立体定向体放射治疗作为近距离放射治疗宫颈癌的替代疗法:范围界定综述。

IF 8.3 2区 材料科学 Q1 MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces Pub Date : 2024-09-18 DOI:10.1016/j.critrevonc.2024.104517
Ana Verena Silvany Sampaio de Miranda , Jessé Lopes da Silva , Diocésio Alves Pinto de Andrade , Larissa Müller Gomes , Marcela Bonalumi dos Santos , Gustavo Viani Arruda , Andreia Cristina de Melo
{"title":"立体定向体放射治疗作为近距离放射治疗宫颈癌的替代疗法:范围界定综述。","authors":"Ana Verena Silvany Sampaio de Miranda ,&nbsp;Jessé Lopes da Silva ,&nbsp;Diocésio Alves Pinto de Andrade ,&nbsp;Larissa Müller Gomes ,&nbsp;Marcela Bonalumi dos Santos ,&nbsp;Gustavo Viani Arruda ,&nbsp;Andreia Cristina de Melo","doi":"10.1016/j.critrevonc.2024.104517","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>This scoping review aims to evaluate the evidence for stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) boost as a potential alternative for brachytherapy (BCT) in treating cervical cancer.</div></div><div><h3>Material and methods</h3><div>A comprehensive literature search was conducted across multiple databases. Studies investigating SBRT boost in cervical cancer patients who were either contraindicated for or refused BCT were included. The review examined SBRT efficacy and safety.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Sixteen studies were included, encompassing prospective (n = 4) and retrospective cohort studies (n = 8), as well as phase I and II trials (n = 4). The most common SBRT boost dose was 25 Gray(Gy)/5 fractions (ranging from 18 to 40 Gy/3–5 fractions). Local control rates at 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year ranged from 86 % to 100 %, 78–92 %, and 81–92 %, respectively. Overall survival (OS) rates at 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year rates ranged from 49 % to 95 %, 50–77 %, and 50–69 %, respectively. Two studies reported a pathological complete response rate of 93 % and 94 % three months after the SBRT boost. Most studies reported low rates of late grade 3 or higher genitourinary (0–14 %) and gastrointestinal (0–26 %) toxicities. The overall incidence of rectovaginal fistulas ranged from 0 % to 13 %.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This scoping review suggests SBRT boost as a promising alternative to selected cervical cancer patients who cannot receive BCT. The results indicate a high local control with acceptable toxicity profiles. However, further research is needed to define optimal SBRT boost parameters, identify patient selection criteria, and address knowledge gaps regarding long-term outcomes and cost-effectiveness.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":5,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":8.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Stereotactic body radiotherapy boost as an alternative to brachytherapy for cervical cancer: A scoping review\",\"authors\":\"Ana Verena Silvany Sampaio de Miranda ,&nbsp;Jessé Lopes da Silva ,&nbsp;Diocésio Alves Pinto de Andrade ,&nbsp;Larissa Müller Gomes ,&nbsp;Marcela Bonalumi dos Santos ,&nbsp;Gustavo Viani Arruda ,&nbsp;Andreia Cristina de Melo\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.critrevonc.2024.104517\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>This scoping review aims to evaluate the evidence for stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) boost as a potential alternative for brachytherapy (BCT) in treating cervical cancer.</div></div><div><h3>Material and methods</h3><div>A comprehensive literature search was conducted across multiple databases. Studies investigating SBRT boost in cervical cancer patients who were either contraindicated for or refused BCT were included. The review examined SBRT efficacy and safety.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Sixteen studies were included, encompassing prospective (n = 4) and retrospective cohort studies (n = 8), as well as phase I and II trials (n = 4). The most common SBRT boost dose was 25 Gray(Gy)/5 fractions (ranging from 18 to 40 Gy/3–5 fractions). Local control rates at 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year ranged from 86 % to 100 %, 78–92 %, and 81–92 %, respectively. Overall survival (OS) rates at 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year rates ranged from 49 % to 95 %, 50–77 %, and 50–69 %, respectively. Two studies reported a pathological complete response rate of 93 % and 94 % three months after the SBRT boost. Most studies reported low rates of late grade 3 or higher genitourinary (0–14 %) and gastrointestinal (0–26 %) toxicities. The overall incidence of rectovaginal fistulas ranged from 0 % to 13 %.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This scoping review suggests SBRT boost as a promising alternative to selected cervical cancer patients who cannot receive BCT. The results indicate a high local control with acceptable toxicity profiles. However, further research is needed to define optimal SBRT boost parameters, identify patient selection criteria, and address knowledge gaps regarding long-term outcomes and cost-effectiveness.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":5,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1040842824002609\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"材料科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1040842824002609","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本综述旨在评估立体定向体放射治疗(SBRT)作为近距离放射治疗(BCT)的潜在替代方法治疗宫颈癌的证据:在多个数据库中进行了全面的文献检索。材料: 在多个数据库中进行了全面的文献检索,纳入了对有BCT禁忌症或拒绝BCT的宫颈癌患者进行SBRT增强治疗的研究。综述考察了SBRT的有效性和安全性:结果:共纳入16项研究,包括前瞻性(4项)和回顾性队列研究(8项),以及I期和II期试验(4项)。最常见的SBRT增强剂量为25 Gray(Gy)/5次(18 - 40Gy/3至5次不等)。1年、3年和5年的局部控制率分别为86%至100%、78%至92%和81%至92%。1年、3年和5年的总生存率(OS)分别为49%至95%、50%至77%和50%至69%。两项研究报告称,SBRT 增效三个月后的病理完全反应率分别为 93% 和 94%。大多数研究报告的晚期3级或以上泌尿生殖系统(0-14%)和胃肠道(0-26%)毒性发生率较低。直肠阴道瘘的总发生率为0-13%:本次范围界定综述表明,对于无法接受 BCT 的特定宫颈癌患者而言,SBRT 增效疗法是一种很有前景的替代疗法。结果表明,SBRT 的局部控制率高,毒性也可接受。然而,还需要进一步的研究来确定最佳的SBRT增强参数,确定患者选择标准,并解决长期疗效和成本效益方面的知识差距。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Stereotactic body radiotherapy boost as an alternative to brachytherapy for cervical cancer: A scoping review

Purpose

This scoping review aims to evaluate the evidence for stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) boost as a potential alternative for brachytherapy (BCT) in treating cervical cancer.

Material and methods

A comprehensive literature search was conducted across multiple databases. Studies investigating SBRT boost in cervical cancer patients who were either contraindicated for or refused BCT were included. The review examined SBRT efficacy and safety.

Results

Sixteen studies were included, encompassing prospective (n = 4) and retrospective cohort studies (n = 8), as well as phase I and II trials (n = 4). The most common SBRT boost dose was 25 Gray(Gy)/5 fractions (ranging from 18 to 40 Gy/3–5 fractions). Local control rates at 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year ranged from 86 % to 100 %, 78–92 %, and 81–92 %, respectively. Overall survival (OS) rates at 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year rates ranged from 49 % to 95 %, 50–77 %, and 50–69 %, respectively. Two studies reported a pathological complete response rate of 93 % and 94 % three months after the SBRT boost. Most studies reported low rates of late grade 3 or higher genitourinary (0–14 %) and gastrointestinal (0–26 %) toxicities. The overall incidence of rectovaginal fistulas ranged from 0 % to 13 %.

Conclusion

This scoping review suggests SBRT boost as a promising alternative to selected cervical cancer patients who cannot receive BCT. The results indicate a high local control with acceptable toxicity profiles. However, further research is needed to define optimal SBRT boost parameters, identify patient selection criteria, and address knowledge gaps regarding long-term outcomes and cost-effectiveness.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces
ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 工程技术-材料科学:综合
CiteScore
16.00
自引率
6.30%
发文量
4978
审稿时长
1.8 months
期刊介绍: ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces is a leading interdisciplinary journal that brings together chemists, engineers, physicists, and biologists to explore the development and utilization of newly-discovered materials and interfacial processes for specific applications. Our journal has experienced remarkable growth since its establishment in 2009, both in terms of the number of articles published and the impact of the research showcased. We are proud to foster a truly global community, with the majority of published articles originating from outside the United States, reflecting the rapid growth of applied research worldwide.
期刊最新文献
Decreased levels of phosphorylated synuclein in plasma are correlated with poststroke cognitive impairment. Small molecule inhibitor DDQ-treated hippocampal neuronal cells show improved neurite outgrowth and synaptic branching. Polyethylene glycol fusion repair of severed sciatic nerves accelerates recovery of nociceptive sensory perceptions in male and female rats of different strains. Reduced mesencephalic astrocyte-derived neurotrophic factor expression by mutant androgen receptor contributes to neurodegeneration in a model of spinal and bulbar muscular atrophy pathology. Enhanced autophagic clearance of amyloid-β via histone deacetylase 6-mediated V-ATPase assembly and lysosomal acidification protects against Alzheimer's disease in vitro and in vivo.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1