从医院到家庭:应用共同设计方法确定支持中风后过渡到家庭的干预措施的关键组成部分。

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Health Expectations Pub Date : 2024-09-24 DOI:10.1111/hex.70040
Geraldine O'Callaghan, Martin Fahy, Patricia Hall, Deirdre McCartan, Peter Langhorne, Rose Galvin, Frances Horgan
{"title":"从医院到家庭:应用共同设计方法确定支持中风后过渡到家庭的干预措施的关键组成部分。","authors":"Geraldine O'Callaghan,&nbsp;Martin Fahy,&nbsp;Patricia Hall,&nbsp;Deirdre McCartan,&nbsp;Peter Langhorne,&nbsp;Rose Galvin,&nbsp;Frances Horgan","doi":"10.1111/hex.70040","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>People with stroke and their families face numerous challenges as they leave hospital to return home, often experiencing multifaceted unmet needs and feelings of abandonment. The essential elements of an intervention intended to support transition-to-home after stroke are unclear.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>The aim of the project was to engage in a co-design process to identify the key components of a pragmatic intervention to inform a transition-to-home support pathway following stroke.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Materials and Methods</h3>\n \n <p>The study was conducted using a co-design process engaging multiple stakeholders, including 12 people with stroke, 6 caregivers, 26 healthcare professionals and 6 individuals from stroke organisations in a series of three workshops, facilitated by the primary researcher, a wider team of researchers and an individual with lived experience of stroke. World Café methodology and Liberating Structures facilitation techniques were adapted to meet the aim of the workshops. Data collection involved observations during workshops, followed by summarising of findings and reaching group consensus agreement on outputs. Facilitated consensus on a prioritisation task resulted in the final output.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The co-design group identified 10 key intervention components of a transition-to-home support pathway following stroke. These components focussed on enhancing collaboration, streamlining transition processes and facilitating post-discharge support. While a stroke coordinator was considered a top priority, increased cross-setting information sharing and community in-reach, where community-based healthcare staff extended their services into hospital settings to provide continuity care, were considered most feasible to implement.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>The co-design approach, involving a multi-stakeholder group and strengthened by patient and public involvement, ensured that the identified transition-to-home intervention components are meaningful and relevant for people with stroke and their families. Further co-design workshops are required to refine, and feasibility test the components for generalisability within the wider Irish healthcare setting.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Patient or Public Contribution</h3>\n \n <p>Individuals who have experienced a stroke actively contributed to shaping the methodological design of this study and the ethics process. They engaged in the analysis of co-design outputs and provided input for the discussion and recommendations regarding future research. An individual who had experienced a stroke formed part of the research team, co-facilitating the co-design workshops and co-authoring this article.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":55070,"journal":{"name":"Health Expectations","volume":"27 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/hex.70040","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"From Hospital to Home: Applying a Co-Design Approach to Determine the Key Components of an Intervention to Support Transition-To-Home After Stroke\",\"authors\":\"Geraldine O'Callaghan,&nbsp;Martin Fahy,&nbsp;Patricia Hall,&nbsp;Deirdre McCartan,&nbsp;Peter Langhorne,&nbsp;Rose Galvin,&nbsp;Frances Horgan\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/hex.70040\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>People with stroke and their families face numerous challenges as they leave hospital to return home, often experiencing multifaceted unmet needs and feelings of abandonment. The essential elements of an intervention intended to support transition-to-home after stroke are unclear.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objective</h3>\\n \\n <p>The aim of the project was to engage in a co-design process to identify the key components of a pragmatic intervention to inform a transition-to-home support pathway following stroke.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Materials and Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>The study was conducted using a co-design process engaging multiple stakeholders, including 12 people with stroke, 6 caregivers, 26 healthcare professionals and 6 individuals from stroke organisations in a series of three workshops, facilitated by the primary researcher, a wider team of researchers and an individual with lived experience of stroke. World Café methodology and Liberating Structures facilitation techniques were adapted to meet the aim of the workshops. Data collection involved observations during workshops, followed by summarising of findings and reaching group consensus agreement on outputs. Facilitated consensus on a prioritisation task resulted in the final output.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>The co-design group identified 10 key intervention components of a transition-to-home support pathway following stroke. These components focussed on enhancing collaboration, streamlining transition processes and facilitating post-discharge support. While a stroke coordinator was considered a top priority, increased cross-setting information sharing and community in-reach, where community-based healthcare staff extended their services into hospital settings to provide continuity care, were considered most feasible to implement.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>The co-design approach, involving a multi-stakeholder group and strengthened by patient and public involvement, ensured that the identified transition-to-home intervention components are meaningful and relevant for people with stroke and their families. Further co-design workshops are required to refine, and feasibility test the components for generalisability within the wider Irish healthcare setting.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Patient or Public Contribution</h3>\\n \\n <p>Individuals who have experienced a stroke actively contributed to shaping the methodological design of this study and the ethics process. They engaged in the analysis of co-design outputs and provided input for the discussion and recommendations regarding future research. An individual who had experienced a stroke formed part of the research team, co-facilitating the co-design workshops and co-authoring this article.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55070,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health Expectations\",\"volume\":\"27 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/hex.70040\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health Expectations\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/hex.70040\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Expectations","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/hex.70040","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:脑卒中患者及其家人在离开医院返回家中时面临着许多挑战,往往会有多方面的需求得不到满足,并有被遗弃的感觉。旨在支持中风后过渡到居家生活的干预措施的基本要素尚不明确:该项目的目的是参与共同设计过程,确定实用干预措施的关键要素,为中风后过渡到居家支持路径提供信息:该研究采用共同设计流程,由多方利益相关者参与,包括 12 名中风患者、6 名护理人员、26 名医疗保健专业人员和 6 名中风组织的人员,在主要研究人员、更广泛的研究人员团队和一名有中风生活经验的人员的协助下,开展了三个系列研讨会。世界咖啡馆 "方法和 "解放结构 "促进技术经过调整,以达到研讨会的目的。数据收集包括在研讨会期间进行观察,然后总结发现并就成果达成小组共识。在促进下,就优先任务达成共识,形成最终成果:共同设计小组确定了中风后过渡到居家支持路径的 10 个关键干预要素。结果:共同设计小组确定了脑卒中后过渡到居家支持路径的 10 个关键干预要素,这些要素的重点是加强合作、简化过渡流程和促进出院后支持。虽然中风协调员被认为是重中之重,但加强跨设置信息共享和社区内联(即社区医疗人员将其服务延伸到医院环境中以提供连续性护理)被认为是最可行的实施方法:共同设计方法涉及多方利益相关者小组,并通过患者和公众的参与得到加强,确保所确定的过渡到居家干预措施对中风患者及其家属有意义且相关。还需要进一步的共同设计研讨会来完善这些内容,并对其在更广泛的爱尔兰医疗环境中的通用性进行可行性测试:患者或公众的贡献:经历过中风的个人对本研究的方法设计和伦理过程做出了积极贡献。他们参与了共同设计成果的分析,并为有关未来研究的讨论和建议提供了意见。一名中风患者组成了研究小组,共同主持了共同设计工作坊,并与他人共同撰写了本文。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
From Hospital to Home: Applying a Co-Design Approach to Determine the Key Components of an Intervention to Support Transition-To-Home After Stroke

Background

People with stroke and their families face numerous challenges as they leave hospital to return home, often experiencing multifaceted unmet needs and feelings of abandonment. The essential elements of an intervention intended to support transition-to-home after stroke are unclear.

Objective

The aim of the project was to engage in a co-design process to identify the key components of a pragmatic intervention to inform a transition-to-home support pathway following stroke.

Materials and Methods

The study was conducted using a co-design process engaging multiple stakeholders, including 12 people with stroke, 6 caregivers, 26 healthcare professionals and 6 individuals from stroke organisations in a series of three workshops, facilitated by the primary researcher, a wider team of researchers and an individual with lived experience of stroke. World Café methodology and Liberating Structures facilitation techniques were adapted to meet the aim of the workshops. Data collection involved observations during workshops, followed by summarising of findings and reaching group consensus agreement on outputs. Facilitated consensus on a prioritisation task resulted in the final output.

Results

The co-design group identified 10 key intervention components of a transition-to-home support pathway following stroke. These components focussed on enhancing collaboration, streamlining transition processes and facilitating post-discharge support. While a stroke coordinator was considered a top priority, increased cross-setting information sharing and community in-reach, where community-based healthcare staff extended their services into hospital settings to provide continuity care, were considered most feasible to implement.

Conclusion

The co-design approach, involving a multi-stakeholder group and strengthened by patient and public involvement, ensured that the identified transition-to-home intervention components are meaningful and relevant for people with stroke and their families. Further co-design workshops are required to refine, and feasibility test the components for generalisability within the wider Irish healthcare setting.

Patient or Public Contribution

Individuals who have experienced a stroke actively contributed to shaping the methodological design of this study and the ethics process. They engaged in the analysis of co-design outputs and provided input for the discussion and recommendations regarding future research. An individual who had experienced a stroke formed part of the research team, co-facilitating the co-design workshops and co-authoring this article.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Health Expectations
Health Expectations 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
9.40%
发文量
251
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Health Expectations promotes critical thinking and informed debate about all aspects of patient and public involvement and engagement (PPIE) in health and social care, health policy and health services research including: • Person-centred care and quality improvement • Patients'' participation in decisions about disease prevention and management • Public perceptions of health services • Citizen involvement in health care policy making and priority-setting • Methods for monitoring and evaluating participation • Empowerment and consumerism • Patients'' role in safety and quality • Patient and public role in health services research • Co-production (researchers working with patients and the public) of research, health care and policy Health Expectations is a quarterly, peer-reviewed journal publishing original research, review articles and critical commentaries. It includes papers which clarify concepts, develop theories, and critically analyse and evaluate specific policies and practices. The Journal provides an inter-disciplinary and international forum in which researchers (including PPIE researchers) from a range of backgrounds and expertise can present their work to other researchers, policy-makers, health care professionals, managers, patients and consumer advocates.
期刊最新文献
Exploring Barriers and Facilitators to Patients and Members of the Public Contributing to Rapid Health Technology Assessments for NICE: A Qualitative Study. 'The Letter Says I May or May Not Be Eligible… It Is a Big Doubt and Frustrating:' A Qualitative Study on Barriers and Facilitators to Children's Oral Healthcare From the Perspective of Karen Refugee Parents in Victoria. Beyond the Queue: Exploring Waiting Practices in the Stories of Patients With Breast Cancer Consumer Involvement in the Design and Development of Medication Safety Interventions or Services in Primary Care: A Scoping Review Shared Decision-Making and Body Mass Index in Australian Antenatal Care: An Exploratory OPTION12 Evaluation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1