双相情感障碍患者的面部情绪识别能力受损

IF 3.8 4区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY Asian journal of psychiatry Pub Date : 2024-09-22 DOI:10.1016/j.ajp.2024.104250
Yiyang Liu , Yuqing Song , Hui Li , Zhiwei Leng , Mengqian Li , Hongguang Chen
{"title":"双相情感障碍患者的面部情绪识别能力受损","authors":"Yiyang Liu ,&nbsp;Yuqing Song ,&nbsp;Hui Li ,&nbsp;Zhiwei Leng ,&nbsp;Mengqian Li ,&nbsp;Hongguang Chen","doi":"10.1016/j.ajp.2024.104250","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Individuals with bipolar disorder (BD) often struggle with emotional regulation and social interactions, partly due to difficulties in accurately recognizing facial emotions.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>From September 2021 to February 2023, 69 BD individuals-comprising 23 with bipolar manic/hypomanic episode (BME), 23 with bipolar depressive episode (BDE), 23 with bipolar euthymic (EUT)-and 23 healthy controls (HCs) were enrolled. Diagnosis adhered to DSM-IV criteria using M.I.N.I 5.0, alongside assessments via Hamilton Depression Scale 17 and Young Manic Rating Scale. Recognition tasks involving 84 facial expression images across six categories. The Wilcoxon rank-sum test compares two groups, while the Kruskal-Wallis test compares multiple groups with subsequent adjusted pairwise comparisons.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The overall correct recognition rate of facial expressions in the BD group (79 %) was significantly lower than that of the HC group (83 %) (<em>P</em>=0.004). Primary differences were noted in neutral (93 % vs. 100 %, <em>P</em>=0.012) and fear (79 % vs. 86 %, <em>P</em>=0.023) expressions. Within the BD group, correct recognition rates were 71 % for BME, 80 % for BDE, and 80 % for EUT, all lower than in the HC group. Significant differences in correct recognition rates of neutral, fear, and joy expressions were observed among the four groups (<em>P</em>&lt;0.05), with the BME group exhibiting the lowest rate. Misidentification of facial expressions was more frequent in the BD group compared to the HC group, particularly among negative expressions.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Patients with BD demonstrate lower correct recognition and higher misidentification rates of facial expressions, with those experiencing manic episodes showing impaired recognition of neutral, joy, and fear expressions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8543,"journal":{"name":"Asian journal of psychiatry","volume":"102 ","pages":"Article 104250"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impaired facial emotion recognition in individuals with bipolar disorder\",\"authors\":\"Yiyang Liu ,&nbsp;Yuqing Song ,&nbsp;Hui Li ,&nbsp;Zhiwei Leng ,&nbsp;Mengqian Li ,&nbsp;Hongguang Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ajp.2024.104250\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Individuals with bipolar disorder (BD) often struggle with emotional regulation and social interactions, partly due to difficulties in accurately recognizing facial emotions.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>From September 2021 to February 2023, 69 BD individuals-comprising 23 with bipolar manic/hypomanic episode (BME), 23 with bipolar depressive episode (BDE), 23 with bipolar euthymic (EUT)-and 23 healthy controls (HCs) were enrolled. Diagnosis adhered to DSM-IV criteria using M.I.N.I 5.0, alongside assessments via Hamilton Depression Scale 17 and Young Manic Rating Scale. Recognition tasks involving 84 facial expression images across six categories. The Wilcoxon rank-sum test compares two groups, while the Kruskal-Wallis test compares multiple groups with subsequent adjusted pairwise comparisons.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The overall correct recognition rate of facial expressions in the BD group (79 %) was significantly lower than that of the HC group (83 %) (<em>P</em>=0.004). Primary differences were noted in neutral (93 % vs. 100 %, <em>P</em>=0.012) and fear (79 % vs. 86 %, <em>P</em>=0.023) expressions. Within the BD group, correct recognition rates were 71 % for BME, 80 % for BDE, and 80 % for EUT, all lower than in the HC group. Significant differences in correct recognition rates of neutral, fear, and joy expressions were observed among the four groups (<em>P</em>&lt;0.05), with the BME group exhibiting the lowest rate. Misidentification of facial expressions was more frequent in the BD group compared to the HC group, particularly among negative expressions.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Patients with BD demonstrate lower correct recognition and higher misidentification rates of facial expressions, with those experiencing manic episodes showing impaired recognition of neutral, joy, and fear expressions.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8543,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asian journal of psychiatry\",\"volume\":\"102 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104250\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asian journal of psychiatry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1876201824003435\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian journal of psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1876201824003435","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

方法从 2021 年 9 月到 2023 年 2 月,研究人员招募了 69 名双相情感障碍患者,其中包括 23 名双相躁狂/躁狂发作患者(BME)、23 名双相抑郁发作患者(BDE)、23 名双相优郁患者(EUT)和 23 名健康对照组(HC)。诊断遵循 DSM-IV 标准,使用 M.I.N.I 5.0,并通过汉密尔顿抑郁量表 17 和青年躁狂评定量表进行评估。识别任务涉及六个类别的 84 张面部表情图片。Wilcoxon 秩和检验对两组进行比较,而 Kruskal-Wallis 检验则对多组进行比较,并随后进行调整后的配对比较。结果BD 组面部表情的总体正确识别率(79%)明显低于 HC 组(83%)(P=0.004)。主要差异表现在中性(93% 对 100%,P=0.012)和恐惧(79% 对 86%,P=0.023)表情上。在 BD 组中,BME、BDE 和 EUT 的正确识别率分别为 71%、80% 和 80%,均低于 HC 组。中性、恐惧和喜悦表情的正确识别率在四个组之间存在显著差异(P<0.05),其中 BME 组的识别率最低。结论BD 患者的面部表情识别正确率较低,识别错误率较高,其中躁狂发作的患者对中性、喜悦和恐惧表情的识别能力受损。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Impaired facial emotion recognition in individuals with bipolar disorder

Background

Individuals with bipolar disorder (BD) often struggle with emotional regulation and social interactions, partly due to difficulties in accurately recognizing facial emotions.

Methods

From September 2021 to February 2023, 69 BD individuals-comprising 23 with bipolar manic/hypomanic episode (BME), 23 with bipolar depressive episode (BDE), 23 with bipolar euthymic (EUT)-and 23 healthy controls (HCs) were enrolled. Diagnosis adhered to DSM-IV criteria using M.I.N.I 5.0, alongside assessments via Hamilton Depression Scale 17 and Young Manic Rating Scale. Recognition tasks involving 84 facial expression images across six categories. The Wilcoxon rank-sum test compares two groups, while the Kruskal-Wallis test compares multiple groups with subsequent adjusted pairwise comparisons.

Results

The overall correct recognition rate of facial expressions in the BD group (79 %) was significantly lower than that of the HC group (83 %) (P=0.004). Primary differences were noted in neutral (93 % vs. 100 %, P=0.012) and fear (79 % vs. 86 %, P=0.023) expressions. Within the BD group, correct recognition rates were 71 % for BME, 80 % for BDE, and 80 % for EUT, all lower than in the HC group. Significant differences in correct recognition rates of neutral, fear, and joy expressions were observed among the four groups (P<0.05), with the BME group exhibiting the lowest rate. Misidentification of facial expressions was more frequent in the BD group compared to the HC group, particularly among negative expressions.

Conclusion

Patients with BD demonstrate lower correct recognition and higher misidentification rates of facial expressions, with those experiencing manic episodes showing impaired recognition of neutral, joy, and fear expressions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Asian journal of psychiatry
Asian journal of psychiatry Medicine-Psychiatry and Mental Health
CiteScore
12.70
自引率
5.30%
发文量
297
审稿时长
35 days
期刊介绍: The Asian Journal of Psychiatry serves as a comprehensive resource for psychiatrists, mental health clinicians, neurologists, physicians, mental health students, and policymakers. Its goal is to facilitate the exchange of research findings and clinical practices between Asia and the global community. The journal focuses on psychiatric research relevant to Asia, covering preclinical, clinical, service system, and policy development topics. It also highlights the socio-cultural diversity of the region in relation to mental health.
期刊最新文献
The effectiveness of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) in patients with catatonia associated with another mental disorder: A systematic review. Enduring conflict: The effects of war trauma on the well-being of Palestinian children. Modulating neuroplasticity through synergistic ketamine and accelerated sequential theta burst stimulation (TBS) for treatment-resistant depression (TRD) – A case report Altered resting-state brain activity of the superior parietal cortex and striatum in major depressive disorder and schizophrenia Reliability and validity study of the Turkish version of the Schizophrenia Cognition Rating Scale (SCoRS-TR)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1