引导用于脑输送的纳米载体的神经毒性和安全性评估:评估模型和见解。

Maria Inês Teixeira, Carla M Lopes, Maria Helena Amaral, Paulo C Costa
{"title":"引导用于脑输送的纳米载体的神经毒性和安全性评估:评估模型和见解。","authors":"Maria Inês Teixeira, Carla M Lopes, Maria Helena Amaral, Paulo C Costa","doi":"10.1016/j.actbio.2024.09.027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Nanomedicine, an area which uses nanomaterials for theragnostic purposes, is advancing rapidly, particularly in the detection and treatment of neurodegenerative diseases. The design of nanocarriers can be optimized to enhance drug bioavailability and targeting to specific organs, improving therapeutic outcomes. However, clinical translation hinges on biocompatibility and safety. Nanocarriers can cross the blood-brain barrier (BBB), potentially causing neurotoxic effects through mechanisms such as oxidative stress, DNA damage, and neuroinflammation. Concerns about their accumulation and persistence in the brain make it imperative to carry out a nanotoxicological risk assessment. Generally, this involves identifying exposure sources and routes, characterizing physicochemical properties, and conducting cytotoxicity assays both in vitro and in vivo. The lack of a specialized regulatory framework creates substantial gaps, making it challenging to translate findings across development stages. Additionally, there is a pressing need for innovative testing methods due to constraints on animal use and the demand for high-throughput screening. This review examines the mechanisms of nanocarrier-induced neurotoxicity and the challenges in risk assessment, highlighting the impact of physicochemical properties and the advantages and limitations of current neurotoxicity evaluation models. Future perspectives are also discussed. Additional guidance is crucial to improve the safety of nanomaterials and reduce associated uncertainty. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE: Nanocarriers show tremendous potential for theragnostic purposes in neurological diseases, enhancing drug targeting to the brain, and improving biodistribution and pharmacokinetics. However, their neurotoxicity is still a major field to be explored, with only 5% of nanotechnology-related publications addressing this matter. This review focuses on the issue of neurotoxicity and safety assessment of nanocarriers for brain delivery. Neurotoxicity-relevant exposure sources, routes and molecular mechanisms, along with the impact of the physicochemical properties of nanomaterials, are comprehensively described. Moreover, the different experimental models used for neurotoxicity evaluation are explored at length, including their main advantages and limitations. To conclude, we discuss current challenges and future perspectives for a better understanding of risk assessment of nanocarriers for neurobiomedical applications.</p>","PeriodicalId":93848,"journal":{"name":"Acta biomaterialia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Navigating Neurotoxicity and Safety Assessment of Nanocarriers for Brain Delivery: Evaluation Models and Insights.\",\"authors\":\"Maria Inês Teixeira, Carla M Lopes, Maria Helena Amaral, Paulo C Costa\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.actbio.2024.09.027\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Nanomedicine, an area which uses nanomaterials for theragnostic purposes, is advancing rapidly, particularly in the detection and treatment of neurodegenerative diseases. The design of nanocarriers can be optimized to enhance drug bioavailability and targeting to specific organs, improving therapeutic outcomes. However, clinical translation hinges on biocompatibility and safety. Nanocarriers can cross the blood-brain barrier (BBB), potentially causing neurotoxic effects through mechanisms such as oxidative stress, DNA damage, and neuroinflammation. Concerns about their accumulation and persistence in the brain make it imperative to carry out a nanotoxicological risk assessment. Generally, this involves identifying exposure sources and routes, characterizing physicochemical properties, and conducting cytotoxicity assays both in vitro and in vivo. The lack of a specialized regulatory framework creates substantial gaps, making it challenging to translate findings across development stages. Additionally, there is a pressing need for innovative testing methods due to constraints on animal use and the demand for high-throughput screening. This review examines the mechanisms of nanocarrier-induced neurotoxicity and the challenges in risk assessment, highlighting the impact of physicochemical properties and the advantages and limitations of current neurotoxicity evaluation models. Future perspectives are also discussed. Additional guidance is crucial to improve the safety of nanomaterials and reduce associated uncertainty. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE: Nanocarriers show tremendous potential for theragnostic purposes in neurological diseases, enhancing drug targeting to the brain, and improving biodistribution and pharmacokinetics. However, their neurotoxicity is still a major field to be explored, with only 5% of nanotechnology-related publications addressing this matter. This review focuses on the issue of neurotoxicity and safety assessment of nanocarriers for brain delivery. Neurotoxicity-relevant exposure sources, routes and molecular mechanisms, along with the impact of the physicochemical properties of nanomaterials, are comprehensively described. Moreover, the different experimental models used for neurotoxicity evaluation are explored at length, including their main advantages and limitations. To conclude, we discuss current challenges and future perspectives for a better understanding of risk assessment of nanocarriers for neurobiomedical applications.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93848,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta biomaterialia\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta biomaterialia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2024.09.027\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta biomaterialia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2024.09.027","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

纳米医学是一个将纳米材料用于治疗目的的领域,该领域发展迅速,尤其是在检测和治疗神经退行性疾病方面。通过优化纳米载体的设计,可以提高药物的生物利用度和对特定器官的靶向性,从而改善治疗效果。然而,临床转化取决于生物相容性和安全性。纳米载体可穿过血脑屏障(BBB),可能通过氧化应激、DNA 损伤和神经炎症等机制产生神经毒性效应。由于担心其在大脑中的积累和持久性,必须进行纳米毒理学风险评估。一般来说,这包括确定暴露来源和途径、描述物理化学特性以及进行体外和体内细胞毒性试验。缺乏专门的监管框架造成了巨大的差距,使得在不同开发阶段转化研究结果具有挑战性。此外,由于动物使用的限制和对高通量筛选的需求,迫切需要创新的测试方法。本综述探讨了纳米载体诱导神经毒性的机理以及风险评估所面临的挑战,强调了理化特性的影响以及当前神经毒性评估模型的优势和局限性。此外,还讨论了未来的展望。额外的指导对于提高纳米材料的安全性和减少相关的不确定性至关重要。意义说明:纳米载体在神经系统疾病的治疗、增强药物在大脑中的靶向性、改善生物分布和药代动力学方面显示出巨大的潜力。然而,纳米载体的神经毒性仍是一个有待探索的重要领域,仅有 5% 的纳米技术相关出版物涉及这一问题。本综述重点讨论用于脑部递送的纳米载体的神经毒性和安全性评估问题。全面介绍了与神经毒性相关的接触源、途径和分子机制,以及纳米材料理化特性的影响。此外,还详细探讨了用于神经毒性评估的不同实验模型,包括其主要优点和局限性。最后,我们讨论了当前的挑战和未来的前景,以便更好地了解神经生物医学应用纳米载体的风险评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Navigating Neurotoxicity and Safety Assessment of Nanocarriers for Brain Delivery: Evaluation Models and Insights.

Nanomedicine, an area which uses nanomaterials for theragnostic purposes, is advancing rapidly, particularly in the detection and treatment of neurodegenerative diseases. The design of nanocarriers can be optimized to enhance drug bioavailability and targeting to specific organs, improving therapeutic outcomes. However, clinical translation hinges on biocompatibility and safety. Nanocarriers can cross the blood-brain barrier (BBB), potentially causing neurotoxic effects through mechanisms such as oxidative stress, DNA damage, and neuroinflammation. Concerns about their accumulation and persistence in the brain make it imperative to carry out a nanotoxicological risk assessment. Generally, this involves identifying exposure sources and routes, characterizing physicochemical properties, and conducting cytotoxicity assays both in vitro and in vivo. The lack of a specialized regulatory framework creates substantial gaps, making it challenging to translate findings across development stages. Additionally, there is a pressing need for innovative testing methods due to constraints on animal use and the demand for high-throughput screening. This review examines the mechanisms of nanocarrier-induced neurotoxicity and the challenges in risk assessment, highlighting the impact of physicochemical properties and the advantages and limitations of current neurotoxicity evaluation models. Future perspectives are also discussed. Additional guidance is crucial to improve the safety of nanomaterials and reduce associated uncertainty. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE: Nanocarriers show tremendous potential for theragnostic purposes in neurological diseases, enhancing drug targeting to the brain, and improving biodistribution and pharmacokinetics. However, their neurotoxicity is still a major field to be explored, with only 5% of nanotechnology-related publications addressing this matter. This review focuses on the issue of neurotoxicity and safety assessment of nanocarriers for brain delivery. Neurotoxicity-relevant exposure sources, routes and molecular mechanisms, along with the impact of the physicochemical properties of nanomaterials, are comprehensively described. Moreover, the different experimental models used for neurotoxicity evaluation are explored at length, including their main advantages and limitations. To conclude, we discuss current challenges and future perspectives for a better understanding of risk assessment of nanocarriers for neurobiomedical applications.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Tuning a Bioengineered Hydrogel for Studying Astrocyte Reactivity in Glioblastoma. Versatile Self-Assembled Near-Infrared SERS Nanoprobes For Multidrug-Resistant Bacterial Infection-Specific Surveillance and Therapy. An Optical System for Cellular Mechanostimulation in 3D Hydrogels. Automated model discovery for textile structures: The unique mechanical signature of warp knitted fabrics. Biopolymer Immune Implants co-loaded with TMZ, R848 and IOX1 for Perioperative Therapy of Glioblastoma.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1