Ana Verena Silvany Sampaio de Miranda , Jessé Lopes da Silva , Diocésio Alves Pinto de Andrade , Larissa Müller Gomes , Marcela Bonalumi dos Santos , Gustavo Viani Arruda , Andreia Cristina de Melo
{"title":"立体定向体放射治疗作为近距离放射治疗宫颈癌的替代疗法:范围界定综述。","authors":"Ana Verena Silvany Sampaio de Miranda , Jessé Lopes da Silva , Diocésio Alves Pinto de Andrade , Larissa Müller Gomes , Marcela Bonalumi dos Santos , Gustavo Viani Arruda , Andreia Cristina de Melo","doi":"10.1016/j.critrevonc.2024.104517","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>This scoping review aims to evaluate the evidence for stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) boost as a potential alternative for brachytherapy (BCT) in treating cervical cancer.</div></div><div><h3>Material and methods</h3><div>A comprehensive literature search was conducted across multiple databases. Studies investigating SBRT boost in cervical cancer patients who were either contraindicated for or refused BCT were included. The review examined SBRT efficacy and safety.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Sixteen studies were included, encompassing prospective (n = 4) and retrospective cohort studies (n = 8), as well as phase I and II trials (n = 4). The most common SBRT boost dose was 25 Gray(Gy)/5 fractions (ranging from 18 to 40 Gy/3–5 fractions). Local control rates at 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year ranged from 86 % to 100 %, 78–92 %, and 81–92 %, respectively. Overall survival (OS) rates at 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year rates ranged from 49 % to 95 %, 50–77 %, and 50–69 %, respectively. Two studies reported a pathological complete response rate of 93 % and 94 % three months after the SBRT boost. Most studies reported low rates of late grade 3 or higher genitourinary (0–14 %) and gastrointestinal (0–26 %) toxicities. The overall incidence of rectovaginal fistulas ranged from 0 % to 13 %.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This scoping review suggests SBRT boost as a promising alternative to selected cervical cancer patients who cannot receive BCT. The results indicate a high local control with acceptable toxicity profiles. However, further research is needed to define optimal SBRT boost parameters, identify patient selection criteria, and address knowledge gaps regarding long-term outcomes and cost-effectiveness.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":5,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":8.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Stereotactic body radiotherapy boost as an alternative to brachytherapy for cervical cancer: A scoping review\",\"authors\":\"Ana Verena Silvany Sampaio de Miranda , Jessé Lopes da Silva , Diocésio Alves Pinto de Andrade , Larissa Müller Gomes , Marcela Bonalumi dos Santos , Gustavo Viani Arruda , Andreia Cristina de Melo\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.critrevonc.2024.104517\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>This scoping review aims to evaluate the evidence for stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) boost as a potential alternative for brachytherapy (BCT) in treating cervical cancer.</div></div><div><h3>Material and methods</h3><div>A comprehensive literature search was conducted across multiple databases. Studies investigating SBRT boost in cervical cancer patients who were either contraindicated for or refused BCT were included. The review examined SBRT efficacy and safety.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Sixteen studies were included, encompassing prospective (n = 4) and retrospective cohort studies (n = 8), as well as phase I and II trials (n = 4). The most common SBRT boost dose was 25 Gray(Gy)/5 fractions (ranging from 18 to 40 Gy/3–5 fractions). Local control rates at 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year ranged from 86 % to 100 %, 78–92 %, and 81–92 %, respectively. Overall survival (OS) rates at 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year rates ranged from 49 % to 95 %, 50–77 %, and 50–69 %, respectively. Two studies reported a pathological complete response rate of 93 % and 94 % three months after the SBRT boost. Most studies reported low rates of late grade 3 or higher genitourinary (0–14 %) and gastrointestinal (0–26 %) toxicities. The overall incidence of rectovaginal fistulas ranged from 0 % to 13 %.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This scoping review suggests SBRT boost as a promising alternative to selected cervical cancer patients who cannot receive BCT. The results indicate a high local control with acceptable toxicity profiles. However, further research is needed to define optimal SBRT boost parameters, identify patient selection criteria, and address knowledge gaps regarding long-term outcomes and cost-effectiveness.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":5,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1040842824002609\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"材料科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1040842824002609","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Stereotactic body radiotherapy boost as an alternative to brachytherapy for cervical cancer: A scoping review
Purpose
This scoping review aims to evaluate the evidence for stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) boost as a potential alternative for brachytherapy (BCT) in treating cervical cancer.
Material and methods
A comprehensive literature search was conducted across multiple databases. Studies investigating SBRT boost in cervical cancer patients who were either contraindicated for or refused BCT were included. The review examined SBRT efficacy and safety.
Results
Sixteen studies were included, encompassing prospective (n = 4) and retrospective cohort studies (n = 8), as well as phase I and II trials (n = 4). The most common SBRT boost dose was 25 Gray(Gy)/5 fractions (ranging from 18 to 40 Gy/3–5 fractions). Local control rates at 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year ranged from 86 % to 100 %, 78–92 %, and 81–92 %, respectively. Overall survival (OS) rates at 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year rates ranged from 49 % to 95 %, 50–77 %, and 50–69 %, respectively. Two studies reported a pathological complete response rate of 93 % and 94 % three months after the SBRT boost. Most studies reported low rates of late grade 3 or higher genitourinary (0–14 %) and gastrointestinal (0–26 %) toxicities. The overall incidence of rectovaginal fistulas ranged from 0 % to 13 %.
Conclusion
This scoping review suggests SBRT boost as a promising alternative to selected cervical cancer patients who cannot receive BCT. The results indicate a high local control with acceptable toxicity profiles. However, further research is needed to define optimal SBRT boost parameters, identify patient selection criteria, and address knowledge gaps regarding long-term outcomes and cost-effectiveness.
期刊介绍:
ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces is a leading interdisciplinary journal that brings together chemists, engineers, physicists, and biologists to explore the development and utilization of newly-discovered materials and interfacial processes for specific applications. Our journal has experienced remarkable growth since its establishment in 2009, both in terms of the number of articles published and the impact of the research showcased. We are proud to foster a truly global community, with the majority of published articles originating from outside the United States, reflecting the rapid growth of applied research worldwide.