推进患者设置:放射治疗中无纹身技术的全面综述。

IF 5.5 2区 医学 Q1 HEMATOLOGY Critical reviews in oncology/hematology Pub Date : 2024-09-20 DOI:10.1016/j.critrevonc.2024.104518
Andrea Lastrucci , Livia Marrazzo , Icro Meattini , Gabriele Simontacchi , Yannick Wandael , Cinzia Talamonti , Stefania Pallotta , Renzo Ricci , Lorenzo Livi
{"title":"推进患者设置:放射治疗中无纹身技术的全面综述。","authors":"Andrea Lastrucci ,&nbsp;Livia Marrazzo ,&nbsp;Icro Meattini ,&nbsp;Gabriele Simontacchi ,&nbsp;Yannick Wandael ,&nbsp;Cinzia Talamonti ,&nbsp;Stefania Pallotta ,&nbsp;Renzo Ricci ,&nbsp;Lorenzo Livi","doi":"10.1016/j.critrevonc.2024.104518","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In recent years, alternative methods to dark ink tattoos for patient positioning in radiotherapy have been explored. This review aims to analyse the evidence for alternative strategies to traditional dark tattoos. An electronic search was conducted in PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Web of Sciences and SCOPUS. Twenty-one articles out of 383 titles fulfilled the selection criteria and were included in the review. These studies were categorized into tattoo-less methods (n=14), UV ink tattoos (n=4) and other techniques (n=3). In most of the selected articles (n=13) focusing on tattoo-less treatments, SGRT is used for patient positioning. These three alternative techniques to dark tattoos are used in different anatomical regions and treatment modalities, with breast cancer being the most prevalent. Tattoo-less techniques are a promising alternative to traditional tattoo-based methods for patient positioning. They have the potential to improve the patient experience and represent an area of ongoing innovation and improvement.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11358,"journal":{"name":"Critical reviews in oncology/hematology","volume":"204 ","pages":"Article 104518"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Advancing patient setup: A comprehensive scoping review of tattoo-less techniques in radiation therapy\",\"authors\":\"Andrea Lastrucci ,&nbsp;Livia Marrazzo ,&nbsp;Icro Meattini ,&nbsp;Gabriele Simontacchi ,&nbsp;Yannick Wandael ,&nbsp;Cinzia Talamonti ,&nbsp;Stefania Pallotta ,&nbsp;Renzo Ricci ,&nbsp;Lorenzo Livi\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.critrevonc.2024.104518\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>In recent years, alternative methods to dark ink tattoos for patient positioning in radiotherapy have been explored. This review aims to analyse the evidence for alternative strategies to traditional dark tattoos. An electronic search was conducted in PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Web of Sciences and SCOPUS. Twenty-one articles out of 383 titles fulfilled the selection criteria and were included in the review. These studies were categorized into tattoo-less methods (n=14), UV ink tattoos (n=4) and other techniques (n=3). In most of the selected articles (n=13) focusing on tattoo-less treatments, SGRT is used for patient positioning. These three alternative techniques to dark tattoos are used in different anatomical regions and treatment modalities, with breast cancer being the most prevalent. Tattoo-less techniques are a promising alternative to traditional tattoo-based methods for patient positioning. They have the potential to improve the patient experience and represent an area of ongoing innovation and improvement.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11358,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Critical reviews in oncology/hematology\",\"volume\":\"204 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104518\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Critical reviews in oncology/hematology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1040842824002610\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical reviews in oncology/hematology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1040842824002610","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

近年来,人们一直在探索放射治疗中病人定位的深色墨水纹身替代方法。本综述旨在分析传统深色纹身的替代策略的证据。我们在 PubMed、EMBASE、Cochrane Library、Web of Sciences 和 SCOPUS 中进行了电子检索。在 383 篇文章中,有 21 篇符合选题标准,被纳入综述。这些研究分为无纹身方法(14 篇)、紫外线墨水纹身(4 篇)和其他技术(3 篇)。在大多数关于无纹身治疗的文章(13 篇)中,SGRT 被用于患者定位。这三种替代深色纹身的技术用于不同的解剖区域和治疗方式,其中以乳腺癌最为普遍。在病人定位方面,无纹身技术是传统纹身方法的一种很有前途的替代方法。它们有可能改善患者的就医体验,是一个不断创新和改进的领域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Advancing patient setup: A comprehensive scoping review of tattoo-less techniques in radiation therapy
In recent years, alternative methods to dark ink tattoos for patient positioning in radiotherapy have been explored. This review aims to analyse the evidence for alternative strategies to traditional dark tattoos. An electronic search was conducted in PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Web of Sciences and SCOPUS. Twenty-one articles out of 383 titles fulfilled the selection criteria and were included in the review. These studies were categorized into tattoo-less methods (n=14), UV ink tattoos (n=4) and other techniques (n=3). In most of the selected articles (n=13) focusing on tattoo-less treatments, SGRT is used for patient positioning. These three alternative techniques to dark tattoos are used in different anatomical regions and treatment modalities, with breast cancer being the most prevalent. Tattoo-less techniques are a promising alternative to traditional tattoo-based methods for patient positioning. They have the potential to improve the patient experience and represent an area of ongoing innovation and improvement.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.00
自引率
3.20%
发文量
213
审稿时长
55 days
期刊介绍: Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology publishes scholarly, critical reviews in all fields of oncology and hematology written by experts from around the world. Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology is the Official Journal of the European School of Oncology (ESO) and the International Society of Liquid Biopsy.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Erratum to “Unleashing precision: A review of targeted approaches in pleural mesothelioma” [Crit. Rev. Oncol./Hematol. 203C (2024) 104481] Corrigendum to “The emerging HER2 landscape in Colorectal Cancer: The key to unveil the future treatment algorithm?” [Crit. Rev. Oncol./Hematol. 204 (2024) 104515] Corrigendum to “Navigating the complexity of PI3K/AKT pathway in HER-2 negative breast cancer: Biomarkers and beyond” [Crit. Rev. Oncol./Hematol. 200C (2024) 104404] Corrigendum to “Prevalence of treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) with antibody-drug conjugates in metastatic breast cancer patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis” [Crit. Rev. Oncol./Hematol. 204 (2024) 104527]
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1