{"title":"对有反食综合征风险的重症监护病房住院患者进行营养治疗:系统综述","authors":"Larissa de Oliveira Alencar B.Sc. , Jorge Ery Farias Neto B.Sc. , Eliane Albuquerque Beserra B.Sc. , Juliana Frossard Ribeiro Mendes Ph.D.","doi":"10.1016/j.nut.2024.112562","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The profiles of intensive care cnit (ICU) critically ill inpatients differ from those of other hospitalized patients, since organ dysfunction is a factor that increases the risk for Refeeding Syndrome (RS) development. It is important to understand the influence of feeding methods and caloric intake on mortality and RS incidence among critically ill adult inpatients. A systematic search, following PRISMA guidelines and protocol for systematic reviews, was conducted for interventional and experimental studies analyzing RS occurrence in adults admitted to ICUs. Pubmed, Scielo, Lilacs, Google Scholar, Scopus and Web of Science were the databases searched, and the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN) tool was used to assess methodological quality of selected articles. Out of 945 abstracts screened, 32 articles were read in full and 20 were included for data extraction. Considerable heterogeneity was found between all studies reviewed. Enteral feeding was the most used method, and, in general, progression of caloric intake did not follow the American Society of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (ASPEN) or National Institute of Health and Care (NICE) recommendations for RS. In majority, data collection period of studies was less than 7 days; RS was observed in up to 52.5% of patients, and related mortality varied between 15.6 and 83.3%. Due to weak level of evidence and high heterogeneity found within reviewed studies, it is not possible to determine a robust recommendation as to what would be the best and safest feeding method and caloric progression protocol for patients at risk for developing RS.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":19482,"journal":{"name":"Nutrition","volume":"128 ","pages":"Article 112562"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Nutritional therapy in intensive care unit inpatients at risk for refeeding syndrome: A systematic review\",\"authors\":\"Larissa de Oliveira Alencar B.Sc. , Jorge Ery Farias Neto B.Sc. , Eliane Albuquerque Beserra B.Sc. , Juliana Frossard Ribeiro Mendes Ph.D.\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.nut.2024.112562\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The profiles of intensive care cnit (ICU) critically ill inpatients differ from those of other hospitalized patients, since organ dysfunction is a factor that increases the risk for Refeeding Syndrome (RS) development. It is important to understand the influence of feeding methods and caloric intake on mortality and RS incidence among critically ill adult inpatients. A systematic search, following PRISMA guidelines and protocol for systematic reviews, was conducted for interventional and experimental studies analyzing RS occurrence in adults admitted to ICUs. Pubmed, Scielo, Lilacs, Google Scholar, Scopus and Web of Science were the databases searched, and the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN) tool was used to assess methodological quality of selected articles. Out of 945 abstracts screened, 32 articles were read in full and 20 were included for data extraction. Considerable heterogeneity was found between all studies reviewed. Enteral feeding was the most used method, and, in general, progression of caloric intake did not follow the American Society of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (ASPEN) or National Institute of Health and Care (NICE) recommendations for RS. In majority, data collection period of studies was less than 7 days; RS was observed in up to 52.5% of patients, and related mortality varied between 15.6 and 83.3%. Due to weak level of evidence and high heterogeneity found within reviewed studies, it is not possible to determine a robust recommendation as to what would be the best and safest feeding method and caloric progression protocol for patients at risk for developing RS.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19482,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nutrition\",\"volume\":\"128 \",\"pages\":\"Article 112562\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nutrition\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0899900724002119\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NUTRITION & DIETETICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0899900724002119","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Nutritional therapy in intensive care unit inpatients at risk for refeeding syndrome: A systematic review
The profiles of intensive care cnit (ICU) critically ill inpatients differ from those of other hospitalized patients, since organ dysfunction is a factor that increases the risk for Refeeding Syndrome (RS) development. It is important to understand the influence of feeding methods and caloric intake on mortality and RS incidence among critically ill adult inpatients. A systematic search, following PRISMA guidelines and protocol for systematic reviews, was conducted for interventional and experimental studies analyzing RS occurrence in adults admitted to ICUs. Pubmed, Scielo, Lilacs, Google Scholar, Scopus and Web of Science were the databases searched, and the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN) tool was used to assess methodological quality of selected articles. Out of 945 abstracts screened, 32 articles were read in full and 20 were included for data extraction. Considerable heterogeneity was found between all studies reviewed. Enteral feeding was the most used method, and, in general, progression of caloric intake did not follow the American Society of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (ASPEN) or National Institute of Health and Care (NICE) recommendations for RS. In majority, data collection period of studies was less than 7 days; RS was observed in up to 52.5% of patients, and related mortality varied between 15.6 and 83.3%. Due to weak level of evidence and high heterogeneity found within reviewed studies, it is not possible to determine a robust recommendation as to what would be the best and safest feeding method and caloric progression protocol for patients at risk for developing RS.
期刊介绍:
Nutrition has an open access mirror journal Nutrition: X, sharing the same aims and scope, editorial team, submission system and rigorous peer review.
Founded by Michael M. Meguid in the early 1980''s, Nutrition presents advances in nutrition research and science, informs its readers on new and advancing technologies and data in clinical nutrition practice, encourages the application of outcomes research and meta-analyses to problems in patient-related nutrition; and seeks to help clarify and set the research, policy and practice agenda for nutrition science to enhance human well-being in the years ahead.