对认识信任、防御机制、人际关系问题和症状的相互作用的调查:中介模型

IF 3.5 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL Personality and Individual Differences Pub Date : 2024-09-24 DOI:10.1016/j.paid.2024.112893
Alice Fiorini Bincoletto , Marianna Liotti , Mariagrazia Di Giuseppe , Flavia Fiorentino , Filippo Maria Nimbi , Vittorio Lingiardi , Annalisa Tanzilli
{"title":"对认识信任、防御机制、人际关系问题和症状的相互作用的调查:中介模型","authors":"Alice Fiorini Bincoletto ,&nbsp;Marianna Liotti ,&nbsp;Mariagrazia Di Giuseppe ,&nbsp;Flavia Fiorentino ,&nbsp;Filippo Maria Nimbi ,&nbsp;Vittorio Lingiardi ,&nbsp;Annalisa Tanzilli","doi":"10.1016/j.paid.2024.112893","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Epistemic trust has emerged as a promising construct in understanding psycho(patho)logical functioning. However, its interplay with other dimensions that may contribute to developing specific symptom patterns remains underexplored. This study sought to investigate how epistemic trust, mistrust, and credulity relate to relational difficulties, defense mechanisms, and psychological symptoms to enrich the comprehension of their impact on mental health. A sample of 385 Italian individuals (60 % females and 40 % males, <em>M</em><sub><em>age</em></sub> = 28.2, <em>SD</em><sub><em>age</em></sub> = 9.6, 18–65 years) completed an online survey including self-report questionnaires: <em>Epistemic Trust, Mistrust, and Credulity Questionnaire</em>, <em>Defense Mechanisms Rating Scale-Self-Report-30</em>, <em>Inventory of Interpersonal Problems-32</em>, and <em>Brief Symptom Inventory</em>. Results showed that epistemic disruptions were associated with severe interpersonal problems, more primitive defense mechanisms, and greater levels of psychopathology. Moreover, epistemic mistrust and lower defensive functioning strongly predicted higher levels of symptomatology, underscoring their detrimental effect on processes underlying mental health. These findings highlight the critical role of epistemic disruptions as risk factors for psychological distress, offering vital insights into the dynamic mechanisms underpinning mental health, as well as implications for intervention protocols and clinical practice.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48467,"journal":{"name":"Personality and Individual Differences","volume":"233 ","pages":"Article 112893"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191886924003532/pdfft?md5=5ed087a0fd5f57c25d714010cf99fcf9&pid=1-s2.0-S0191886924003532-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An investigation into the interplay of epistemic trust, defensive mechanisms, interpersonal problems, and symptomatology: A mediation model\",\"authors\":\"Alice Fiorini Bincoletto ,&nbsp;Marianna Liotti ,&nbsp;Mariagrazia Di Giuseppe ,&nbsp;Flavia Fiorentino ,&nbsp;Filippo Maria Nimbi ,&nbsp;Vittorio Lingiardi ,&nbsp;Annalisa Tanzilli\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.paid.2024.112893\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Epistemic trust has emerged as a promising construct in understanding psycho(patho)logical functioning. However, its interplay with other dimensions that may contribute to developing specific symptom patterns remains underexplored. This study sought to investigate how epistemic trust, mistrust, and credulity relate to relational difficulties, defense mechanisms, and psychological symptoms to enrich the comprehension of their impact on mental health. A sample of 385 Italian individuals (60 % females and 40 % males, <em>M</em><sub><em>age</em></sub> = 28.2, <em>SD</em><sub><em>age</em></sub> = 9.6, 18–65 years) completed an online survey including self-report questionnaires: <em>Epistemic Trust, Mistrust, and Credulity Questionnaire</em>, <em>Defense Mechanisms Rating Scale-Self-Report-30</em>, <em>Inventory of Interpersonal Problems-32</em>, and <em>Brief Symptom Inventory</em>. Results showed that epistemic disruptions were associated with severe interpersonal problems, more primitive defense mechanisms, and greater levels of psychopathology. Moreover, epistemic mistrust and lower defensive functioning strongly predicted higher levels of symptomatology, underscoring their detrimental effect on processes underlying mental health. These findings highlight the critical role of epistemic disruptions as risk factors for psychological distress, offering vital insights into the dynamic mechanisms underpinning mental health, as well as implications for intervention protocols and clinical practice.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48467,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Personality and Individual Differences\",\"volume\":\"233 \",\"pages\":\"Article 112893\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191886924003532/pdfft?md5=5ed087a0fd5f57c25d714010cf99fcf9&pid=1-s2.0-S0191886924003532-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Personality and Individual Differences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191886924003532\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Personality and Individual Differences","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191886924003532","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在理解心理(病理)逻辑功能方面,认识信任已成为一种很有前途的构建。然而,它与其他维度之间的相互作用可能会导致特定症状模式的形成,而这种相互作用仍未得到充分探索。本研究试图探讨认识信任、不信任和轻信与关系障碍、防御机制和心理症状之间的关系,以丰富对它们对心理健康影响的理解。385名意大利人(60%为女性,40%为男性,平均年龄=28.2岁,最小年龄=9.6岁,18-65岁)完成了一项在线调查,包括自我报告问卷:这些问卷包括:认识信任、不信任和可信度问卷、防御机制评定量表-自我还原-30、人际关系问题量表-32 和简明症状量表。结果显示,认识混乱与严重的人际关系问题、更原始的防御机制和更严重的精神病理学有关。此外,认识上的不信任和较低的防御功能强烈预示着较高的症状水平,突出了它们对心理健康基础过程的有害影响。这些发现凸显了认识论混乱作为心理困扰风险因素的关键作用,为心理健康的动态机制提供了重要见解,并对干预方案和临床实践产生了影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
An investigation into the interplay of epistemic trust, defensive mechanisms, interpersonal problems, and symptomatology: A mediation model
Epistemic trust has emerged as a promising construct in understanding psycho(patho)logical functioning. However, its interplay with other dimensions that may contribute to developing specific symptom patterns remains underexplored. This study sought to investigate how epistemic trust, mistrust, and credulity relate to relational difficulties, defense mechanisms, and psychological symptoms to enrich the comprehension of their impact on mental health. A sample of 385 Italian individuals (60 % females and 40 % males, Mage = 28.2, SDage = 9.6, 18–65 years) completed an online survey including self-report questionnaires: Epistemic Trust, Mistrust, and Credulity Questionnaire, Defense Mechanisms Rating Scale-Self-Report-30, Inventory of Interpersonal Problems-32, and Brief Symptom Inventory. Results showed that epistemic disruptions were associated with severe interpersonal problems, more primitive defense mechanisms, and greater levels of psychopathology. Moreover, epistemic mistrust and lower defensive functioning strongly predicted higher levels of symptomatology, underscoring their detrimental effect on processes underlying mental health. These findings highlight the critical role of epistemic disruptions as risk factors for psychological distress, offering vital insights into the dynamic mechanisms underpinning mental health, as well as implications for intervention protocols and clinical practice.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
4.70%
发文量
577
审稿时长
41 days
期刊介绍: Personality and Individual Differences is devoted to the publication of articles (experimental, theoretical, review) which aim to integrate as far as possible the major factors of personality with empirical paradigms from experimental, physiological, animal, clinical, educational, criminological or industrial psychology or to seek an explanation for the causes and major determinants of individual differences in concepts derived from these disciplines. The editors are concerned with both genetic and environmental causes, and they are particularly interested in possible interaction effects.
期刊最新文献
The Golden Mean Inventory: A new approach to studying character strengths imbalances across contexts Inside Front Cover - Ed. Board, Aims and Scope, Copyright, Publication information, Orders and Claims, Advertising information, Author inquiries, Permissions, Funding body, Permanence of paper, Impressum (German titles only) and GFA link in double column ISSID Pages The number of exceptional people: Fewer than 85 per 1 million across key traits Priming moral self-ambivalence facilitates cognitive flexibility in young adults
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1