新生儿插管培训方法:范围审查

IF 2.1 Q3 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Resuscitation plus Pub Date : 2024-09-23 DOI:10.1016/j.resplu.2024.100776
Jasmine Antoine , Brian Dunn , Mia McLanders , Luke Jardine , Helen Liley
{"title":"新生儿插管培训方法:范围审查","authors":"Jasmine Antoine ,&nbsp;Brian Dunn ,&nbsp;Mia McLanders ,&nbsp;Luke Jardine ,&nbsp;Helen Liley","doi":"10.1016/j.resplu.2024.100776","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Neonatal intubation is a lifesaving skill that a variety of clinicians need to establish as it can be required anywhere babies are born or hospitalised and cannot depend on the immediate availability of an experienced senior clinician. However, neonatal intubation is complex and risky, requiring technical and non-technical skill competence. Studies report that rates of successful neonatal intubation by junior clinicians are low, providing a mandate to examine the best methods to improve skill acquisition, retention, and transfer.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>We utilised PRISMA-ScR methodology to capture the range of training approaches in the simulation and clinical settings, and to assess the range of technical and non-technical skill outcome measures that were used in the included studies. Databases were searched from inception to August 2024 to identify studies reporting outcomes for medical practitioners-in-training, nurses, and nurse practitioners. Identified studies meeting inclusion criteria underwent data charting with study characteristics tabulated.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Twenty-six studies (involving 1449 participants) were included. Training methodology was diverse and included self-directed learning, didactic education, demonstration, simulation-based training (SBT), instructor feedback, debriefing and supervised clinical practice. Most of the studies (96 %) used multiple training methods with education and SBT most frequently used. Thirteen studies reported outcomes in clinical settings, including seven that demonstrated changes in technical skills following education and SBT. Two studies that assessed transfer of skills failed to show successful transfer from simulation to a clinical setting. Two articles reported the transfer of skills between direct and video laryngoscope devices. Only one study evaluated skill retention (at 6–9 months) but did not demonstrate proficiency after initial training or at follow up. No studies described the effects of training on non-technical skills.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>No included studies or combination of studies seems likely to provide a high-certainty evidence-basis for optimal training methodology. Results suggested using a training bundle including education, SBT and supervision. Knowledge gaps remain, including the most effective methodology for non-technical skill training. In addition, the evidence of technical skill retention beyond the immediate training episode, and transfer to a variety of clinical environments is very limited. Given the importance of successful neonatal intubation, more research in these areas is justified.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":94192,"journal":{"name":"Resuscitation plus","volume":"20 ","pages":"Article 100776"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666520424002273/pdfft?md5=f9f80f03f914837517c08679e8fdc331&pid=1-s2.0-S2666520424002273-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Approaches to neonatal intubation training: A scoping review\",\"authors\":\"Jasmine Antoine ,&nbsp;Brian Dunn ,&nbsp;Mia McLanders ,&nbsp;Luke Jardine ,&nbsp;Helen Liley\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.resplu.2024.100776\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Neonatal intubation is a lifesaving skill that a variety of clinicians need to establish as it can be required anywhere babies are born or hospitalised and cannot depend on the immediate availability of an experienced senior clinician. However, neonatal intubation is complex and risky, requiring technical and non-technical skill competence. Studies report that rates of successful neonatal intubation by junior clinicians are low, providing a mandate to examine the best methods to improve skill acquisition, retention, and transfer.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>We utilised PRISMA-ScR methodology to capture the range of training approaches in the simulation and clinical settings, and to assess the range of technical and non-technical skill outcome measures that were used in the included studies. Databases were searched from inception to August 2024 to identify studies reporting outcomes for medical practitioners-in-training, nurses, and nurse practitioners. Identified studies meeting inclusion criteria underwent data charting with study characteristics tabulated.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Twenty-six studies (involving 1449 participants) were included. Training methodology was diverse and included self-directed learning, didactic education, demonstration, simulation-based training (SBT), instructor feedback, debriefing and supervised clinical practice. Most of the studies (96 %) used multiple training methods with education and SBT most frequently used. Thirteen studies reported outcomes in clinical settings, including seven that demonstrated changes in technical skills following education and SBT. Two studies that assessed transfer of skills failed to show successful transfer from simulation to a clinical setting. Two articles reported the transfer of skills between direct and video laryngoscope devices. Only one study evaluated skill retention (at 6–9 months) but did not demonstrate proficiency after initial training or at follow up. No studies described the effects of training on non-technical skills.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>No included studies or combination of studies seems likely to provide a high-certainty evidence-basis for optimal training methodology. Results suggested using a training bundle including education, SBT and supervision. Knowledge gaps remain, including the most effective methodology for non-technical skill training. In addition, the evidence of technical skill retention beyond the immediate training episode, and transfer to a variety of clinical environments is very limited. Given the importance of successful neonatal intubation, more research in these areas is justified.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94192,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Resuscitation plus\",\"volume\":\"20 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100776\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666520424002273/pdfft?md5=f9f80f03f914837517c08679e8fdc331&pid=1-s2.0-S2666520424002273-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Resuscitation plus\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666520424002273\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Resuscitation plus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666520424002273","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:新生儿插管是一项拯救生命的技能,各种临床医生都需要掌握,因为在婴儿出生或住院的任何地方都可能需要插管,而且不能依赖经验丰富的资深临床医生立即进行插管。然而,新生儿插管既复杂又有风险,需要具备技术和非技术技能。研究报告显示,初级临床医生的新生儿插管成功率很低,因此有必要研究提高技能掌握、保持和转移的最佳方法。方法我们利用 PRISMA-ScR 方法来了解模拟和临床环境中的各种培训方法,并评估纳入研究中使用的各种技术和非技术技能结果测量方法。我们检索了从开始到 2024 年 8 月的数据库,以确定报告培训医师、护士和执业护士结果的研究。对符合纳入标准的研究进行了数据制表,并将研究特征制成表格。结果共纳入 26 项研究(涉及 1449 名参与者)。培训方法多种多样,包括自主学习、说教式教育、演示、模拟培训(SBT)、教师反馈、汇报和指导临床实践。大多数研究(96%)使用了多种培训方法,其中教育和模拟培训使用得最多。有 13 项研究报告了在临床环境中取得的成果,其中有 7 项证明了教育和 SBT 后技术技能的变化。两项对技能转移进行评估的研究未能表明模拟训练成功转移到临床环境中。两篇文章报告了直接喉镜和视频喉镜设备之间的技能转移。只有一项研究评估了技能的保持情况(6-9 个月),但并未显示初次培训后或随访时的熟练程度。没有研究描述了培训对非技术性技能的影响。结论所纳入的研究或研究组合似乎都无法为最佳培训方法提供高确定性的证据基础。研究结果建议使用包括教育、SBT 和监督在内的捆绑式培训。知识差距依然存在,包括非技术技能培训的最有效方法。此外,关于技术技能在培训结束后的保留以及在各种临床环境中的转移的证据也非常有限。鉴于新生儿成功插管的重要性,有必要在这些领域开展更多研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Approaches to neonatal intubation training: A scoping review

Introduction

Neonatal intubation is a lifesaving skill that a variety of clinicians need to establish as it can be required anywhere babies are born or hospitalised and cannot depend on the immediate availability of an experienced senior clinician. However, neonatal intubation is complex and risky, requiring technical and non-technical skill competence. Studies report that rates of successful neonatal intubation by junior clinicians are low, providing a mandate to examine the best methods to improve skill acquisition, retention, and transfer.

Method

We utilised PRISMA-ScR methodology to capture the range of training approaches in the simulation and clinical settings, and to assess the range of technical and non-technical skill outcome measures that were used in the included studies. Databases were searched from inception to August 2024 to identify studies reporting outcomes for medical practitioners-in-training, nurses, and nurse practitioners. Identified studies meeting inclusion criteria underwent data charting with study characteristics tabulated.

Results

Twenty-six studies (involving 1449 participants) were included. Training methodology was diverse and included self-directed learning, didactic education, demonstration, simulation-based training (SBT), instructor feedback, debriefing and supervised clinical practice. Most of the studies (96 %) used multiple training methods with education and SBT most frequently used. Thirteen studies reported outcomes in clinical settings, including seven that demonstrated changes in technical skills following education and SBT. Two studies that assessed transfer of skills failed to show successful transfer from simulation to a clinical setting. Two articles reported the transfer of skills between direct and video laryngoscope devices. Only one study evaluated skill retention (at 6–9 months) but did not demonstrate proficiency after initial training or at follow up. No studies described the effects of training on non-technical skills.

Conclusion

No included studies or combination of studies seems likely to provide a high-certainty evidence-basis for optimal training methodology. Results suggested using a training bundle including education, SBT and supervision. Knowledge gaps remain, including the most effective methodology for non-technical skill training. In addition, the evidence of technical skill retention beyond the immediate training episode, and transfer to a variety of clinical environments is very limited. Given the importance of successful neonatal intubation, more research in these areas is justified.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Resuscitation plus
Resuscitation plus Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, Emergency Medicine
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
52 days
期刊最新文献
Prehospital ventilation strategies in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: A protocol for a randomized controlled trial (PIVOT trial) Effect of introduction of a rapid response system and increasing Medical Emergency Team (MET) activity on mortality over a 20-year period in a paediatric specialist hospital Cardiopulmonary resuscitation in obese patients: A scoping review Effect of chest compressions in addition to extracorporeal life support on carotid flow in an experimental model of refractory cardiac arrest in pigs Ventilation practices and preparedness of healthcare providers in term newborn resuscitation: A comprehensive survey study in Austrian hospitals
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1