为危机中的世界设计变革性干预措施:"世界观之旅 "如何促进个人、文化和系统的变革

IF 4.9 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Environmental Science & Policy Pub Date : 2024-09-21 DOI:10.1016/j.envsci.2024.103896
Annick De Witt , Margien Bootsma , Brian J. Dermody , Karin Rebel
{"title":"为危机中的世界设计变革性干预措施:\"世界观之旅 \"如何促进个人、文化和系统的变革","authors":"Annick De Witt ,&nbsp;Margien Bootsma ,&nbsp;Brian J. Dermody ,&nbsp;Karin Rebel","doi":"10.1016/j.envsci.2024.103896","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Our world is arguably in <em>existential crisi</em>s<em>,</em> with crises manifesting in nearly every facet of our existence, from education, mental health, and culture, to democracy, environment, and institutions. As our worldviews are often considered a <em>root cause</em> of this crisis, numerous voices emphasize the need for more <em>transformative</em> approaches that actively engage these <em>deep leverage points</em> (i.e., the places in complex systems where intervening may enable transformative, systemic change). To explore these ideas, we developed a new approach in the context of our sustainability education at Utrecht University, which we refer to as the <em>Worldview Journey</em>. In this article we use <em>educational design research</em> to present the first two phases of our intervention-design: 1) our needs analysis and problem identification, and 2) our design development and implementation, consisting of multiple iterations of conceptualizing and prototyping, while using student evaluations (n=360). Though the third phase of formal evaluation is still to be conducted, our results underscore that our intervention responds to a critical gap in current sustainability curricula (and arguably beyond) of learning to reflectively engage with diverse perspectives and worldviews, while offering an exemplary approach to address this gap. Simultaneously, our results offer a <em>qualitative impression</em> of students’ reception of this approach, demonstrating that 1) examining worldviews in a personal, transformative manner was greatly appreciated; 2) as was the usage of transformative learning methods; 3) with students frequently reporting small but meaningful perspective-shifts as outcome of the intervention; 4) which may thereby contribute to the development of important human, democratic capabilities. As the latter may be crucial in addressing the multiplicity of crises humanity is facing, our study arguably forges a new pathway for designing interventions that concurrently invite for personal, cultural, and systems transformation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":313,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Science & Policy","volume":"162 ","pages":"Article 103896"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1462901124002302/pdfft?md5=92d4255242f9bcb752421114263c3b06&pid=1-s2.0-S1462901124002302-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Designing transformative interventions for a world in crisis: How the ‘Worldview Journey’ invites for personal, cultural, and systems transformation\",\"authors\":\"Annick De Witt ,&nbsp;Margien Bootsma ,&nbsp;Brian J. Dermody ,&nbsp;Karin Rebel\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.envsci.2024.103896\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Our world is arguably in <em>existential crisi</em>s<em>,</em> with crises manifesting in nearly every facet of our existence, from education, mental health, and culture, to democracy, environment, and institutions. As our worldviews are often considered a <em>root cause</em> of this crisis, numerous voices emphasize the need for more <em>transformative</em> approaches that actively engage these <em>deep leverage points</em> (i.e., the places in complex systems where intervening may enable transformative, systemic change). To explore these ideas, we developed a new approach in the context of our sustainability education at Utrecht University, which we refer to as the <em>Worldview Journey</em>. In this article we use <em>educational design research</em> to present the first two phases of our intervention-design: 1) our needs analysis and problem identification, and 2) our design development and implementation, consisting of multiple iterations of conceptualizing and prototyping, while using student evaluations (n=360). Though the third phase of formal evaluation is still to be conducted, our results underscore that our intervention responds to a critical gap in current sustainability curricula (and arguably beyond) of learning to reflectively engage with diverse perspectives and worldviews, while offering an exemplary approach to address this gap. Simultaneously, our results offer a <em>qualitative impression</em> of students’ reception of this approach, demonstrating that 1) examining worldviews in a personal, transformative manner was greatly appreciated; 2) as was the usage of transformative learning methods; 3) with students frequently reporting small but meaningful perspective-shifts as outcome of the intervention; 4) which may thereby contribute to the development of important human, democratic capabilities. As the latter may be crucial in addressing the multiplicity of crises humanity is facing, our study arguably forges a new pathway for designing interventions that concurrently invite for personal, cultural, and systems transformation.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":313,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental Science & Policy\",\"volume\":\"162 \",\"pages\":\"Article 103896\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1462901124002302/pdfft?md5=92d4255242f9bcb752421114263c3b06&pid=1-s2.0-S1462901124002302-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental Science & Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1462901124002302\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Science & Policy","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1462901124002302","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

可以说,我们的世界正处于生存危机之中,从教育、心理健康、文化到民主、环境和制度,危机几乎体现在我们生存的方方面面。由于我们的世界观往往被认为是这场危机的根源,因此许多人都强调,需要采取更具变革性的方法,积极介入这些深层杠杆点(即复杂系统中的某些地方,在这些地方进行干预可能会带来变革性的系统性变化)。为了探索这些想法,我们在乌得勒支大学的可持续发展教育中开发了一种新方法,我们称之为 "世界观之旅"。在本文中,我们利用教育设计研究来介绍我们干预设计的前两个阶段:1)我们的需求分析和问题识别;2)我们的设计开发和实施,包括概念化和原型设计的多次迭代,同时使用学生评价(n=360)。虽然第三阶段的正式评估仍有待进行,但我们的结果强调,我们的干预措施回应了当前可持续发展课程(也可以说超越了可持续发展课程)中的一个关键缺口,即学习反思性地参与不同的观点和世界观,同时提供了一个解决这一缺口的典范方法。同时,我们的研究结果提供了学生对这一方法的定性印象,表明:1)以个人的、变革性的方式审视世界观受到了极大的欢迎;2)变革性学习方法的使用也受到了极大的欢迎;3)学生经常报告说,干预措施带来了微小但有意义的观点转变;4)这可能有助于发展重要的人类民主能力。由于后者对于解决人类面临的多重危机可能至关重要,我们的研究可以说为设计干预措施开辟了一条新的道路,同时促进个人、文化和系统的转变。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Designing transformative interventions for a world in crisis: How the ‘Worldview Journey’ invites for personal, cultural, and systems transformation
Our world is arguably in existential crisis, with crises manifesting in nearly every facet of our existence, from education, mental health, and culture, to democracy, environment, and institutions. As our worldviews are often considered a root cause of this crisis, numerous voices emphasize the need for more transformative approaches that actively engage these deep leverage points (i.e., the places in complex systems where intervening may enable transformative, systemic change). To explore these ideas, we developed a new approach in the context of our sustainability education at Utrecht University, which we refer to as the Worldview Journey. In this article we use educational design research to present the first two phases of our intervention-design: 1) our needs analysis and problem identification, and 2) our design development and implementation, consisting of multiple iterations of conceptualizing and prototyping, while using student evaluations (n=360). Though the third phase of formal evaluation is still to be conducted, our results underscore that our intervention responds to a critical gap in current sustainability curricula (and arguably beyond) of learning to reflectively engage with diverse perspectives and worldviews, while offering an exemplary approach to address this gap. Simultaneously, our results offer a qualitative impression of students’ reception of this approach, demonstrating that 1) examining worldviews in a personal, transformative manner was greatly appreciated; 2) as was the usage of transformative learning methods; 3) with students frequently reporting small but meaningful perspective-shifts as outcome of the intervention; 4) which may thereby contribute to the development of important human, democratic capabilities. As the latter may be crucial in addressing the multiplicity of crises humanity is facing, our study arguably forges a new pathway for designing interventions that concurrently invite for personal, cultural, and systems transformation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Environmental Science & Policy
Environmental Science & Policy 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
8.30%
发文量
332
审稿时长
68 days
期刊介绍: Environmental Science & Policy promotes communication among government, business and industry, academia, and non-governmental organisations who are instrumental in the solution of environmental problems. It also seeks to advance interdisciplinary research of policy relevance on environmental issues such as climate change, biodiversity, environmental pollution and wastes, renewable and non-renewable natural resources, sustainability, and the interactions among these issues. The journal emphasises the linkages between these environmental issues and social and economic issues such as production, transport, consumption, growth, demographic changes, well-being, and health. However, the subject coverage will not be restricted to these issues and the introduction of new dimensions will be encouraged.
期刊最新文献
Ontological conflict over forests in Inari/Aanaar: Sámi’s fight for preservation and renewal Editorial Board Uncertain climate futures: Cultivating 3 A resilience in urban Ghana A conceptual framework for responding to cross-border climate change impacts What is equitable urban forest governance? A systematic literature review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1