限制民办学校招生是否会提高公办学校住房溢价?来自成都房地产市场的证据

IF 4.2 2区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS Economic Modelling Pub Date : 2024-09-20 DOI:10.1016/j.econmod.2024.106890
{"title":"限制民办学校招生是否会提高公办学校住房溢价?来自成都房地产市场的证据","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.econmod.2024.106890","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Despite a growing body of literature demonstrating the role of private schools in narrowing the housing premium associated with high-quality public schools, there is little evidence on how policy shocks that limit access to private schools affect this premium. Using 21,364 observations of house transaction data from 2017 to 2021, this paper examines the impact of one policy limiting private schools’ autonomy in enrolling students on the public school housing premium in Chengdu, China. My findings reveal that when private schools lose the right to select students, the housing premium associated with high-quality public schools increases significantly. The escalation in high-quality school housing premium is attributed to the growing uncertainty regarding the accessibility of private schools as alternative options. The policy effect on housing premium remains robust at school district boundaries. My conclusion implies that policy-makers should pay attention to the positive role of private schools in promoting educational equity.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48419,"journal":{"name":"Economic Modelling","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does restricting private school enrollment increase the public school housing premium? Evidence from the Chengdu real estate market\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.econmod.2024.106890\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Despite a growing body of literature demonstrating the role of private schools in narrowing the housing premium associated with high-quality public schools, there is little evidence on how policy shocks that limit access to private schools affect this premium. Using 21,364 observations of house transaction data from 2017 to 2021, this paper examines the impact of one policy limiting private schools’ autonomy in enrolling students on the public school housing premium in Chengdu, China. My findings reveal that when private schools lose the right to select students, the housing premium associated with high-quality public schools increases significantly. The escalation in high-quality school housing premium is attributed to the growing uncertainty regarding the accessibility of private schools as alternative options. The policy effect on housing premium remains robust at school district boundaries. My conclusion implies that policy-makers should pay attention to the positive role of private schools in promoting educational equity.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48419,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Economic Modelling\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Economic Modelling\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264999324002475\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economic Modelling","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264999324002475","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

尽管越来越多的文献证明了民办学校在缩小与优质公立学校相关的住房溢价方面的作用,但关于限制民办学校入学机会的政策冲击如何影响这一溢价的证据却很少。本文利用 2017 年至 2021 年的 21364 个房屋交易数据观测值,研究了一项限制民办学校招生自主权的政策对中国成都公办学校住房溢价的影响。我的研究结果表明,当民办学校失去择校生权利时,与优质公办学校相关的住房溢价就会显著上升。优质学校住房溢价的上升归因于民办学校作为替代选择的可及性越来越不确定。在学区边界上,政策对住房溢价的影响仍然很强。我的结论意味着,政策制定者应重视私立学校在促进教育公平方面的积极作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Does restricting private school enrollment increase the public school housing premium? Evidence from the Chengdu real estate market
Despite a growing body of literature demonstrating the role of private schools in narrowing the housing premium associated with high-quality public schools, there is little evidence on how policy shocks that limit access to private schools affect this premium. Using 21,364 observations of house transaction data from 2017 to 2021, this paper examines the impact of one policy limiting private schools’ autonomy in enrolling students on the public school housing premium in Chengdu, China. My findings reveal that when private schools lose the right to select students, the housing premium associated with high-quality public schools increases significantly. The escalation in high-quality school housing premium is attributed to the growing uncertainty regarding the accessibility of private schools as alternative options. The policy effect on housing premium remains robust at school district boundaries. My conclusion implies that policy-makers should pay attention to the positive role of private schools in promoting educational equity.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Economic Modelling
Economic Modelling ECONOMICS-
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
10.60%
发文量
295
期刊介绍: Economic Modelling fills a major gap in the economics literature, providing a single source of both theoretical and applied papers on economic modelling. The journal prime objective is to provide an international review of the state-of-the-art in economic modelling. Economic Modelling publishes the complete versions of many large-scale models of industrially advanced economies which have been developed for policy analysis. Examples are the Bank of England Model and the US Federal Reserve Board Model which had hitherto been unpublished. As individual models are revised and updated, the journal publishes subsequent papers dealing with these revisions, so keeping its readers as up to date as possible.
期刊最新文献
Market segments and pricing of fine wines over their lifecycle Air pollution, healthcare use, and inequality: Evidence from China Institutional investor networks and earnings management: The role of the exit threat The impact of state-owned capital on labor cost stickiness in private firms: Evidence from China Examining the behaviour of inflation to supply and demand shocks using an MS-VAR model
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1