Annick De Witt , Margien Bootsma , Brian J. Dermody , Karin Rebel
{"title":"为危机中的世界设计变革性干预措施:\"世界观之旅 \"如何促进个人、文化和系统的变革","authors":"Annick De Witt , Margien Bootsma , Brian J. Dermody , Karin Rebel","doi":"10.1016/j.envsci.2024.103896","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Our world is arguably in <em>existential crisi</em>s<em>,</em> with crises manifesting in nearly every facet of our existence, from education, mental health, and culture, to democracy, environment, and institutions. As our worldviews are often considered a <em>root cause</em> of this crisis, numerous voices emphasize the need for more <em>transformative</em> approaches that actively engage these <em>deep leverage points</em> (i.e., the places in complex systems where intervening may enable transformative, systemic change). To explore these ideas, we developed a new approach in the context of our sustainability education at Utrecht University, which we refer to as the <em>Worldview Journey</em>. In this article we use <em>educational design research</em> to present the first two phases of our intervention-design: 1) our needs analysis and problem identification, and 2) our design development and implementation, consisting of multiple iterations of conceptualizing and prototyping, while using student evaluations (n=360). Though the third phase of formal evaluation is still to be conducted, our results underscore that our intervention responds to a critical gap in current sustainability curricula (and arguably beyond) of learning to reflectively engage with diverse perspectives and worldviews, while offering an exemplary approach to address this gap. Simultaneously, our results offer a <em>qualitative impression</em> of students’ reception of this approach, demonstrating that 1) examining worldviews in a personal, transformative manner was greatly appreciated; 2) as was the usage of transformative learning methods; 3) with students frequently reporting small but meaningful perspective-shifts as outcome of the intervention; 4) which may thereby contribute to the development of important human, democratic capabilities. As the latter may be crucial in addressing the multiplicity of crises humanity is facing, our study arguably forges a new pathway for designing interventions that concurrently invite for personal, cultural, and systems transformation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":313,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Science & Policy","volume":"162 ","pages":"Article 103896"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1462901124002302/pdfft?md5=92d4255242f9bcb752421114263c3b06&pid=1-s2.0-S1462901124002302-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Designing transformative interventions for a world in crisis: How the ‘Worldview Journey’ invites for personal, cultural, and systems transformation\",\"authors\":\"Annick De Witt , Margien Bootsma , Brian J. Dermody , Karin Rebel\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.envsci.2024.103896\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Our world is arguably in <em>existential crisi</em>s<em>,</em> with crises manifesting in nearly every facet of our existence, from education, mental health, and culture, to democracy, environment, and institutions. As our worldviews are often considered a <em>root cause</em> of this crisis, numerous voices emphasize the need for more <em>transformative</em> approaches that actively engage these <em>deep leverage points</em> (i.e., the places in complex systems where intervening may enable transformative, systemic change). To explore these ideas, we developed a new approach in the context of our sustainability education at Utrecht University, which we refer to as the <em>Worldview Journey</em>. In this article we use <em>educational design research</em> to present the first two phases of our intervention-design: 1) our needs analysis and problem identification, and 2) our design development and implementation, consisting of multiple iterations of conceptualizing and prototyping, while using student evaluations (n=360). Though the third phase of formal evaluation is still to be conducted, our results underscore that our intervention responds to a critical gap in current sustainability curricula (and arguably beyond) of learning to reflectively engage with diverse perspectives and worldviews, while offering an exemplary approach to address this gap. Simultaneously, our results offer a <em>qualitative impression</em> of students’ reception of this approach, demonstrating that 1) examining worldviews in a personal, transformative manner was greatly appreciated; 2) as was the usage of transformative learning methods; 3) with students frequently reporting small but meaningful perspective-shifts as outcome of the intervention; 4) which may thereby contribute to the development of important human, democratic capabilities. As the latter may be crucial in addressing the multiplicity of crises humanity is facing, our study arguably forges a new pathway for designing interventions that concurrently invite for personal, cultural, and systems transformation.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":313,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental Science & Policy\",\"volume\":\"162 \",\"pages\":\"Article 103896\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1462901124002302/pdfft?md5=92d4255242f9bcb752421114263c3b06&pid=1-s2.0-S1462901124002302-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental Science & Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1462901124002302\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Science & Policy","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1462901124002302","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Designing transformative interventions for a world in crisis: How the ‘Worldview Journey’ invites for personal, cultural, and systems transformation
Our world is arguably in existential crisis, with crises manifesting in nearly every facet of our existence, from education, mental health, and culture, to democracy, environment, and institutions. As our worldviews are often considered a root cause of this crisis, numerous voices emphasize the need for more transformative approaches that actively engage these deep leverage points (i.e., the places in complex systems where intervening may enable transformative, systemic change). To explore these ideas, we developed a new approach in the context of our sustainability education at Utrecht University, which we refer to as the Worldview Journey. In this article we use educational design research to present the first two phases of our intervention-design: 1) our needs analysis and problem identification, and 2) our design development and implementation, consisting of multiple iterations of conceptualizing and prototyping, while using student evaluations (n=360). Though the third phase of formal evaluation is still to be conducted, our results underscore that our intervention responds to a critical gap in current sustainability curricula (and arguably beyond) of learning to reflectively engage with diverse perspectives and worldviews, while offering an exemplary approach to address this gap. Simultaneously, our results offer a qualitative impression of students’ reception of this approach, demonstrating that 1) examining worldviews in a personal, transformative manner was greatly appreciated; 2) as was the usage of transformative learning methods; 3) with students frequently reporting small but meaningful perspective-shifts as outcome of the intervention; 4) which may thereby contribute to the development of important human, democratic capabilities. As the latter may be crucial in addressing the multiplicity of crises humanity is facing, our study arguably forges a new pathway for designing interventions that concurrently invite for personal, cultural, and systems transformation.
期刊介绍:
Environmental Science & Policy promotes communication among government, business and industry, academia, and non-governmental organisations who are instrumental in the solution of environmental problems. It also seeks to advance interdisciplinary research of policy relevance on environmental issues such as climate change, biodiversity, environmental pollution and wastes, renewable and non-renewable natural resources, sustainability, and the interactions among these issues. The journal emphasises the linkages between these environmental issues and social and economic issues such as production, transport, consumption, growth, demographic changes, well-being, and health. However, the subject coverage will not be restricted to these issues and the introduction of new dimensions will be encouraged.