Saved by the snowy owl: An intersectional analysis of indigenous rights and biodiversity in the Kvalsund wind power project in Norway

Recent literature on energy justice highlights the need for intersectional considerations in energy decisions. This article addresses this research gap by presenting an intersectional analysis of a rejected wind power application in Northern Norway. By employing critical discourse analysis of the primary documents in the process, such as the wind power application, impact assessments, correspondences and the main decision letter, the paper examines the participation and influence of indigenous and biodiversity interests in the outcome of the wind power application. It presents three key findings relevant to energy justice theory. Firstly, energy regulators can make critical decisions to prioritise non-human considerations amidst competing interests of energy security, climate action and financial gains by establishing a threshold that may not be crossed regarding biodiversity conservation. Second, while indigenous participation is engraved in the Norwegian wind power licensing process, substantive contributions from institutions representing indigenous interests do not attract commensurate attention from energy regulators, highlighting the need for transformative measures to overcome structural bias. Third, the paper emphasises that energy regulators may demonstrate sensitivity to the local political context, employing strategic use of ambiguous language in their decisions. The article argues for more clarity and transparency in energy decisions regarding the intersectional consideration of indigenous rights.