使用 Farrington 算法及早发现和预测非致命性药物相关事件和致命性用药过量爆发。

IF 5.2 1区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY Addiction Pub Date : 2024-09-23 DOI:10.1111/add.16674
Thomas Patton, Sharon Trillo-Park, Bethan Swift, Annick Bórquez
{"title":"使用 Farrington 算法及早发现和预测非致命性药物相关事件和致命性用药过量爆发。","authors":"Thomas Patton, Sharon Trillo-Park, Bethan Swift, Annick Bórquez","doi":"10.1111/add.16674","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>The aim of this study was to assess the validity of undertaking time-series analyses on both fatal and non-fatal drug overdose outcomes for the surveillance of emerging drug threats, and to determine the validity of analyzing non-fatal indicators to support the early detection of fatal overdose outbreaks.</p><p><strong>Design, setting and participants: </strong>Time-series analyses using county-level data containing fatal overdoses and non-fatal overdose counts were collected at monthly intervals between 2015 and 2021 in California and Florida, USA. To analyze these data, we used the Farrington algorithm (FA), a method used to detect aberrations in time-series data such that an abnormal increase in counts relative to previous observations would result in an alert. The FA's performance was compared with a bench-mark approach, using the standard deviation as an aberration detection threshold. We evaluated whether monthly alerts in non-fatal overdose can aid in identifying fatal drug overdose outbreaks, defined as a statistically significant increase in the 6-month overdose death rate. We also conducted analyses across regions, i.e. clusters of counties.</p><p><strong>Measurements: </strong>Measurements were taken during emergency department and emergency medical service visits.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Both methods yielded a similar proportion of alerts across scenarios for non-fatal overdoses, while the bench-mark method yielded more alerts for fatal overdoses. For both methods, the correlations between surveillance evaluations were relatively poor in the detection of aberrations (typically < 35%) but were high between evaluations yielding no alerts (typically > 75%). For ongoing fatal overdose outbreaks, a strategy based on the detection of alerts at the county level from either method yielded a sensitivity of 66% for both California and Florida. At the regional level, the equivalent analyses had sensitivities of 81% for California and 77% for Florida.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Aberration detection methods can support the early detection of fatal drug overdose outbreaks, particularly when methodologies are applied in combination rather than individual methods separately.</p>","PeriodicalId":109,"journal":{"name":"Addiction","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Early detection and prediction of non-fatal drug-related incidents and fatal overdose outbreaks using the Farrington algorithm.\",\"authors\":\"Thomas Patton, Sharon Trillo-Park, Bethan Swift, Annick Bórquez\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/add.16674\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>The aim of this study was to assess the validity of undertaking time-series analyses on both fatal and non-fatal drug overdose outcomes for the surveillance of emerging drug threats, and to determine the validity of analyzing non-fatal indicators to support the early detection of fatal overdose outbreaks.</p><p><strong>Design, setting and participants: </strong>Time-series analyses using county-level data containing fatal overdoses and non-fatal overdose counts were collected at monthly intervals between 2015 and 2021 in California and Florida, USA. To analyze these data, we used the Farrington algorithm (FA), a method used to detect aberrations in time-series data such that an abnormal increase in counts relative to previous observations would result in an alert. The FA's performance was compared with a bench-mark approach, using the standard deviation as an aberration detection threshold. We evaluated whether monthly alerts in non-fatal overdose can aid in identifying fatal drug overdose outbreaks, defined as a statistically significant increase in the 6-month overdose death rate. We also conducted analyses across regions, i.e. clusters of counties.</p><p><strong>Measurements: </strong>Measurements were taken during emergency department and emergency medical service visits.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Both methods yielded a similar proportion of alerts across scenarios for non-fatal overdoses, while the bench-mark method yielded more alerts for fatal overdoses. For both methods, the correlations between surveillance evaluations were relatively poor in the detection of aberrations (typically < 35%) but were high between evaluations yielding no alerts (typically > 75%). For ongoing fatal overdose outbreaks, a strategy based on the detection of alerts at the county level from either method yielded a sensitivity of 66% for both California and Florida. At the regional level, the equivalent analyses had sensitivities of 81% for California and 77% for Florida.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Aberration detection methods can support the early detection of fatal drug overdose outbreaks, particularly when methodologies are applied in combination rather than individual methods separately.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":109,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Addiction\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Addiction\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/add.16674\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Addiction","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/add.16674","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在评估对致命和非致命吸毒过量结果进行时间序列分析以监测新出现的毒品威胁的有效性,并确定分析非致命指标以支持早期发现致命吸毒过量爆发的有效性:时间序列分析使用的是美国加利福尼亚州和佛罗里达州在 2015 年至 2021 年期间每月收集的县级数据,其中包含致命药物过量和非致命药物过量计数。为了分析这些数据,我们使用了法林顿算法(Farrington algorithm,FA),该方法用于检测时间序列数据中的畸变,即计数相对于以前观测值的异常增加会导致警报。我们将 Farrington 算法的性能与使用标准偏差作为畸变检测阈值的基准方法进行了比较。我们评估了非致命性用药过量的月度警报是否有助于识别致命性用药过量爆发,致命性用药过量爆发的定义是 6 个月内用药过量死亡率在统计上的显著增加。我们还进行了跨地区(即县群)分析:测量:在急诊科和急诊室就诊时进行测量:两种方法在不同情况下对非致命性过量用药发出警报的比例相似,而基准方法对致命性过量用药发出警报的比例更高。对于这两种方法,监测评估之间的相关性在发现异常方面相对较差(通常为 75%)。对于正在发生的致命性用药过量疫情,在加利福尼亚州和佛罗里达州,基于两种方法中任何一种方法的县级警报检测策略的灵敏度均为 66%。在地区层面,加州和佛罗里达州的同等分析灵敏度分别为 81% 和 77%:畸变检测方法有助于及早发现致命性吸毒过量疫情,尤其是在将各种方法结合使用而不是单独使用时。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Early detection and prediction of non-fatal drug-related incidents and fatal overdose outbreaks using the Farrington algorithm.

Aims: The aim of this study was to assess the validity of undertaking time-series analyses on both fatal and non-fatal drug overdose outcomes for the surveillance of emerging drug threats, and to determine the validity of analyzing non-fatal indicators to support the early detection of fatal overdose outbreaks.

Design, setting and participants: Time-series analyses using county-level data containing fatal overdoses and non-fatal overdose counts were collected at monthly intervals between 2015 and 2021 in California and Florida, USA. To analyze these data, we used the Farrington algorithm (FA), a method used to detect aberrations in time-series data such that an abnormal increase in counts relative to previous observations would result in an alert. The FA's performance was compared with a bench-mark approach, using the standard deviation as an aberration detection threshold. We evaluated whether monthly alerts in non-fatal overdose can aid in identifying fatal drug overdose outbreaks, defined as a statistically significant increase in the 6-month overdose death rate. We also conducted analyses across regions, i.e. clusters of counties.

Measurements: Measurements were taken during emergency department and emergency medical service visits.

Findings: Both methods yielded a similar proportion of alerts across scenarios for non-fatal overdoses, while the bench-mark method yielded more alerts for fatal overdoses. For both methods, the correlations between surveillance evaluations were relatively poor in the detection of aberrations (typically < 35%) but were high between evaluations yielding no alerts (typically > 75%). For ongoing fatal overdose outbreaks, a strategy based on the detection of alerts at the county level from either method yielded a sensitivity of 66% for both California and Florida. At the regional level, the equivalent analyses had sensitivities of 81% for California and 77% for Florida.

Conclusion: Aberration detection methods can support the early detection of fatal drug overdose outbreaks, particularly when methodologies are applied in combination rather than individual methods separately.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Addiction
Addiction 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
10.80
自引率
6.70%
发文量
319
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Addiction publishes peer-reviewed research reports on pharmacological and behavioural addictions, bringing together research conducted within many different disciplines. Its goal is to serve international and interdisciplinary scientific and clinical communication, to strengthen links between science and policy, and to stimulate and enhance the quality of debate. We seek submissions that are not only technically competent but are also original and contain information or ideas of fresh interest to our international readership. We seek to serve low- and middle-income (LAMI) countries as well as more economically developed countries. Addiction’s scope spans human experimental, epidemiological, social science, historical, clinical and policy research relating to addiction, primarily but not exclusively in the areas of psychoactive substance use and/or gambling. In addition to original research, the journal features editorials, commentaries, reviews, letters, and book reviews.
期刊最新文献
Effect of a peer-led emergency department behavioral intervention on non-fatal opioid overdose: 18-month outcome in the Navigator randomized controlled trial. Client preferences for the design and delivery of injectable opioid agonist treatment services: Results from a best-worst scaling task. School-based interventions targeting substance use among young people in low-and-middle-income countries: A scoping review. The relationship between cannabis and nicotine use: A systematic review and meta-analysis. What is the prevalence of anabolic-androgenic steroid use among women? A systematic review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1