匀速长跑时心率变异性与运动处方的相关性:随机交叉试验。

Thomas Gronwald, Leonie Horn, Marcelle Schaffarczyk, Olaf Hoos
{"title":"匀速长跑时心率变异性与运动处方的相关性:随机交叉试验。","authors":"Thomas Gronwald,&nbsp;Leonie Horn,&nbsp;Marcelle Schaffarczyk,&nbsp;Olaf Hoos","doi":"10.1002/ejsc.12175","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The study explores the validity of the nonlinear index alpha 1 of detrended fluctuation analysis (DFAa1) of heart rate (HR) variability for exercise prescription in prolonged constant load running bouts of different intensities. 21 trained endurance athletes (9 w and 12 m) performed a ramp test for ventilatory threshold (vVT1 and vVT2) and DFAa1-based (vDFAa1-1 at 0.75 and vDFAa1-2 at 0.5) running speed detection as well as two 20-min running bouts at vDFAa1-1 and vDFAa1-2 (20-vDFAa1-1 and 20-vDFAa1-2), in which HR, oxygen consumption (VO<sub>2</sub>), respiratory frequency (RF), DFAa1, and blood lactate concentration [La-] were assessed. 20-vDFAa1-2 could not be finished by all participants (finisher group (FG), <i>n</i> = 15 versus exhaustion group (EG), <i>n</i> = 6). Despite similar mean external loads of vDFAa1-1 (10.6 ± 1.9 km/h) and vDFAa1-2 (13.1 ± 2.4 km/h) for all participants compared to vVT1 (10.8 ± 1.7 km/h) and vVT2 (13.2 ± 1.9 km/h), considerable differences were present for 20-vDFAa1-2 in EG (15.2 ± 2.4 km/h). 20-vDFAa1-1 and 20-DFAa1-2 yielded significant differences in FG for HR (76.2 ± 5.7 vs. 86.4 ± 5.9 %HR<sub>PEAK</sub>), VO<sub>2</sub> (62.1 ± 5.0 vs. 77.5 ± 8.6 %VO<sub>2PEAK</sub>), RF (40.6 ± 11.3 vs. 46.1 ± 9.8 bpm), DFA-a1 (0.86 ± 0.23 vs. 0.60 ± 0.15), and [La-] (1.41 ± 0.45 vs. 3.34 ± 2.24 mmol/L). Regarding alterations during 20-vDFAa1-1, all parameters showed small changes for all participants, while during 20-vDFAa1-2 RF and DFAa1 showed substantial alterations in FG (RF: 15.6% and DFAa1: −12.8%) and more pronounced in EG (RF: 20.1% and DFAa1: −35.9%). DFAa1-based exercise prescription from incremental testing could be useful for most participants in prolonged running bouts, at least in the moderate to heavy intensity domain. In addition, an individually different increased risk of overloading may occur in the heavy to severe exercise domains and should be further elucidated in the light of durability and decoupling assessment.</p>","PeriodicalId":93999,"journal":{"name":"European journal of sport science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ejsc.12175","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Correlation properties of heart rate variability for exercise prescription during prolonged running at constant speeds: A randomized cross-over trial\",\"authors\":\"Thomas Gronwald,&nbsp;Leonie Horn,&nbsp;Marcelle Schaffarczyk,&nbsp;Olaf Hoos\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ejsc.12175\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The study explores the validity of the nonlinear index alpha 1 of detrended fluctuation analysis (DFAa1) of heart rate (HR) variability for exercise prescription in prolonged constant load running bouts of different intensities. 21 trained endurance athletes (9 w and 12 m) performed a ramp test for ventilatory threshold (vVT1 and vVT2) and DFAa1-based (vDFAa1-1 at 0.75 and vDFAa1-2 at 0.5) running speed detection as well as two 20-min running bouts at vDFAa1-1 and vDFAa1-2 (20-vDFAa1-1 and 20-vDFAa1-2), in which HR, oxygen consumption (VO<sub>2</sub>), respiratory frequency (RF), DFAa1, and blood lactate concentration [La-] were assessed. 20-vDFAa1-2 could not be finished by all participants (finisher group (FG), <i>n</i> = 15 versus exhaustion group (EG), <i>n</i> = 6). Despite similar mean external loads of vDFAa1-1 (10.6 ± 1.9 km/h) and vDFAa1-2 (13.1 ± 2.4 km/h) for all participants compared to vVT1 (10.8 ± 1.7 km/h) and vVT2 (13.2 ± 1.9 km/h), considerable differences were present for 20-vDFAa1-2 in EG (15.2 ± 2.4 km/h). 20-vDFAa1-1 and 20-DFAa1-2 yielded significant differences in FG for HR (76.2 ± 5.7 vs. 86.4 ± 5.9 %HR<sub>PEAK</sub>), VO<sub>2</sub> (62.1 ± 5.0 vs. 77.5 ± 8.6 %VO<sub>2PEAK</sub>), RF (40.6 ± 11.3 vs. 46.1 ± 9.8 bpm), DFA-a1 (0.86 ± 0.23 vs. 0.60 ± 0.15), and [La-] (1.41 ± 0.45 vs. 3.34 ± 2.24 mmol/L). Regarding alterations during 20-vDFAa1-1, all parameters showed small changes for all participants, while during 20-vDFAa1-2 RF and DFAa1 showed substantial alterations in FG (RF: 15.6% and DFAa1: −12.8%) and more pronounced in EG (RF: 20.1% and DFAa1: −35.9%). DFAa1-based exercise prescription from incremental testing could be useful for most participants in prolonged running bouts, at least in the moderate to heavy intensity domain. In addition, an individually different increased risk of overloading may occur in the heavy to severe exercise domains and should be further elucidated in the light of durability and decoupling assessment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93999,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European journal of sport science\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ejsc.12175\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European journal of sport science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ejsc.12175\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European journal of sport science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ejsc.12175","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究探讨了心率(HR)变异性的去趋势波动分析(DFAa1)的非线性指数α1对不同强度的长时间恒定负荷跑步运动处方的有效性。21 名训练有素的耐力运动员(9 w 和 12 m)进行了通气阈值(vVT1 和 vVT2)和基于 DFAa1 的斜坡测试(vDFAa1-1 为 0.75,vDFAa1-2 为 0.5)的跑步速度检测以及在 vDFAa1-1 和 vDFAa1-2 条件下进行的两次 20 分钟跑步(20-vDFAa1-1 和 20-vDFAa1-2),在这两次跑步中评估了心率、耗氧量(VO2)、呼吸频率(RF)、DFAa1 和血乳酸浓度[La-]。20-vDFAa1-2 并非所有参与者都能完成(完成组(FG),n = 15;力竭组(EG),n = 6)。尽管与 vVT1(10.8±1.7 km/h)和 vVT2(13.2±1.9 km/h)相比,所有参赛者的 vDFAa1-1 和 vDFAa1-2 的平均外部负载(10.6±1.9 km/h)和 vDFAa1-2 (13.1±2.4 km/h)相似,但 20-vDFAa1-2 在 EG(15.2±2.4 km/h)中存在相当大的差异。在 FG 中,20-vDFAa1-1 和 20-DFAa1-2 在心率(76.2 ± 5.7 vs. 86.4 ± 5.9 %HRPEAK)、VO2(62.1 ± 5.0 vs. 77.5 ± 8.6 %VO2PEAK)方面存在显著差异。6 %VO2PEAK)、RF(40.6 ± 11.3 vs. 46.1 ± 9.8 bpm)、DFA-a1(0.86 ± 0.23 vs. 0.60 ± 0.15)和[La-](1.41 ± 0.45 vs. 3.34 ± 2.24 mmol/L)。关于20-vDFAa1-1期间的变化,所有参与者的所有参数都出现了小幅变化,而在20-vDFAa1-2期间,RF和DFAa1在FG(RF:15.6%,DFAa1:-12.8%)方面出现了大幅变化,在EG(RF:20.1%,DFAa1:-35.9%)方面则更为明显。根据增量测试得出的基于 DFAa1 的运动处方对大多数参加长时间跑步的人来说是有用的,至少在中度到重度强度范围内是如此。此外,在大运动量到剧烈运动领域,可能会出现个别不同的超负荷风险增加,这一点应根据耐久性和解耦评估进一步阐明。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Correlation properties of heart rate variability for exercise prescription during prolonged running at constant speeds: A randomized cross-over trial

The study explores the validity of the nonlinear index alpha 1 of detrended fluctuation analysis (DFAa1) of heart rate (HR) variability for exercise prescription in prolonged constant load running bouts of different intensities. 21 trained endurance athletes (9 w and 12 m) performed a ramp test for ventilatory threshold (vVT1 and vVT2) and DFAa1-based (vDFAa1-1 at 0.75 and vDFAa1-2 at 0.5) running speed detection as well as two 20-min running bouts at vDFAa1-1 and vDFAa1-2 (20-vDFAa1-1 and 20-vDFAa1-2), in which HR, oxygen consumption (VO2), respiratory frequency (RF), DFAa1, and blood lactate concentration [La-] were assessed. 20-vDFAa1-2 could not be finished by all participants (finisher group (FG), n = 15 versus exhaustion group (EG), n = 6). Despite similar mean external loads of vDFAa1-1 (10.6 ± 1.9 km/h) and vDFAa1-2 (13.1 ± 2.4 km/h) for all participants compared to vVT1 (10.8 ± 1.7 km/h) and vVT2 (13.2 ± 1.9 km/h), considerable differences were present for 20-vDFAa1-2 in EG (15.2 ± 2.4 km/h). 20-vDFAa1-1 and 20-DFAa1-2 yielded significant differences in FG for HR (76.2 ± 5.7 vs. 86.4 ± 5.9 %HRPEAK), VO2 (62.1 ± 5.0 vs. 77.5 ± 8.6 %VO2PEAK), RF (40.6 ± 11.3 vs. 46.1 ± 9.8 bpm), DFA-a1 (0.86 ± 0.23 vs. 0.60 ± 0.15), and [La-] (1.41 ± 0.45 vs. 3.34 ± 2.24 mmol/L). Regarding alterations during 20-vDFAa1-1, all parameters showed small changes for all participants, while during 20-vDFAa1-2 RF and DFAa1 showed substantial alterations in FG (RF: 15.6% and DFAa1: −12.8%) and more pronounced in EG (RF: 20.1% and DFAa1: −35.9%). DFAa1-based exercise prescription from incremental testing could be useful for most participants in prolonged running bouts, at least in the moderate to heavy intensity domain. In addition, an individually different increased risk of overloading may occur in the heavy to severe exercise domains and should be further elucidated in the light of durability and decoupling assessment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Women's rugby as a catalyst for advancing female-specific science and safety in sport. Case study of a world hour record simulation in an elite cyclist: Insight into task failure. Psychological and social factors associated with mental health of European dual career athletes: A systematic review. The effectiveness of cryostimulation exposure on sleep and recovery in male athletes: Timing considerations. The effects of plyometric versus resistance training on running economy and 5-km running time in middle-aged recreational runners.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1