吻合术和造口术直肠癌幸存者肠道功能检测仪

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY Journal of Psychosomatic Research Pub Date : 2024-09-14 DOI:10.1016/j.jpsychores.2024.111931
{"title":"吻合术和造口术直肠癌幸存者肠道功能检测仪","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jpsychores.2024.111931","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Rectal cancer is often treated with surgery such as ostomy or anastomosis. The Bowel Function Instrument (BFI) is a valid and reliable 18-item measure of physical bowel symptoms. Some items on the BFI do not apply to those with ostomies. We reanalyzed data from a previous validation study to inform the best method for scoring the BFI for both people with ostomies and anastomosis.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>People (<em>n</em> = 575) with rectal cancer treated with ostomy (<em>n</em> = 181, 31 %) or anastomosis (<em>n</em> = 394, 69 %) completed the BFI and Short Form 12 (SF12) measure on a mailed survey. The full BFI has three subscales and a total score based on 14 items: soilage/urgency (4 items); frequency of bowel movements (6 items); and dietary changes (4 items). We used confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) to examine two versions (8-item, 11-item) of the BFI adapted for use with both ostomy and anastomosis. We also examined reliability and validity of the version supported by the <span>CFA</span>.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>CFA results supported the 8-item BFI that included only the soilage/urgency items and dietary changes items but not the frequency items. The 8-item BFI was reliable (Cronbach's alpha of 0.788). The 8-item BFI score significantly correlated with all SF12 subscales with Pearson correlations ranging from 0.115 (Vitality) to 0.318 (social function).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The 8-item version of the BFI was valid and reliable as a total score for people with ostomy or anastomosis. The 8-item BFI may be useful for monitoring bowel function during and after treatment for rectal cancer.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50074,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Psychosomatic Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The bowel function instrument for rectal cancer survivors with anastomosis and ostomy\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jpsychores.2024.111931\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Rectal cancer is often treated with surgery such as ostomy or anastomosis. The Bowel Function Instrument (BFI) is a valid and reliable 18-item measure of physical bowel symptoms. Some items on the BFI do not apply to those with ostomies. We reanalyzed data from a previous validation study to inform the best method for scoring the BFI for both people with ostomies and anastomosis.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>People (<em>n</em> = 575) with rectal cancer treated with ostomy (<em>n</em> = 181, 31 %) or anastomosis (<em>n</em> = 394, 69 %) completed the BFI and Short Form 12 (SF12) measure on a mailed survey. The full BFI has three subscales and a total score based on 14 items: soilage/urgency (4 items); frequency of bowel movements (6 items); and dietary changes (4 items). We used confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) to examine two versions (8-item, 11-item) of the BFI adapted for use with both ostomy and anastomosis. We also examined reliability and validity of the version supported by the <span>CFA</span>.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>CFA results supported the 8-item BFI that included only the soilage/urgency items and dietary changes items but not the frequency items. The 8-item BFI was reliable (Cronbach's alpha of 0.788). The 8-item BFI score significantly correlated with all SF12 subscales with Pearson correlations ranging from 0.115 (Vitality) to 0.318 (social function).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The 8-item version of the BFI was valid and reliable as a total score for people with ostomy or anastomosis. The 8-item BFI may be useful for monitoring bowel function during and after treatment for rectal cancer.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50074,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Psychosomatic Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Psychosomatic Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S002239992400343X\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Psychosomatic Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S002239992400343X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:直肠癌通常采用手术治疗,如造口术或吻合术。肠道功能量表(Bowel Function Instrument,BFI)是一种有效可靠的 18 项肠道症状量表。BFI 的某些项目不适用于造口患者。我们重新分析了之前一项验证研究的数据,以确定为造口术和吻合术患者进行 BFI 评分的最佳方法。方法接受造口术(181 人,31%)或吻合术(394 人,69%)治疗的直肠癌患者(575 人)通过邮寄调查完成 BFI 和简表 12 (SF12) 测量。完整的 BFI 有三个分量表和基于 14 个项目的总分:排便不畅/急迫(4 个项目);排便频率(6 个项目);饮食改变(4 个项目)。我们使用确证因子分析 (CFA) 对 BFI 的两个版本(8 个条目和 11 个条目)进行了检查,这两个版本同时适用于造口术和吻合术。我们还检查了 CFA 支持的版本的信度和效度。结果CFA 结果支持 8 个项目的 BFI,该 BFI 仅包括土壤/紧急程度项目和饮食变化项目,但不包括频率项目。8 个项目的 BFI 是可靠的(Cronbach's alpha 为 0.788)。8个项目的BFI得分与SF12的所有分量表都有明显的相关性,Pearson相关性从0.115(活力)到0.318(社会功能)不等。8 项 BFI 可能有助于在直肠癌治疗期间和治疗后监测肠道功能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The bowel function instrument for rectal cancer survivors with anastomosis and ostomy

Objective

Rectal cancer is often treated with surgery such as ostomy or anastomosis. The Bowel Function Instrument (BFI) is a valid and reliable 18-item measure of physical bowel symptoms. Some items on the BFI do not apply to those with ostomies. We reanalyzed data from a previous validation study to inform the best method for scoring the BFI for both people with ostomies and anastomosis.

Methods

People (n = 575) with rectal cancer treated with ostomy (n = 181, 31 %) or anastomosis (n = 394, 69 %) completed the BFI and Short Form 12 (SF12) measure on a mailed survey. The full BFI has three subscales and a total score based on 14 items: soilage/urgency (4 items); frequency of bowel movements (6 items); and dietary changes (4 items). We used confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) to examine two versions (8-item, 11-item) of the BFI adapted for use with both ostomy and anastomosis. We also examined reliability and validity of the version supported by the CFA.

Results

CFA results supported the 8-item BFI that included only the soilage/urgency items and dietary changes items but not the frequency items. The 8-item BFI was reliable (Cronbach's alpha of 0.788). The 8-item BFI score significantly correlated with all SF12 subscales with Pearson correlations ranging from 0.115 (Vitality) to 0.318 (social function).

Conclusions

The 8-item version of the BFI was valid and reliable as a total score for people with ostomy or anastomosis. The 8-item BFI may be useful for monitoring bowel function during and after treatment for rectal cancer.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Psychosomatic Research
Journal of Psychosomatic Research 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
6.40%
发文量
314
审稿时长
6.2 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Psychosomatic Research is a multidisciplinary research journal covering all aspects of the relationships between psychology and medicine. The scope is broad and ranges from basic human biological and psychological research to evaluations of treatment and services. Papers will normally be concerned with illness or patients rather than studies of healthy populations. Studies concerning special populations, such as the elderly and children and adolescents, are welcome. In addition to peer-reviewed original papers, the journal publishes editorials, reviews, and other papers related to the journal''s aims.
期刊最新文献
Caregiving, caring intensity, and allostatic load: A comparison of caring to others inside and outside the home Childhood maltreatment, cognitive performance, and cognitive decline in middle-aged and older adults with chronic disease: A prospective study Most people do not attribute their burnout symptoms to work Unlike other medical conditions, type 2 diabetes is a risk factor for new-onset major depression after COVID-19 The role of self-efficacy and tangible support in managing depression in fibromyalgia: Expanding social support strategies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1