William F. Vásquez , Robert H. Nazarian , Jennifer M. Trudeau
{"title":"通过陈述偏好确定当地适应海平面上升的优先事项:危地马拉两个沿海城市的选择实验","authors":"William F. Vásquez , Robert H. Nazarian , Jennifer M. Trudeau","doi":"10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2024.107389","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Although an international concern and management challenge, sea level rise (SLR) has disparate secondary effects across locations due to variations in coastal topography and human modifications of natural and built environments. Therefore, a one-size-fits-all approach to SLR adaptations is not appropriate if those variations contribute to geographic heterogeneity in household preferences. Using a discrete choice experiment, we compare and contrast household preferences for adaptations to a broad list of secondary SLR effects (i.e., enhanced flooding, beach erosion, salinization of water, and loss of coastal and marine ecosystems) and program management approaches (i.e. municipal, governmental, and interinstitutional) across two SLR-susceptible municipalities, within 8 miles of each other, in southern Guatemala: Iztapa and Puerto San José. We find evidence of common preferences for investing in measures against beach erosion and changes in ecosystem; however, rankings flip across locations for flooding and salinization of water. In Iztapa, the part-worth estimates from mixed-logit models range from US$ 1.21 to US$ 2.99 per attribute per month for flood and ecosystem damage preventions, respectively, exceeding the part-worth estimates from Puerto San José of US$ 0 - US$ 2.51, for protection against salinization of well water and beach erosion. Our findings also indicate that municipal management is the least preferred in both locations. However, whereas households from Puerto San José are indifferent between the national governing body, the Ministry of Environment and Natural Resources (MARN) and interinstitutional management, households from Iztapa prefer the latter and are willing to pay twice as much, a premium of up to US$ 3.63/month, for an interinstitutional committee relative to the municipality. Based on our findings, robust SLR adaptation policies should be nuanced, reflecting location-specific preferences.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54698,"journal":{"name":"Ocean & Coastal Management","volume":"258 ","pages":"Article 107389"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Identifying local priorities for adaptation to sea level rise via stated preferences: A choice experiment from two coastal cities in Guatemala\",\"authors\":\"William F. Vásquez , Robert H. Nazarian , Jennifer M. Trudeau\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2024.107389\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Although an international concern and management challenge, sea level rise (SLR) has disparate secondary effects across locations due to variations in coastal topography and human modifications of natural and built environments. Therefore, a one-size-fits-all approach to SLR adaptations is not appropriate if those variations contribute to geographic heterogeneity in household preferences. Using a discrete choice experiment, we compare and contrast household preferences for adaptations to a broad list of secondary SLR effects (i.e., enhanced flooding, beach erosion, salinization of water, and loss of coastal and marine ecosystems) and program management approaches (i.e. municipal, governmental, and interinstitutional) across two SLR-susceptible municipalities, within 8 miles of each other, in southern Guatemala: Iztapa and Puerto San José. We find evidence of common preferences for investing in measures against beach erosion and changes in ecosystem; however, rankings flip across locations for flooding and salinization of water. In Iztapa, the part-worth estimates from mixed-logit models range from US$ 1.21 to US$ 2.99 per attribute per month for flood and ecosystem damage preventions, respectively, exceeding the part-worth estimates from Puerto San José of US$ 0 - US$ 2.51, for protection against salinization of well water and beach erosion. Our findings also indicate that municipal management is the least preferred in both locations. However, whereas households from Puerto San José are indifferent between the national governing body, the Ministry of Environment and Natural Resources (MARN) and interinstitutional management, households from Iztapa prefer the latter and are willing to pay twice as much, a premium of up to US$ 3.63/month, for an interinstitutional committee relative to the municipality. Based on our findings, robust SLR adaptation policies should be nuanced, reflecting location-specific preferences.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54698,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ocean & Coastal Management\",\"volume\":\"258 \",\"pages\":\"Article 107389\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ocean & Coastal Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0964569124003740\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OCEANOGRAPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ocean & Coastal Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0964569124003740","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OCEANOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Identifying local priorities for adaptation to sea level rise via stated preferences: A choice experiment from two coastal cities in Guatemala
Although an international concern and management challenge, sea level rise (SLR) has disparate secondary effects across locations due to variations in coastal topography and human modifications of natural and built environments. Therefore, a one-size-fits-all approach to SLR adaptations is not appropriate if those variations contribute to geographic heterogeneity in household preferences. Using a discrete choice experiment, we compare and contrast household preferences for adaptations to a broad list of secondary SLR effects (i.e., enhanced flooding, beach erosion, salinization of water, and loss of coastal and marine ecosystems) and program management approaches (i.e. municipal, governmental, and interinstitutional) across two SLR-susceptible municipalities, within 8 miles of each other, in southern Guatemala: Iztapa and Puerto San José. We find evidence of common preferences for investing in measures against beach erosion and changes in ecosystem; however, rankings flip across locations for flooding and salinization of water. In Iztapa, the part-worth estimates from mixed-logit models range from US$ 1.21 to US$ 2.99 per attribute per month for flood and ecosystem damage preventions, respectively, exceeding the part-worth estimates from Puerto San José of US$ 0 - US$ 2.51, for protection against salinization of well water and beach erosion. Our findings also indicate that municipal management is the least preferred in both locations. However, whereas households from Puerto San José are indifferent between the national governing body, the Ministry of Environment and Natural Resources (MARN) and interinstitutional management, households from Iztapa prefer the latter and are willing to pay twice as much, a premium of up to US$ 3.63/month, for an interinstitutional committee relative to the municipality. Based on our findings, robust SLR adaptation policies should be nuanced, reflecting location-specific preferences.
期刊介绍:
Ocean & Coastal Management is the leading international journal dedicated to the study of all aspects of ocean and coastal management from the global to local levels.
We publish rigorously peer-reviewed manuscripts from all disciplines, and inter-/trans-disciplinary and co-designed research, but all submissions must make clear the relevance to management and/or governance issues relevant to the sustainable development and conservation of oceans and coasts.
Comparative studies (from sub-national to trans-national cases, and other management / policy arenas) are encouraged, as are studies that critically assess current management practices and governance approaches. Submissions involving robust analysis, development of theory, and improvement of management practice are especially welcome.