水产养殖是一个功能失调的行动系统;为什么德国的养鱼业停滞不前?

IF 3.5 2区 社会学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES Marine Policy Pub Date : 2024-09-21 DOI:10.1016/j.marpol.2024.106405
{"title":"水产养殖是一个功能失调的行动系统;为什么德国的养鱼业停滞不前?","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.marpol.2024.106405","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The development of aquaculture is a story of international success, but not in the EU. The present study investigates why the development of aquaculture is stalling or sometimes even follows a downward trend in some countries, using Germany as a case study. The EU framework for aquaculture policies has established a “twin logic” as a long-term strategy: Protection of the environment and economic growth. The present sociological approach uses qualitative data from group discussions with aquaculture stakeholders from industries, politics, regulation, environmental protection agencies, and NGOs. The stakeholders indicated that a small, fragmented sector without economic and political power on the one hand, and an overregulated, complex governance on the other hand are the main barriers to economic growth. Applying Parsons’ Action Frame of Reference, the article argues that the German stakeholders are not able to adopt the EU twin logic as a clear solution for overcoming the stagnation of aquaculture in Germany in practice. For the stakeholders, the twin logic results in confusing framework conditions in terms of societal expectations, values, norms, regulations, and their national implementation. The uncertainty is rooted in diametrically societal values and leads to conflicts at the individual level of stakeholders’ decision-making for investments. In consequence, the societal environment for aquaculture investment measures is uncertain. This exploration results in an empirical-grounded hypothesis, that aquaculture is a dysfunctional system of action.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48427,"journal":{"name":"Marine Policy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308597X24004032/pdfft?md5=493762dfb0a824a39abfa73b5838c02c&pid=1-s2.0-S0308597X24004032-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Aquaculture as a dysfunctional system of action; Why does fish farming stagnate in Germany?\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.marpol.2024.106405\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The development of aquaculture is a story of international success, but not in the EU. The present study investigates why the development of aquaculture is stalling or sometimes even follows a downward trend in some countries, using Germany as a case study. The EU framework for aquaculture policies has established a “twin logic” as a long-term strategy: Protection of the environment and economic growth. The present sociological approach uses qualitative data from group discussions with aquaculture stakeholders from industries, politics, regulation, environmental protection agencies, and NGOs. The stakeholders indicated that a small, fragmented sector without economic and political power on the one hand, and an overregulated, complex governance on the other hand are the main barriers to economic growth. Applying Parsons’ Action Frame of Reference, the article argues that the German stakeholders are not able to adopt the EU twin logic as a clear solution for overcoming the stagnation of aquaculture in Germany in practice. For the stakeholders, the twin logic results in confusing framework conditions in terms of societal expectations, values, norms, regulations, and their national implementation. The uncertainty is rooted in diametrically societal values and leads to conflicts at the individual level of stakeholders’ decision-making for investments. In consequence, the societal environment for aquaculture investment measures is uncertain. This exploration results in an empirical-grounded hypothesis, that aquaculture is a dysfunctional system of action.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48427,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Marine Policy\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308597X24004032/pdfft?md5=493762dfb0a824a39abfa73b5838c02c&pid=1-s2.0-S0308597X24004032-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Marine Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308597X24004032\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Marine Policy","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308597X24004032","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

水产养殖业的发展在国际上取得了成功,但在欧盟却并非如此。本研究以德国为例,探讨了为什么一些国家的水产养殖业发展停滞不前,有时甚至呈下降趋势。欧盟水产养殖政策框架确立了 "双重逻辑 "作为长期战略:保护环境和经济增长。本社会学方法使用了与来自工业、政治、监管、环境保护机构和非政府组织的水产养殖利益相关者进行小组讨论所获得的定性数据。利益相关者指出,一方面是规模小、分散的行业没有经济和政治权力,另一方面是监管过度、治理复杂,这两者是经济增长的主要障碍。文章运用帕森斯的 "行动参照系"(Action Frame of Reference),认为德国的利益相关者无法将欧盟的孪生逻辑作为克服德国水产养殖业停滞不前的明确解决方案。对利益相关者而言,双重逻辑导致社会期望、价值观、规范、法规及其国家实施方面的框架条件混乱。这种不确定性源于截然相反的社会价值观,并导致利益相关者在投资决策中的个体冲突。因此,水产养殖投资措施的社会环境是不确定的。这一探索产生了一个以经验为基础的假设,即水产养殖是一个功能失调的行动系统。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Aquaculture as a dysfunctional system of action; Why does fish farming stagnate in Germany?
The development of aquaculture is a story of international success, but not in the EU. The present study investigates why the development of aquaculture is stalling or sometimes even follows a downward trend in some countries, using Germany as a case study. The EU framework for aquaculture policies has established a “twin logic” as a long-term strategy: Protection of the environment and economic growth. The present sociological approach uses qualitative data from group discussions with aquaculture stakeholders from industries, politics, regulation, environmental protection agencies, and NGOs. The stakeholders indicated that a small, fragmented sector without economic and political power on the one hand, and an overregulated, complex governance on the other hand are the main barriers to economic growth. Applying Parsons’ Action Frame of Reference, the article argues that the German stakeholders are not able to adopt the EU twin logic as a clear solution for overcoming the stagnation of aquaculture in Germany in practice. For the stakeholders, the twin logic results in confusing framework conditions in terms of societal expectations, values, norms, regulations, and their national implementation. The uncertainty is rooted in diametrically societal values and leads to conflicts at the individual level of stakeholders’ decision-making for investments. In consequence, the societal environment for aquaculture investment measures is uncertain. This exploration results in an empirical-grounded hypothesis, that aquaculture is a dysfunctional system of action.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Marine Policy
Marine Policy Multiple-
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
13.20%
发文量
428
期刊介绍: Marine Policy is the leading journal of ocean policy studies. It offers researchers, analysts and policy makers a unique combination of analyses in the principal social science disciplines relevant to the formulation of marine policy. Major articles are contributed by specialists in marine affairs, including marine economists and marine resource managers, political scientists, marine scientists, international lawyers, geographers and anthropologists. Drawing on their expertise and research, the journal covers: international, regional and national marine policies; institutional arrangements for the management and regulation of marine activities, including fisheries and shipping; conflict resolution; marine pollution and environment; conservation and use of marine resources. Regular features of Marine Policy include research reports, conference reports and reports on current developments to keep readers up-to-date with the latest developments and research in ocean affairs.
期刊最新文献
Local perceptions of marine conservation aquaculture for the restoration of native Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) in Downeast, Maine The protection of submarine cables in Southeast Asia: The security gap and challenges and opportunities for regional cooperation Ensuring compliance with Antarctic environmental protection through inspections: Problems and prospects Coastal communities' perceptions on coastal erosion and the protective role of seagrass meadows in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania On the provisions of the BBNJ Agreement addressing the impacts of climate change
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1