024-1483","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>In DRLs 2020, the entrance surface air kerma (Ka,e) was set to 17 mGy/min as the reference dose rate in fluoroscopy. But, Ka,e in fluoroscopy for different regions and Ka,e in exposure was not set. A multicenter survey was conducted to evaluate Ka,e by each area.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Ka,e for each area was analyzed for 79 facilities attending this survey (274 machines and 461 protocols). When the protocols were changed by the difference in disease, angiography, or IVR, the difference rate of Ka,e was evaluated. Ka,e before and after modifying the incident air kerma at the patient entrance reference point (Ka,r) and air kerma area product (P<sub>KA</sub>) difference rate were calculated when protocols were changed, considering the DRLs 2020.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were dose differences in Ka,e by each area. Compared to DRLs 2020, 36 protocols from 13 facilities modified their protocols, all of which reduced Ka,e.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although reducing Ka,e does not necessarily reduce Ka,r, and P<sub>KA</sub>, comparison of Ka,e by each area is expected to optimize medical exposure protection, including evaluation of quality control.</p>","PeriodicalId":74309,"journal":{"name":"Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai zasshi","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Multicenter Survey on Phantom Entrance Surface Air Kerma of Angiography and IVR in Japan].\",\"authors\":\"Ryota Hasegawa, Kazuki Noguchi, Kazuya Takeda, Koushi Sakiyama, Masakazu Sato, Kazuki Maekawa, Toshihiro Hayashi, Osamu Tajima, Hajime Sakamoto, Hisaya Sato, Eiji Ishikawa\",\"doi\":\"10.6009/jjrt.2024-1483\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>In DRLs 2020, the entrance surface air kerma (Ka,e) was set to 17 mGy/min as the reference dose rate in fluoroscopy. But, Ka,e in fluoroscopy for different regions and Ka,e in exposure was not set. A multicenter survey was conducted to evaluate Ka,e by each area.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Ka,e for each area was analyzed for 79 facilities attending this survey (274 machines and 461 protocols). When the protocols were changed by the difference in disease, angiography, or IVR, the difference rate of Ka,e was evaluated. Ka,e before and after modifying the incident air kerma at the patient entrance reference point (Ka,r) and air kerma area product (P<sub>KA</sub>) difference rate were calculated when protocols were changed, considering the DRLs 2020.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were dose differences in Ka,e by each area. Compared to DRLs 2020, 36 protocols from 13 facilities modified their protocols, all of which reduced Ka,e.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although reducing Ka,e does not necessarily reduce Ka,r, and P<sub>KA</sub>, comparison of Ka,e by each area is expected to optimize medical exposure protection, including evaluation of quality control.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74309,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai zasshi\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai zasshi\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.6009/jjrt.2024-1483\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/9/12 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai zasshi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.6009/jjrt.2024-1483","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:在 DRLs 2020 中,入口表面空气开尔马(Ka,e)被设定为 17 mGy/min,作为透视中的参考剂量率。但是,不同区域透视中的 Ka,e 和曝光中的 Ka,e 并没有设定。我们进行了一项多中心调查,以评估各地区的 Ka,e 方法:方法:对参加此次调查的 79 家机构(274 台机器和 461 个方案)的各地区 Ka,e 进行了分析。根据疾病、血管造影或 IVR 的不同而改变方案时,对 Ka,e 的差异率进行评估。考虑到 2020 年的 DRL,计算了修改患者入口参考点入射空气热玛(Ka,r)前后的 Ka,e,以及修改方案时空气热玛面积乘积(PKA)的差异率:结果:各区域的 Ka,e 均存在剂量差异。与 DRLs 2020 相比,13 个设施的 36 个方案修改了其方案,所有方案都降低了 Ka,e :尽管降低 Ka,e 不一定会降低 Ka,r 和 PKA,但对各地区 Ka,e 的比较有望优化医疗照射防护,包括对质量控制的评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[Multicenter Survey on Phantom Entrance Surface Air Kerma of Angiography and IVR in Japan].

Purpose: In DRLs 2020, the entrance surface air kerma (Ka,e) was set to 17 mGy/min as the reference dose rate in fluoroscopy. But, Ka,e in fluoroscopy for different regions and Ka,e in exposure was not set. A multicenter survey was conducted to evaluate Ka,e by each area.

Methods: Ka,e for each area was analyzed for 79 facilities attending this survey (274 machines and 461 protocols). When the protocols were changed by the difference in disease, angiography, or IVR, the difference rate of Ka,e was evaluated. Ka,e before and after modifying the incident air kerma at the patient entrance reference point (Ka,r) and air kerma area product (PKA) difference rate were calculated when protocols were changed, considering the DRLs 2020.

Results: There were dose differences in Ka,e by each area. Compared to DRLs 2020, 36 protocols from 13 facilities modified their protocols, all of which reduced Ka,e.

Conclusion: Although reducing Ka,e does not necessarily reduce Ka,r, and PKA, comparison of Ka,e by each area is expected to optimize medical exposure protection, including evaluation of quality control.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
[Long-term Reproducibility Evaluation of Fluoroscopy Dose Rate in Angiography Equipment]. [Root Cause Analysis for Incident Reporting Cases of Radiological Technologists Based on Years of Experience]. [Effect of Training Data Differences on Accuracy in MR Image Generation Using Pix2pix]. [Noise Characteristics of Summary Maps for Brain CT Perfusion: A Simulation Study Using a Digital Phantom and Clinical Images]. [Effect of Pulse Wave Synchronization on T1 Value in Cardiac T1 Mapping: Is Pulse Wave Synchronization a Substitute for Electrocardiogram Gating?]
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1