"亚马逊草原化 "一词强化了对 Cerrado 的忽视

IF 4 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION Perspectives in Ecology and Conservation Pub Date : 2024-07-01 DOI:10.1016/j.pecon.2024.07.002
Leila Teruko Shirai , Anya Palm Courtenay , Magnus Agerström , André Victor Lucci Freitas , Fabricio Beggiato Baccaro , Rafaela Jorge Trad
{"title":"\"亚马逊草原化 \"一词强化了对 Cerrado 的忽视","authors":"Leila Teruko Shirai ,&nbsp;Anya Palm Courtenay ,&nbsp;Magnus Agerström ,&nbsp;André Victor Lucci Freitas ,&nbsp;Fabricio Beggiato Baccaro ,&nbsp;Rafaela Jorge Trad","doi":"10.1016/j.pecon.2024.07.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Words and terms evoke responses in us, independently of their original meaning. Precise language matters because terminology can affect conservation. For example, current deforestation rates put the Amazon in the spotlight of global conservation, particularly after the “savannization of the Amazon” was proposed. This term associates cleared or degraded forests with savannas, reinforcing prejudices against natural savannas. The Cerrado is the world’s largest and richest savanna, but receives less conservation attention and resources. Firstly, we showed a multisector Cerrado neglect: number of protected areas, non-governmental organizations, academic human resources, and companies were larger in the Amazon, but deforested area was proportionally smaller. Secondly, we analyzed the academic use of “savannization of the Amazon.” In all 481 studies using this term, human action was implied, and most meant that degraded Amazon does not become old-growth savanna. We propose abandoning the use of “savannization of the Amazon”, promoting the support and attention the Cerrado needs.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":56034,"journal":{"name":"Perspectives in Ecology and Conservation","volume":"22 3","pages":"Pages 219-223"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2530064424000361/pdfft?md5=753ccb45576479c82b5f9c8bc17e18d9&pid=1-s2.0-S2530064424000361-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"“Savannization of the Amazon” is a term that reinforces the Cerrado neglect\",\"authors\":\"Leila Teruko Shirai ,&nbsp;Anya Palm Courtenay ,&nbsp;Magnus Agerström ,&nbsp;André Victor Lucci Freitas ,&nbsp;Fabricio Beggiato Baccaro ,&nbsp;Rafaela Jorge Trad\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.pecon.2024.07.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Words and terms evoke responses in us, independently of their original meaning. Precise language matters because terminology can affect conservation. For example, current deforestation rates put the Amazon in the spotlight of global conservation, particularly after the “savannization of the Amazon” was proposed. This term associates cleared or degraded forests with savannas, reinforcing prejudices against natural savannas. The Cerrado is the world’s largest and richest savanna, but receives less conservation attention and resources. Firstly, we showed a multisector Cerrado neglect: number of protected areas, non-governmental organizations, academic human resources, and companies were larger in the Amazon, but deforested area was proportionally smaller. Secondly, we analyzed the academic use of “savannization of the Amazon.” In all 481 studies using this term, human action was implied, and most meant that degraded Amazon does not become old-growth savanna. We propose abandoning the use of “savannization of the Amazon”, promoting the support and attention the Cerrado needs.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56034,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Perspectives in Ecology and Conservation\",\"volume\":\"22 3\",\"pages\":\"Pages 219-223\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2530064424000361/pdfft?md5=753ccb45576479c82b5f9c8bc17e18d9&pid=1-s2.0-S2530064424000361-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Perspectives in Ecology and Conservation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2530064424000361\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Perspectives in Ecology and Conservation","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2530064424000361","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

词语和术语会唤起我们的反应,而与其原始含义无关。准确的语言很重要,因为术语会影响保护工作。例如,当前的森林砍伐率使亚马逊成为全球保护的焦点,特别是在 "亚马逊热带草原化 "被提出之后。这一术语将开垦或退化的森林与热带稀树草原联系在一起,加深了人们对天然热带稀树草原的偏见。塞拉多(Cerrado)是世界上面积最大、资源最丰富的热带稀树草原,但其受到的保护关注和资源却较少。首先,我们展示了多部门对瑟拉多的忽视:保护区、非政府组织、学术人力资源和公司的数量在亚马逊地区较多,但毁林面积却成比例地较小。其次,我们分析了学术界对 "亚马逊热带草原化 "的使用。在所有 481 项使用该术语的研究中,都暗示了人类的行为,大多数研究的意思是退化的亚马逊不会变成古老的热带稀树草原。我们建议放弃使用 "亚马逊热带稀树草原化",促进对 Cerrado 的支持和关注。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“Savannization of the Amazon” is a term that reinforces the Cerrado neglect
Words and terms evoke responses in us, independently of their original meaning. Precise language matters because terminology can affect conservation. For example, current deforestation rates put the Amazon in the spotlight of global conservation, particularly after the “savannization of the Amazon” was proposed. This term associates cleared or degraded forests with savannas, reinforcing prejudices against natural savannas. The Cerrado is the world’s largest and richest savanna, but receives less conservation attention and resources. Firstly, we showed a multisector Cerrado neglect: number of protected areas, non-governmental organizations, academic human resources, and companies were larger in the Amazon, but deforested area was proportionally smaller. Secondly, we analyzed the academic use of “savannization of the Amazon.” In all 481 studies using this term, human action was implied, and most meant that degraded Amazon does not become old-growth savanna. We propose abandoning the use of “savannization of the Amazon”, promoting the support and attention the Cerrado needs.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Perspectives in Ecology and Conservation
Perspectives in Ecology and Conservation Environmental Science-Nature and Landscape Conservation
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
4.30%
发文量
46
审稿时长
59 days
期刊介绍: Perspectives in Ecology and Conservation (PECON) is a scientific journal devoted to improving theoretical and conceptual aspects of conservation science. It has the main purpose of communicating new research and advances to different actors of society, including researchers, conservationists, practitioners, and policymakers. Perspectives in Ecology and Conservation publishes original papers on biodiversity conservation and restoration, on the main drivers affecting native ecosystems, and on nature’s benefits to people and human wellbeing. This scope includes studies on biodiversity patterns, the effects of habitat loss, fragmentation, biological invasion and climate change on biodiversity, conservation genetics, spatial conservation planning, ecosystem management, ecosystem services, sustainability and resilience of socio-ecological systems, conservation policy, among others.
期刊最新文献
Declining representation of imperiled Atlantic Forest birds in community-science datasets Climate influence on future suitability of high-altitude wetlands in two natural protected areas from the Central Andes of Argentina Is banning Persistent Organic Pollutants efficient? A quantitative and qualitative systematic review in bats Identifying priority conservation areas for the Andean Condor in Colombia Past references are insufficient for Latin American biodiversity conservation in the Anthropocene
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1