共享自动驾驶汽车的社会接受度。汉诺威(德国)从规避者到创新者

IF 4.1 2区 工程技术 Q2 BUSINESS Research in Transportation Business and Management Pub Date : 2024-09-23 DOI:10.1016/j.rtbm.2024.101195
Leen De Paepe , Frank Witlox
{"title":"共享自动驾驶汽车的社会接受度。汉诺威(德国)从规避者到创新者","authors":"Leen De Paepe ,&nbsp;Frank Witlox","doi":"10.1016/j.rtbm.2024.101195","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Shared autonomous vehicles (SAVs) can facilitate socially sustainable transport. Pilot projects with SAVs are steadily increasing, but it remains unclear which individuals accept SAVs and why. This research investigates the ‘social acceptability’ of SAVs through an online survey that accompanied an automated shuttle pilot on a university campus in Hannover, Germany (September–November 2022). A total of 140 respondents completed all the 41 social acceptability statements, which were evaluated using an exploratory factor analysis to identify five factors defining social acceptability: ‘social acceptability’, ‘effort expectancy’, ‘self-efficacy’, ‘safety expectancy’, and ‘performance expectancy’. A subsequent cluster analysis based on these factors suggests four social acceptability groups: ‘avoiders’, ‘resisters’, ‘self-doubters’, and ‘innovators’, though generally there is a high social acceptability towards SAVs. Significant differences between groups based on gender are identified, but not based on age, residential area, education, work, or income. By identifying the factors contributing to social acceptability and distinguishing how different groups might react to SAVs, a better understanding of social acceptability is obtained that will help prepare authorities and providers for the arrival and implementation of SAVs.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47453,"journal":{"name":"Research in Transportation Business and Management","volume":"57 ","pages":"Article 101195"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Social acceptability of shared autonomous vehicles. From avoiders to innovators in Hannover (Germany)\",\"authors\":\"Leen De Paepe ,&nbsp;Frank Witlox\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.rtbm.2024.101195\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Shared autonomous vehicles (SAVs) can facilitate socially sustainable transport. Pilot projects with SAVs are steadily increasing, but it remains unclear which individuals accept SAVs and why. This research investigates the ‘social acceptability’ of SAVs through an online survey that accompanied an automated shuttle pilot on a university campus in Hannover, Germany (September–November 2022). A total of 140 respondents completed all the 41 social acceptability statements, which were evaluated using an exploratory factor analysis to identify five factors defining social acceptability: ‘social acceptability’, ‘effort expectancy’, ‘self-efficacy’, ‘safety expectancy’, and ‘performance expectancy’. A subsequent cluster analysis based on these factors suggests four social acceptability groups: ‘avoiders’, ‘resisters’, ‘self-doubters’, and ‘innovators’, though generally there is a high social acceptability towards SAVs. Significant differences between groups based on gender are identified, but not based on age, residential area, education, work, or income. By identifying the factors contributing to social acceptability and distinguishing how different groups might react to SAVs, a better understanding of social acceptability is obtained that will help prepare authorities and providers for the arrival and implementation of SAVs.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47453,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Research in Transportation Business and Management\",\"volume\":\"57 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101195\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Research in Transportation Business and Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221053952400097X\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in Transportation Business and Management","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221053952400097X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

共享自动驾驶汽车(SAVs)可促进社会可持续交通。共享自动驾驶汽车的试点项目正在稳步增加,但目前仍不清楚哪些人接受共享自动驾驶汽车及其原因。本研究通过一项在线调查,对共享自动驾驶汽车的 "社会可接受性 "进行了研究,该调查与德国汉诺威一所大学校园内的自动驾驶班车试点项目(2022 年 9 月至 11 月)同时进行。共有 140 名受访者完成了全部 41 项社会接受度陈述,通过探索性因素分析对这些陈述进行了评估,确定了定义社会接受度的五个因素:"社会接受度"、"努力预期"、"自我效能"、"安全预期 "和 "性能预期"。随后根据这些因素进行的聚类分析显示出四个社会接受度群体:"回避者"、"抵制者"、"自我怀疑者 "和 "创新者",但总体而言,社会对 SAV 的接受度较高。基于性别的群体间差异显著,但基于年龄、居住地区、教育程度、工作或收入的群体间差异不显著。通过确定导致社会接受度的因素并区分不同群体可能对 SAV 做出的反应,可以更好地了解社会接受度,这将有助于当局和供应商为 SAV 的到来和实施做好准备。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Social acceptability of shared autonomous vehicles. From avoiders to innovators in Hannover (Germany)
Shared autonomous vehicles (SAVs) can facilitate socially sustainable transport. Pilot projects with SAVs are steadily increasing, but it remains unclear which individuals accept SAVs and why. This research investigates the ‘social acceptability’ of SAVs through an online survey that accompanied an automated shuttle pilot on a university campus in Hannover, Germany (September–November 2022). A total of 140 respondents completed all the 41 social acceptability statements, which were evaluated using an exploratory factor analysis to identify five factors defining social acceptability: ‘social acceptability’, ‘effort expectancy’, ‘self-efficacy’, ‘safety expectancy’, and ‘performance expectancy’. A subsequent cluster analysis based on these factors suggests four social acceptability groups: ‘avoiders’, ‘resisters’, ‘self-doubters’, and ‘innovators’, though generally there is a high social acceptability towards SAVs. Significant differences between groups based on gender are identified, but not based on age, residential area, education, work, or income. By identifying the factors contributing to social acceptability and distinguishing how different groups might react to SAVs, a better understanding of social acceptability is obtained that will help prepare authorities and providers for the arrival and implementation of SAVs.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
8.30%
发文量
175
期刊介绍: Research in Transportation Business & Management (RTBM) will publish research on international aspects of transport management such as business strategy, communication, sustainability, finance, human resource management, law, logistics, marketing, franchising, privatisation and commercialisation. Research in Transportation Business & Management welcomes proposals for themed volumes from scholars in management, in relation to all modes of transport. Issues should be cross-disciplinary for one mode or single-disciplinary for all modes. We are keen to receive proposals that combine and integrate theories and concepts that are taken from or can be traced to origins in different disciplines or lessons learned from different modes and approaches to the topic. By facilitating the development of interdisciplinary or intermodal concepts, theories and ideas, and by synthesizing these for the journal''s audience, we seek to contribute to both scholarly advancement of knowledge and the state of managerial practice. Potential volume themes include: -Sustainability and Transportation Management- Transport Management and the Reduction of Transport''s Carbon Footprint- Marketing Transport/Branding Transportation- Benchmarking, Performance Measurement and Best Practices in Transport Operations- Franchising, Concessions and Alternate Governance Mechanisms for Transport Organisations- Logistics and the Integration of Transportation into Freight Supply Chains- Risk Management (or Asset Management or Transportation Finance or ...): Lessons from Multiple Modes- Engaging the Stakeholder in Transportation Governance- Reliability in the Freight Sector
期刊最新文献
Optimized vehicle exploitation period decision in cold-chain logistics companies Who is the CPO? Exploring the role of the Charge Point Operator in electrified logistics systems Comparative study on urban freight transport sustainability initiatives: Two cases from Sweden A periodical decomposition-based two-stage NARX model for demand prediction of bike-sharing travel in hotspot areas Effects of Covid-19 pandemic restrictions on zonal transit demand: Evidence from a low-density city
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1